Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Haystack - 18 Feb 2016 15:49 - 67938 of 81564

That is not the legal definition.

The defense against joint enterprise is lack of prior knowledge and not having the expectation of the crime being committed.

MaxK - 18 Feb 2016 15:57 - 67939 of 81564

Good article EL, nicked :-)

Sums it up well, but we will have to see what Dave comes back with.

If it's as outlined, the so called renegotiation will be shown for what it is.

Haystack - 18 Feb 2016 15:59 - 67940 of 81564

I know of someone who gave a lift a couple of his friends to collect some money from someone. He also had another friend with him who stayed in the car. When they arrived one stayed in the car and the other three went to the house. The guy at the house would not give the money. One of the two guys who wanted the money pulled a replica gun. The guy that I know tried to stop things getting out of hand. They left and the guy in the house called the police. All four were arrested. They all spent 6 months on remand in prison. Two were charged with joint enterprise and were found innocent in court when the police offered no evidence.

Fred1new - 18 Feb 2016 16:08 - 67941 of 81564

You seem to suffer from strange companions!

Stan - 18 Feb 2016 16:25 - 67942 of 81564

Day by day now I do wonder if H/S is posting behind bars.

Fred1new - 18 Feb 2016 16:35 - 67943 of 81564

He should be!

Haystack - 18 Feb 2016 17:49 - 67944 of 81564

Stan
The point is that they were just average people who gave a couple of people a lift. Very easy to get involved with joint enterprise by accident and have no actual involvement. They were both at a good university and in the process of taking their final exams. Because of the stupidity of the police and CPS they have both had to repeat their final years. It could happen to anyone. That is why the Supreme Court overturned convictions of joint enterprise. It is too easily used by the police as is conspiracy.

Haystack - 18 Feb 2016 19:00 - 67945 of 81564

Two polls from MORI and ICM yesterday show remain ahead

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9634

MaxK - 18 Feb 2016 19:10 - 67946 of 81564

It wont when Dave comes back with a washout deal.


Boris is waiting.

required field - 18 Feb 2016 19:21 - 67947 of 81564

Can't help feeling that that north Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is going to end up by being retired by his proche generals....you can't bump off all the main figure heads of a state like that without repercussions....if that happened there might be a glorious reunification of the two Koreas !...

Haystack - 18 Feb 2016 19:22 - 67948 of 81564

I think that unfortunately the public will be too frightened to leave. The terms of the deal will be forgotten in a few days and then it will be about fear.

MaxK - 18 Feb 2016 23:46 - 67949 of 81564

There's no deal, so far.

Maybe Dave is holding out?

Fred1new - 19 Feb 2016 09:09 - 67950 of 81564

2517GEORGE - 19 Feb 2016 09:18 - 67951 of 81564

Perhaps DC will grow a pair, tell the EU where to go and campaign for the LEAVE camp.
2517

MaxK - 19 Feb 2016 10:15 - 67952 of 81564

Pigs might fly too.

It's obvious the €urobeans don't want to give even the mild reforms asked for.

The idea that you could rely on the goodwill of the the other €urovision contestants is so absurdly optimistic as to be laughable.


Why is Dave wasting his time?

Fred1new - 19 Feb 2016 10:23 - 67953 of 81564

I would think many of the EU are fed up with the arrogance of Dave and his mates attempting to tell them what they should do.

The negotiating methods resemble the approach to the Raj.

Jumped up little englanders comes to mind!

2517GEORGE - 19 Feb 2016 10:28 - 67954 of 81564

What about the statement from the Austrian Chancellor that ''we are a democratic country, no one can force us to do something.''
2517

2517GEORGE - 19 Feb 2016 10:31 - 67955 of 81564

Those 'jumped up little englanders' just happen to be a major contributor to the EU.
2517

Haystack - 19 Feb 2016 10:46 - 67956 of 81564

The arguments are getting emotional already and the real campaigns haven't started. One side is saying that Cameron did not ask for enough and wasn't tough enough. The other side is saying that Cameron was unreasonable in asking for changes.

I think Cameron played it exactly right. If he had asked for much more then the EU members would not have spoken to him at all. You have to realise that there are millions of people in the UK who are quite happy with the EU and our current deal. The number of people who want to leave the EU no matter what is quite small, but they make a lot of noise disproportionate to their number.

2517GEORGE - 19 Feb 2016 11:08 - 67957 of 81564

The UK parliament tend to play by the rules, after all it's just not cricket not to. Yet time and time again we hear that various EU members ignore the rules. So if it's ok for the Austrians why not the UK or any other country. Makes a mockery of the Freedom of Movement.
We have seen how tight-knit the EU members are (not) you just have to see the individual countries securing their borders.
2517
Register now or login to post to this thread.