Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....

the option may not be in his hands

Cameron WILL be gone if the vote is to LEAVE..

We don't need a snake oil salesman running the country, we need someone who believes in the country..

635

On PMQT dougla carsdale specifically asked the PM, that should the Referendum vote go against him and we vote to Leave, would he still stay on and implement the necessary changes.

"Yes," was the PM's one word reply.

So there you have it. He does obviously believe in the country. But as to whether his negotiative skills are up to the job.... Hmmm?

Exec,

A large amount of the Con party is in revolt at the moment.

Do you think the revolting group of "exiters" would allow Dodgy Dave to negotiate with the EU if the referendum vote is to exit?

There would probably be a challenge to his position as leader of the party and PM and probably he would lose his position.

-=====

It would be chaos.

Which group will get official backing? Will it be Leave or Out.

I think that the electoral commission has to designate one group as official tomorrow. They get £600,000 of public money, use to public meeting rooms and access to the electoral roll.

It will either be Farage's group or Boris's.

Adam Smith Institute "Britain should quit the 'Redundant' EU to be a Global citizen", adding that the global single market is overtaking the EU.

adamsmith.org/blog/new-paper-stuck-in-the-middle-with-eu

.

interesting from today's FT ......

Brexit fact check
Claim: Leaving the EU would boost British wages
The campaign to Leave argues “jobs, wages and our economy will thrive when we take back control and Vote Leave”. Economists have struggled to find any close relationship between immigration and wages. Some recent studies have found a “small” negative effect from immigration on wages in lower-paid sectors, but with no effect greater from EU migration than non-EU migration.
Read more: The FT dissects pro and anti-Brexit claims.

Both sides get 7 million pounds plus tv broadcasts, but the remains have already had the benefit of spending nearly 10 million pounds on a Pro EU leaflet.

Yes the electorial commission should announce tomorrow on who represents the two sides..There's only one on the remain side, Stronger in Europe, (not counting the Pro Labour/LibDems/Business)..

On the LEAVE side, there is several, but the two favourites are Vote Leave and GO..I believe it should be GO because they contain the most universal in those from politics, business and the general public, but its been intimated that the westminster side containing mostly tory's in the vote leave will be successful...

Hope i'm wrong!!..

3) if uk leaves eu, we ought to regain better control of who does or not come into the country ........ however, if we want meaningful trade with eu, then freedom of movement for eu citizens will be difficult to resist ..... however, uk may be able to restrict what benefits and similar can be claimed
===================

cynic i don't agree with that providing Fred's not in power ,we will have control over the amount of people who can come and live here,we will not have to take thousands of unskilled East Europeans every day .

Fred post 622
I can remember crossing borders and seeing the various police and security forces walking down train platforms with their weapons cocked.
===============

That is exactly what is needed at the moment and will be even more if we stay in the EU.

Vote Leave is considered the front-runner. It is being backed by senior ministers including Michael Gove and Chris Grayling, as well as Iain Duncan Smith who has just resigned from the Cabinet and the London Mayor, Boris Johnson.

It is being challenged by the Grassroots Out group, which stresses its popular credentials. It has the backing of Conservative and Labour MPs, as well as the Ukip leader Nigel Farage.

There are a few other groups, but it will be one of these two.

The electoral commission will base their decision on cross party support, organisational ability and funding.

Why don't they just get together just for one purpose .

There are other considerations of a political nature. Both sides want bragging rights if we leave. Farage won't be happy taking a backseat role and it will be damaging to UKIP. Boris wants to lead the official group for obvious reasons. One consideration of the electorall commission in making its decision is the ability of the groups to work with each other. They have already had meetings with the groups in the same room.

VICTIM, yes agree but the Vote Leave side had other idea's...

This is the only chance we are EVER likely to get a vote, and so there should have been total unity to achieve the desired goal...

644 - history shows that you're theory is wishful thinking ...... if you look at norway and even switzerland (i think) there is freedom of movement for all eu citizens as the trade-off for dealing with eu with no restrictive tariffs

whether or not their benefits and similar are restyricted, i don't know

Well lets get the FACTS right shall we.....

IF IT WAS'NT FOR UKIP THERE WOULD'NT BE A REFERENDUM!!!

We've had promises in the past, from ALL of the establishment parties to have a vote, but they've all gone against their words.

Rediculous to think could lose for the sake of ego's .

Breaking news
Vote leave is the official group