Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

that does not answer my question , if they do not no what chance do we have
hundreds have gone to fight in Syria . so why has their family values sunk so low why do they hate their families to go . it must be the way their family have brought them up

these terrorists have parents they are silent .

isil told the world they would filter in their people via refugees we now know they are

will leave you all to it going back to hols in the sun tomorrow just had to come back for two days plane leaves early morning

paris was a racist attack on the west weather you like it or not .
and the west must reply with all its might .

neither you nor your question deserved an answer

omniscient , that's a big word for TANKER, if it is a word.

An eye for an eye does the job, but better 2 eyes for 1 taken works much BETTER

Here's how you deal with Islamic terrorists and their bosses.

Worked in 1986 for Russians.

Similar tactics worked for IRA as well

KGB Reportedly Gave Arab Terrorists a Taste of Brutality to Free Diplomats

Did it help Russia in Afghanistan?

.

.

Tony Hadley - My guess as the winner this year.

Russian TV says this clip shows IS's top "PR man" getting hit a few seconds into his sermon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1JAuNMfXw

Lady C will be a good laugh

Yvette Fielding - oh dear. lol She may just be voted for plenty of bush tucker trials. :-))

Jeremy Corbyn and his friends need to say whose side they're on

The lawyers and lobbyists who endlessly cluck about 'privacy' and 'human rights' seem happy to make it impossible to fight terrorism



By Norman Tebbit

4:04PM GMT 15 Nov 2015

CommentsComments





No words can adequately condemn the barbarous murder of more than 125 innocent people in Paris on Friday.


The killers must have been completing the preparations for their act of savagery even as the American and British drones were being deployed to hunt down, track and destroy the notorious psychopath "Jihadi John", or Mohammad Emwazi.








"The human right to privacy is important, but the dead have no human rights at all"










Jeremy Corbyn spoke for many of his kind, seeking the headlines for his comment that "Emwazi had been held to account for his callous and brutal crimes," but then watering it down by adding that "it would have been better for all of us if he had been held to account in a court of law."



I presume that he knows that there are no courts of law in the territories held by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, other than the tribunals which supplied victims to "Jihadi John" be beheaded for the cameras. Nor, I think, has Corbyn ever volunteered to lead a Labour delegation to Syria to bring Emwazi to an appropriate court of law. Indeed, so far as we know he has not pressed the Prime Minister or President Obama to send special forces into Syria to extract the man by force.


Yet even if, as Corbyn wanted, Emwazi had been captured, at great risk to those charged with that task, and brought to face justice in a court of law, either here or at The Hague, who would have benefited? Perhaps first of all Emwazi himself, given a platform from which to spew out his insane bile and incite his followers to even greater violence. After that, as usual, the lawyers, wallets bulging, elbows sharpened, would have been struggling to to grab the biggest share of the millions of pounds in legal costs.

Poor things, they will now have to content themselves with a lesser harvest earned in the prosecution of the Paras who were ordered to keep the fragile peace on that terrible day in Londonderry. A pity that there will be no prosecution of IRA men such as McGuiness who was also there on that day but has a guarantee of immunity from justice.

The massacre in Paris has again also sharpened the debate over the admission of hundreds of thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East. It can come as no surprise that one of the Paris killers made his way from Syria to Paris posing as a refugee, and I doubt he was alone




Here it should help the Government gain consent for its efforts to protect our cities from an outrage like that in Paris. The outrage of the NUJ at the seizure of the laptop of a BBC Newsnight reporter, Secunder Karmi, who had reported extensively on UK jihadists and which the police believed held information about a member of Isil, jars against the cries of mourning from Paris.

So members of both The Lords and Commons must now examine their consciences and ask themselves which matters most to them. Is it their right to prevent the security services from knowing with whom we all exchange emails, or the right of people not to die at the hands of terrorists?

I have said it before and no doubt will have to say it again: the human right to privacy is important, but the dead have no human rights at all.

Of course during those proceedings it would be no bad thing if Corbyn were pressed to say whether, if he had been prime minister, he would have helped our hindered our American friends kill that British
subject Jihadi John.

Knob !!

Going to be good.

fred - you asked me a question ..... i answered it (in a way) on 64575