Has anyone got any ideas why VLR continues to fall? They are one of the few Fuel cell company to have actually successfully comercialised their product and the potential for future growth is huge.

can look at it both ways!. its gone up recently but you have to question the valuation being put on the company!. which since float has been more a less in a downtrend. products now coming on to the mkt deals with speedyhire, us military and calor gas to name a few with more products due in 06/07.

nothing in mkt cap terms compared to rivals. voller expects to be the first fuel cell to achieve profitability.

cynic- short term is anyones guess. but a long play for me.

to be honest, it is the lack of liquidity that bothers me most ...... was looking to buy 15 shares, but if NMS is only 2000 ...... you may well be right about their long-term future, but reflecting on the flotation price just means a lot of people got mugged!

agree the float was wrong. just like mrp float price and many others.

but the position they are in now would imo justify a greater mkt cap than 16m. i guess we will see.

but still no liquidity, or so it would seem ..... am i wrong?

i bought 50 shares last week to take my holding to 10k.

sorry 75 shares to exact 10k

??????????? 75 shares ????????? ....... never thought the market was so tight that that was the most on offer

75 shares at 72p? Lizard, you must be paying more in broker commission than the assets are worth!!

Lizard i think you may have made a wild calculation.

st/gdp- i had 9925 and wanted to round off to 10k- have a new broker that has offered two months no commission trading. otherwise would not have bothered.

free trading is most enjoyable you can high tick a stock without any charge.

Lizard have you seen the article on Fuel cellworks....i looked but couldn't see anything.
Thanks
Di

still awaiting it dynamite- will post!.

Thanks Lizard :-)

this is an overview of the company from fuel cellswebsite; not awaiting article.

Voller Energy; focused on the power requirements for the next generation of portable electronic devices. This includes products such as mobile generators and battery chargers, as well as integrated products that will eventually replace secondary batteries used in devices such as mobile phones, portable radios, personal digital assistants (PDA's), powertools, medical equipment, remote monitoring equipment, mobile test systems, laptops etc.

as expected Fuel Cell Today magazine article;

http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/FuelCellToday/FCTFiles/FCTArticleFiles/Article_1088_Voller%20Update%20Article%20April%202006.pdf

;

Good article on Voller, thank you lizard. Time to pile in at 68p.

seems to be one to hold imo for the med long term.

Very brief article in Shares magazine as a tip for the 'Aggressive Investor', just a brief outline of what Voller does but it should all contribute to getting Voller in the spot light over ITM and CWR.

all positive stuff gdp one for the medium long term.

got my eye on goo news expected.

VLR vs ITM

Not really the same despite the obvious attempt by VLR to allude to ITM in recent statement -- a bit of bad form

ITM key is that it will use green energy --- VLR I think distils Hydrogen from LPG

Cost for VLR will always be higher than LPG obviuosly

ITM can use "lost" energy, if it can succesfully get an electrolyser cheap enough to store it. Lost energy is nuclear and wind/solar energy which cannot be stored at the moment so is wasted during periods of low demand - night time. ITM converts water into hydrogen and therefore gets rid of need for fossil fuel, fuel dependance etc.

That's why it has a mkt cap of 300m and VLR has one of 15m Not saying VLR is not cheap or indeed ITM not expensive but just thought I point out why there is a massive difference between the companies