markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
Balerboy
- 02 Dec 2010 22:29
- 5716 of 6492
your heading for a squelch you two are, i can feel it coming on.....lol join the club
cielo
- 02 Dec 2010 22:50
- 5717 of 6492
Not much from the FT market report >>>>>>>>>>>
Desire Petroleum was up 24.8 per cent to 132p after the Falklands explorer said it had found oil in preliminary tests of its Rachel prospect.
Rockhopper Exploration, which has a 7.5 per cent stake in the Rachel well, put on 8.1 per cent to 353p.
cielo
- 02 Dec 2010 23:05
- 5718 of 6492
From the Telegraph >>>>>>
Desire Petroleum shares jump on signs of Falklands oil
Shares in Desire Petroleum rose by 24pc after the Falklands explorer said it is testing to see whether an oil discovery is commercially viable.
The price rose 25 to 131p on the news that Desire has found evidence of oil in the Rachel prospect in the North Falklands Basin.
Desire Petroleum shares jump on signs of Falklands oil
Proselenes
- 03 Dec 2010 00:14
- 5719 of 6492
greeky, however, you have to say some "sauces" are good.
It was said DES had oil - true.
It was said SQZ had multiple layers of gas (turns you oil and gas but not commercial sadly) - so true again.
The whole media/tip magazines/tip sites all generally work on "sources" and nudges and winks - if anyone believes that there is no leaks they are living in dreamland.
At the end of the day you have to watch out for the posters who never talk about possible bad news, who never accept any risk, who post things are always only ever going upwards, who avoid mentioning the possibility of bad news.
A ramper will never ever post about potential for news not to be good, or possible bad news..... that is not their game plan.
All I can say is the DES and SQZ leaks were spot on, totally correct, no claims were made apart from one having oil and the other gas in multiple zones, and that was 100% correct.
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:45
- 5720 of 6492
lol
me quids in
or sorry squids
gla
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00w10v4/BBC_Radio_1s_Essential_Mix_Roska
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:46
- 5721 of 6492
des worth a giraffe
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:47
- 5722 of 6492
sauce lol us city boys good time gl
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:52
- 5723 of 6492
= lol
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:54
- 5724 of 6492
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00w10v4/BBC_Radio_1s_Essential_Mix_Roska
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:59
- 5725 of 6492
go mate lol
huge wow
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 01:59
- 5726 of 6492
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00w10v4/BBC_Radio_1s_Essential_Mix_Roska
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 02:00
- 5727 of 6492
des oh i am sorry
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 02:00
- 5728 of 6492
little weeds
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 02:01
- 5729 of 6492
lol LOL
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 02:14
- 5730 of 6492
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=4967
gibby
- 03 Dec 2010 02:15
- 5731 of 6492
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00w10v4/BBC_Radio_1s_Essential_Mix_Roska
Haystack
- 03 Dec 2010 04:40
- 5732 of 6492
greekman
- 03 Dec 2010 06:52
- 5733 of 6492
Never Squelched someone so quick. Well done Gibby. Why anyone should post 11 times in so few minutes, with none of them worth reading I will never understand.
greekman
- 03 Dec 2010 07:07
- 5734 of 6492
Morning Proselenes,
You say, 'Greeky, however, you have to say some "sauces" are good' and 'All I can say is the DES and SQZ leaks were spot on, totally correct'.
Don't wish to expand the argument/discussion who was right/wrong, just suffice to say, there was nearly a 100% chance of oil, as long as you allow for the most minute degree. As to sauces being good (yes a very few are but we don't know which), leaks were spot on. It depends which sauces/leaks you mean.
There were so many saying it was dry with many saying it was not, so of course some were right, but they were guessing.
Many have you as a pure ramper. For myself, I feel you are more of a totally committed believer, who like many feel quite rightly they have to fight your corner. Nothing wrong with that, but you have to have balance. But to say, 'The DES and SQZ leaks were spot on, totally correct', is so unbelievably obviously wrong takes any credibility away.
Proselenes
- 03 Dec 2010 07:26
- 5735 of 6492
Greek they were spot on though, DES had oil and SQZ had gas. The sauces said nothing more, nobody claimed anything additional.
Finding hydrocarbons is 50% of the game, the other 50% is finding commercial ones. Derisking that first 50% makes a huge different to your odds of winning the game.
I have made a 6 figure pure profit this year with XEL, RKH, DES, EOG, AST and others.... I am very happy and hope others are too.
The whingers and moaners and those who take up personal arguments are generally the ones who are losing money and got all the wrong stocks and its only natural they are upset as they are losers who hate to see other people winning.
You do not see me stalking anyone ! I squelch the idiots straight off, they do not interest me at all, I am here to make money, not have pointless arguments with idiots.