Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

The situation is purely hypothetical and, if answered in a certain way, is slanted towards the creation of a precedent.

As such, it is best if it is never answered.

As and when a problem occurs, the reality of the situation can be used to determine how best to deal with things. It is highly likely in any event, that the patient would be treated compassionately. The precedent though, as referred to in my opening comment above, has not been created.

As with the air ambulance problem - compassion rules.

75% of ALL charities rely on/get funding from the government, ie the taxpayer.
2517

Is that tax relief on donations?

Is that tax relief on donations?

fred's comment actually highlights the sort of problems encountered when trying to formulate legislation

i certainly agree with the concept that to benefit from free health (or housing or unemployment or child benefits), then one has to have contributed to the system
i also concur with the concept that an immigrant would have had to contribute for a certain minimum period to qualify - to prevent short stay, milk the system and then clear out once more

with regard to health, it is perhaps not so difficult to grant exemptions in the event of "critical emergency" ..... however, it is asking for disaster if legislation is drafted intentionally with many grey areas; it's bad enough when that is not the intent at all!

"reasonableness" in legislation is also far too vague

==============

to pursue fred's question, and it can even be extracted from the emotional "worker in health care" .....

work-related injuries and the treatment for them could surely be covered by the company's insurance where there is a shortfall between the employee's entitlement and benefit claimable

outside the workplace, the "critical emergency" rule could be applied


i'm sure i have left lots of gaps, and no doubt fred or even others will quickly highlight same

Labour say they will stop nom doms. The BBC is gleefully showing an interview with Ed Balls from two months ago. He says that there is no point in stopping it as it is unlikely to raise any money and would most probably cost the UK money.

Another few questions:

Does Eire count as overseas for non-doms?

Do trusts set up in Eire benefit from ngn-dom arrangements?

Does Gideon gain from such benefits?.

but it'll sound good at the hustings for it will please joe soap greatly .... and then it can be conveniently forgotten should labour actually have to formulate a budget

trusts are trusts and the sponsor cannot interfere with their running
trusts also have to be run for the benefit of the ultimate beneficiary
but you knew all that anyway - or didn't you know you didn't know? :-)

Haze, perhaps again you are missing the principles of the tax avoidance.

Also, if living in the UK with such "arrangements" the practitioners are using the UK and facilities to enable them to do so!


-=-=-=-=-=

But like the "basic wage" and other changes and the tory claims that there would be exit of jobs and the wealthy, it didn't happen.

Fred re 420 no, that is an additional payment by the taxpayer.
2517

For Fred to play around with:

http://cameronskitchen.co.uk/

Hey Fred! Hover your mouse around this for a while.....

Enjoy.

http://cameronskitchen.co.uk/

More interesting:

But we are for Dave:

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Can somebody put on his door, ' PLEASE DON'T DISTURB'!

Anyone else on here like figs?

Did you know that every fig has a decomposed DEAD WASP stuck inside it?

Figs are technically inverted flowers that store their pollen inside the fruits. As the female wasp slides through the narrow passage in the fig, her wings are ripped off and while she is unsuccessful in laying her eggs, she successfully pollinates the female flower. The now flightless female wasp dies inside the fig, where special enzymes break down her carcass into protein.

The fig basically digests the dead insect, making it part of the resulting ripened fruit. The special relationship, which biologists call an "obligate mutualism", has taken place unchanged for the past 34 million years.

There are 900 species of fig wasps, and each is responsible for pollinating one or two species of fig plant. Although neither the fig tree nor the wasp could reproduce without this deadly cycle, knowing vegetarians and vegans still rule the fruit out of their diet. In some countries, the consumption of insects is a common practice, since they're an excellent source of affordable protein. However some people aren't quite ready to tuck into critters for their lunch.

I will now have a go at putting you off ketchup, canned mushrooms and spinach salad.....

Ketchup is required to contain ‘no more than 30 fruit flies per 100grams'.
Canned mushrooms contain maggots. They just can't keep 'em out!
There is virtually bound to be at least the odd caterpillar in your spinach salad.