Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Haystack.

You missed this one about your new love.



Theresa De Teflon:


http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07/05/prime-minister-theresa-may-insult-democracy/

Breitbart News is a far right US news service. I read it now and then to conform my suspicions of the far right press. It is a strong supporter of Trump. Its readership is akin to Tanker on here. Nothing it publishes is worth reading.

What, none of it's true?

None of it??

so fred is? :-)

Far right? Hardly. Conservative yes but what is wrong with that? Breitbart was a former editor of the Huffington Post - by your standards extreme left.
Previously left-leaning in his politics, Breitbart changed his political views after experiencing an "epiphany" while watching the late 1991 confirmation hearings for Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, who was charged with sexual harassment. Breitbart later described himself as "a Reagan conservative" with libertarian sympathies.

Huffington Post is nothing to crow about. They publish almost anything. They have an odd business model. They don't pay for any of their stories. They regard the publishing of the article as payment enough. The result is a lot of nonsense. Even the editor of the Huffington Post is a voluntary unpaid post.

"Huffington Post editor thinks journalism is only authentic when you don't pay the writer"

As you can imagine serious journalist are not impressed by that attitude and don't write for Huffington.

Anyway Haystack only read's Breitbart News 'now and then'....

Whenever it dropped through his letterbox(inbox), i should imagine..

Try reading some of their articles. They are from quite an extreme right perspective. The article about May is a distortion.

Who'se crowing? Your method is to disparage anyone or anything that doesn't fit your spiel.
Andrea is a banker - boo! Andea is not a banker - boo!
All the explorers and miners have left Toronto for London... I'm still waiting for you to give one that has delisted from the TVX and moved to London. Menwhile the gold and copper stocks I have on the TVX are roaring away while the London listings are limping along.

Ho yes i forgot...May is a middle of the road Blairite robot...

Trade deals without free movement, if it suits...



Brussels' 'hallucination' Europe REVOLT as Juncker pushes Canada deal WITHOUT consultation

REVOLTING European nations have slapped down unelected EU bureaucrats who planned to wave through a MAJOR trade deal without consultation.



By Patrick Christys

PUBLISHED: 00:10, Wed, Jul 6, 2016 | UPDATED: 13:32, Wed, Jul 6, 2016


France even went so far as to call the EU chiefs hoping to push through the massive agreement with Canada “hallucinatory”.

Bureaucrats had hoped to act as a tacit EU superstate, rubber stamping the plan on behalf of members and even nations beyond the EU borders.

But, emboldened by Britain's Brexit vote, nation states were today in revolt forcing the European Union into a dramatic re-think.

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada will now be subject to all national parliaments’ ratification after all.

The pressure came from countries across Europe but was spear headed by the French and German governments.

And the revolt is a massive slap in the face for Commission President Juncker.

Despite the Britich Brexit vote serving as a huge red flag that nation states are vehemently opposed to losing their sovereignty to an unelected Brussels bureaucracy Juncker last week said he believed there was no need to involve parliaments



more:http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/686645/EU-Brussels-Canada-trade-deal-in-doubt-individual-nations-Brexit-EU-referendum-politics

Is juncker a banker if you know what i mean .

In 2005 London had only 183 mining stocks. Now London has 362. The bigger companies are leaving Toronto and the no hopers are being left behind.

http://business.financialpost.com/investing/walking-dead-on-the-tsx-venture-exchange-how-are-zombie-companies-surviving?__lsa=4b79-f563

Juncker is technically a lawyer, but never practiced and has only been a politician without any other job.

Selective again Hays. You didn't mention the thousands that are active on the TSX compared to the few hundred in London - most being AIM companies. An estimated 55% of global mining finance was raised on the TSX in 2015.
The zombie companies article is about those inactive but still listed on the venture exchange, equivalent to AIM in London. These companies are often picked up by new ventures and refinanced.
You still haven't mentioned one that has left the TSX for London.

I think there are around 1,600 mining stocks on the Toronto exchange. I am not sure how many are active.

So Blair trying to defend himself , then Claire Short came on and said he just lied and deceived us and wanted war .Is that about it .

BLAIR AND THE KINNOCKS . ARE NOT SOCIALISTS THEY ARE SCUM

so in your eyes, apart from Trump and KKK, who are not scum etc?

you do post shit