for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Seq - calm down, you're starting to get incoherent.

Can someone explain to me why when buys outweigh sells by three to one the sp dips?

check out the VirtX market -trades often go through there- there are 100k+showing, also look at the 100k and 250k close timed deals on LSE ,1m in all almost certainly roll overs, which sticks another 500k onto `sells`, and voila not 3:1 any more.

the aquisition of biotec was subject to shaeholder approval.i hold my seo shares in a nominee account. is that why i haven't had any further news through the post or are paper shareholders in the same position?

I am in same position as you Bos - and I have not heard anything either.
Baza

Doesn't it mean the approval of Biotec shareholders?

And if so what's taking them so long?

ta seq

Perhaps they don`t want the deal.

Perhaps due diligence holding them up - but I would be surprised!

well there goes 22p, 20p soon, and then DOWN.

Seq. loving the commentary!

you are right, meanigful has many connotations but the reason i asked was to guage how serious you were about the bear and also if you would feel it if an RNS pushed these to 30p (my target is 28 - 29 for the record).

totally relaxed at these levels but think that SETs is the best thing that has happened to SEO in a while.

prop

I`d feel it but not for long, any major change in the wind and I`ll long it- I can`t resist the blandishments of gung-ho posts on penny shares, I lead a very quiet life these days
g`luck- oh and lol!

ps don`t forget the statistic- shares take three X longer to rise than they do to fall.

i have to say that it is guys like you that make these threads. i laugh at the small holders who squirm at the mention of a bearish comment.

i am stuck in on the long side looking for a 20-30% move on news (walmart, big order, whatever). downside i see to be mid-teens. a relatively good bet in my book but the annoying thing is i usually prefer quiet out of the way names to punt in...i couldn't be further away from that with SEO!

proptrade, for a long , long time seo was a very quiet , out of the way share. (i have put bvm on my watchlist as a possible.) i am quite happy to see seq shorting seo . his record lately isn't that good!!! :-)

(then again, law of averages says he's going to get it right one day)

LOL Bosley!

yeah,its a bit addictive posting on these boards, I must make an effort and go out.
To be fair this thread had all the hallmarks of the usual ranting if one mentioned the fact that it might drop ( cries of pervert, child molestor, you don`t have any shares, and you are broke, gay , and the final insult "old"), but its good humoured now - after it DID collapse

ps bos` I have 3X more chance than you of getting it right at the moment-being short-- lies damn lies and staistics apart

lol


offski

Seq , i'd rather be called old than a pervert , child molestor or gay. knowing that we best not mention your age again...

yeah, "old" was mine!! but then again , you went on about trading in the 70's and polly peck , so i just put 2 and 2 together and got ....over 55. i still think i'm 21 so 55 is old!!!! also, the thread has always been good humoured.

Actually, i think i refered to seq as gay after a comment he made about me , called me a creep i think , he's a nutter , but a good nutter and seems to know what he's talking about so i forgive him...