goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 15:28
- 67935 of 81564
Joint enterprise is not about being a member of the group in a murder. That would in most cases still be murder. It is about being present and not having prior knowledge of the intentions to murder or have a reasonable expectation of murder being committed.
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 15:31
- 67936 of 81564
Bentley would not be convicted now. Firstly, he was of reduced mental capacity and had no idea that the other guy had a gun.
iturama
- 18 Feb 2016 15:44
- 67937 of 81564
Definition.
Joint enterprise is a powerful prosecuting tool applied so that more than one person - often a group - can be charged with the same crime if it can be proved that they were in some way "in it together". It applies even though the suspects may have played different parts in the alleged offence.
I don't see anything about prior knowledge etc, which is difficult to prove anyhow. The act is fact, although there may be degrees of participation in the act, as said in the definition.
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 15:49
- 67938 of 81564
That is not the legal definition.
The defense against joint enterprise is lack of prior knowledge and not having the expectation of the crime being committed.
MaxK
- 18 Feb 2016 15:57
- 67939 of 81564
Good article EL, nicked :-)
Sums it up well, but we will have to see what Dave comes back with.
If it's as outlined, the so called renegotiation will be shown for what it is.
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 15:59
- 67940 of 81564
I know of someone who gave a lift a couple of his friends to collect some money from someone. He also had another friend with him who stayed in the car. When they arrived one stayed in the car and the other three went to the house. The guy at the house would not give the money. One of the two guys who wanted the money pulled a replica gun. The guy that I know tried to stop things getting out of hand. They left and the guy in the house called the police. All four were arrested. They all spent 6 months on remand in prison. Two were charged with joint enterprise and were found innocent in court when the police offered no evidence.
Fred1new
- 18 Feb 2016 16:08
- 67941 of 81564
You seem to suffer from strange companions!
Stan
- 18 Feb 2016 16:25
- 67942 of 81564
Day by day now I do wonder if H/S is posting behind bars.
Fred1new
- 18 Feb 2016 16:35
- 67943 of 81564
He should be!
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 17:49
- 67944 of 81564
Stan
The point is that they were just average people who gave a couple of people a lift. Very easy to get involved with joint enterprise by accident and have no actual involvement. They were both at a good university and in the process of taking their final exams. Because of the stupidity of the police and CPS they have both had to repeat their final years. It could happen to anyone. That is why the Supreme Court overturned convictions of joint enterprise. It is too easily used by the police as is conspiracy.
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 19:00
- 67945 of 81564
Two polls from MORI and ICM yesterday show remain ahead
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9634
MaxK
- 18 Feb 2016 19:10
- 67946 of 81564
It wont when Dave comes back with a washout deal.
Boris is waiting.
required field
- 18 Feb 2016 19:21
- 67947 of 81564
Can't help feeling that that north Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is going to end up by being retired by his proche generals....you can't bump off all the main figure heads of a state like that without repercussions....if that happened there might be a glorious reunification of the two Koreas !...
Haystack
- 18 Feb 2016 19:22
- 67948 of 81564
I think that unfortunately the public will be too frightened to leave. The terms of the deal will be forgotten in a few days and then it will be about fear.
MaxK
- 18 Feb 2016 23:46
- 67949 of 81564
There's no deal, so far.
Maybe Dave is holding out?
Fred1new
- 19 Feb 2016 09:09
- 67950 of 81564
2517GEORGE
- 19 Feb 2016 09:18
- 67951 of 81564
Perhaps DC will grow a pair, tell the EU where to go and campaign for the LEAVE camp.
2517
MaxK
- 19 Feb 2016 10:15
- 67952 of 81564
Pigs might fly too.
It's obvious the €urobeans don't want to give even the mild reforms asked for.
The idea that you could rely on the goodwill of the the other €urovision contestants is so absurdly optimistic as to be laughable.
Why is Dave wasting his time?
Fred1new
- 19 Feb 2016 10:23
- 67953 of 81564
I would think many of the EU are fed up with the arrogance of Dave and his mates attempting to tell them what they should do.
The negotiating methods resemble the approach to the Raj.
Jumped up little englanders comes to mind!
2517GEORGE
- 19 Feb 2016 10:28
- 67954 of 81564
What about the statement from the Austrian Chancellor that ''we are a democratic country, no one can force us to do something.''
2517