Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

excuse me, but you can't have your cake and eat it - see above
there are only 3 options in this vote - for or against or abstain
usa is against
uk is tending or actually for and at worst would abstain, but i think that's unlikely

The States always side with Israel when it comes to it and so do we, thats what I'm talking about. Nothing to do with cakes.

Stan,

The present government is looking more and more out of touch with the present World opinion and harken back to the days of the Empire.

------------

The UK under tory leadership has always acting on self interest, but never as blatantly as the present government, which is isolating the UK and any influences it still may have.

---------------

The economic policies, European and the Humanitarian Legal policies, the general "foreign" policies and now reform of Press regulations are out of touch.

The present cabinet is acting like 6th form old Etonians on hash.

Good government sometimes needs courageous actions, not short termed policies which are seen as politically expedient made for internal party benefits attempting to keep party funding going and the gang in power.

-----------------

stan - you're talking bollocks! .... are you trying to say that uk will therefore vote AGAINST?

If anyone's talking it's Bollocks Cynic it's you.

you don't answer the question
do i REALLY need to ask it yet again?

I've said what I've said go back and read it.

i did, which is why i wrote posts 6434 and then 6437
using your line - i shan't say logic - uk would vote against, while it is 99% certain that it won't
it follows that your line is faulty at best

The UK said today it will be abstain.

Interestingly, once the Palestinians gain full membership then they too will be held accountable within the ICC .....

Some fascinating twists to come.

Very true. The government in the West Bank does not do anything that the ICC would be interested in. That might not be true of Gaza but I doubt that Hamas would be too bothered. Only Israel has any worries about the ICC. It is Israel that will be illegally occupying another state and stealing its land. Once Israel is a state as far as the ICC and the ICOJ are concerned, Israel's actions towards the population of the West Bank are mostly illegal.

i shan't be happy that uk abstains if that is indeed the case .... would much rather have seen them support the motion, though i understand the preconditon

It looks like only 5 against of 193 now.

Israel, The United States, Canada, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands ( both governed by the US).

An embarrassing group to belong to.

Cynic? How old are you ? About 5 going by some of your posts.

H/S, So what are our Government abstaining about exactly?

Abstaining on the vote to upgrade Palestine from observer state to observer non-member state. There are a number of benefits for Palestinians.

It is because earlier this year Palestine applied for full membership and the US used its veto in the security council to stop them. This vote only needs a simple majority.

So we are where we are, would it not be helpful to the Palestinians that this Country voted for the motion then ?

The US has just said that if Palestinians go to ICC then they will cut off funding. In any other situation a court would regard that as criminal blackmail. That attitude could prove to be a costly one in world relations for the US.

Abbas just arrived at podium to thunderous applause and standing ovation from General Assembly. you can watch it live if you can see Al Jazeera TV on fieeview on channel 83.

You can also watch on your PC at

WWW.aljazeera.com

Hays,

I would agree with sentiment, but does depend of contract at time of initiating the funding.

Also, if the bases of the initial funding given was an inducements, or as coercion to toe the USA policy, or satisfy the various political lobbies, it stinks anyway.


---------------

Israel has been a spoilt child that has not heard the word 'no' for 65 years In fact exactly 65 years to the day). The US is the over indulgent parent that permits the colonial ambitions of Israel. The world is slowly waking up to the appealing behaviour of Israel. The show of unity over this motion may indicate a change of attitude. Stronger boycotts of Israeli goods could be a good start.