goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 15 Nov 2015 17:14
- 64581 of 81564
Ordinary Muslims ‘are no more to blame for Paris than you are’
A man’s open letter urging people not to blame innocent Muslims for the terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday which killed 129 people has gone viral.
In his Facebook status, shared more than 50,000 times, Leigh Matthews writes: ‘Can I just take this opportunity to remind you all that Mr Mohammed from your local shop wasn’t involved in last nights attacks on Paris.
‘Neither was Mrs Azeer from Lloyds Bank or her family. Kamal from down the road has never been to Paris, and his brother Abdul, the taxi driver, was watching the news in horror along with everyone else.
‘The people behind last night’s attacks weren’t Muslims, they were extremists using religion as vindication for their cowardice.
TANKER
- 15 Nov 2015 18:06
- 64582 of 81564
that does not answer my question , if they do not no what chance do we have
hundreds have gone to fight in Syria . so why has their family values sunk so low why do they hate their families to go . it must be the way their family have brought them up
TANKER
- 15 Nov 2015 18:07
- 64583 of 81564
these terrorists have parents they are silent .
TANKER
- 15 Nov 2015 18:08
- 64584 of 81564
isil told the world they would filter in their people via refugees we now know they are
TANKER
- 15 Nov 2015 18:10
- 64585 of 81564
will leave you all to it going back to hols in the sun tomorrow just had to come back for two days plane leaves early morning
TANKER
- 15 Nov 2015 18:14
- 64586 of 81564
paris was a racist attack on the west weather you like it or not .
and the west must reply with all its might .
cynic
- 15 Nov 2015 19:03
- 64587 of 81564
neither you nor your question deserved an answer
aldwickk
- 15 Nov 2015 19:16
- 64588 of 81564
omniscient , that's a big word for TANKER, if it is a word.
mentor
- 15 Nov 2015 21:09
- 64589 of 81564
An eye for an eye does the job, but better 2 eyes for 1 taken works much BETTER
Here's how you deal with Islamic terrorists and their bosses.
Worked in 1986 for Russians.
Similar tactics worked for IRA as well
KGB Reportedly Gave Arab Terrorists a Taste of Brutality to Free Diplomats
Fred1new
- 15 Nov 2015 21:44
- 64590 of 81564
Did it help Russia in Afghanistan?
Fred1new
- 15 Nov 2015 21:44
- 64591 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 15 Nov 2015 21:45
- 64592 of 81564
.
dreamcatcher
- 15 Nov 2015 21:57
- 64593 of 81564
dreamcatcher
- 15 Nov 2015 21:58
- 64594 of 81564
Tony Hadley - My guess as the winner this year.
mentor
- 15 Nov 2015 22:03
- 64595 of 81564
Russian TV says this clip shows IS's top "PR man" getting hit a few seconds into his sermon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1JAuNMfXw
dreamcatcher
- 15 Nov 2015 22:03
- 64596 of 81564
Lady C will be a good laugh
dreamcatcher
- 15 Nov 2015 22:11
- 64597 of 81564
Yvette Fielding - oh dear. lol She may just be voted for plenty of bush tucker trials. :-))
Chris Carson
- 15 Nov 2015 22:23
- 64598 of 81564
Jeremy Corbyn and his friends need to say whose side they're on
The lawyers and lobbyists who endlessly cluck about 'privacy' and 'human rights' seem happy to make it impossible to fight terrorism
By Norman Tebbit
4:04PM GMT 15 Nov 2015
CommentsComments
No words can adequately condemn the barbarous murder of more than 125 innocent people in Paris on Friday.
The killers must have been completing the preparations for their act of savagery even as the American and British drones were being deployed to hunt down, track and destroy the notorious psychopath "Jihadi John", or Mohammad Emwazi.
"The human right to privacy is important, but the dead have no human rights at all"
Jeremy Corbyn spoke for many of his kind, seeking the headlines for his comment that "Emwazi had been held to account for his callous and brutal crimes," but then watering it down by adding that "it would have been better for all of us if he had been held to account in a court of law."
I presume that he knows that there are no courts of law in the territories held by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, other than the tribunals which supplied victims to "Jihadi John" be beheaded for the cameras. Nor, I think, has Corbyn ever volunteered to lead a Labour delegation to Syria to bring Emwazi to an appropriate court of law. Indeed, so far as we know he has not pressed the Prime Minister or President Obama to send special forces into Syria to extract the man by force.
Yet even if, as Corbyn wanted, Emwazi had been captured, at great risk to those charged with that task, and brought to face justice in a court of law, either here or at The Hague, who would have benefited? Perhaps first of all Emwazi himself, given a platform from which to spew out his insane bile and incite his followers to even greater violence. After that, as usual, the lawyers, wallets bulging, elbows sharpened, would have been struggling to to grab the biggest share of the millions of pounds in legal costs.
Poor things, they will now have to content themselves with a lesser harvest earned in the prosecution of the Paras who were ordered to keep the fragile peace on that terrible day in Londonderry. A pity that there will be no prosecution of IRA men such as McGuiness who was also there on that day but has a guarantee of immunity from justice.
The massacre in Paris has again also sharpened the debate over the admission of hundreds of thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East. It can come as no surprise that one of the Paris killers made his way from Syria to Paris posing as a refugee, and I doubt he was alone
Here it should help the Government gain consent for its efforts to protect our cities from an outrage like that in Paris. The outrage of the NUJ at the seizure of the laptop of a BBC Newsnight reporter, Secunder Karmi, who had reported extensively on UK jihadists and which the police believed held information about a member of Isil, jars against the cries of mourning from Paris.
So members of both The Lords and Commons must now examine their consciences and ask themselves which matters most to them. Is it their right to prevent the security services from knowing with whom we all exchange emails, or the right of people not to die at the hands of terrorists?
I have said it before and no doubt will have to say it again: the human right to privacy is important, but the dead have no human rights at all.
Of course during those proceedings it would be no bad thing if Corbyn were pressed to say whether, if he had been prime minister, he would have helped our hindered our American friends kill that British
subject Jihadi John.
jimmy b
- 15 Nov 2015 22:24
- 64599 of 81564
Knob !!
dreamcatcher
- 15 Nov 2015 22:49
- 64600 of 81564
Going to be good.