Fred1new
- 07 Dec 2005 16:40
This board has been a little to quiet for while.
Is it time that Bush and Blair who is a close friend and confidant of Bush were tried for War Crimes?
Do you think the use by the American Administrations of renditions are War Crimes and committed with full knowledge of American and British leaders ie. Blair and Bush and they are ultimately responsible?
Also in the aftermath of the illegal invasion of Iraq are should their action seen to be as the provocation for the rising toll of British, American and Iraqi deaths.
As a result of the military intervention in Iraq do you think you are safer in Britain to-day?
Do you think one should expect government leaders and ministers who have been responsible for massive foreseeable casualties should visit the hospitals to meet the casualties they have produced directly or indirectly by their actions?
Fred1new
- 05 Sep 2006 14:33
- 723 of 1327
I believe in a democracy and the right of the minority to try to alter the course of events, especially when the leaders of the majority have usurped the leadership for their own causes or have been corrupted by power. This appears to have happened with Blair and I think Bush was corrupt and his henchmen were corrupt before the gained power.
Marc, it is a pity about my backing into your car the other causing you about 2000 of damage. But it happens and it was yesterday. You just have to get on with things. You know , no bleating!!!
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 14:40
- 724 of 1327
Fred, the minority tried and failed because the case was so compelling.
axdpc
- 05 Sep 2006 14:55
- 725 of 1327
Don't have the stats at hand but which UK government ever had more than 50% of the eligible votes?
"The servant become the master by pretending to serve."
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 15:01
- 726 of 1327
Semantics. Every party that ever promised to change the voting system lost by a landslide. nobody wants the horsetrading governments created by PR.
mitzy
- 05 Sep 2006 15:22
- 727 of 1327
Irans the next big one in about 4 months time those reactors will be bombed by the United Stats of Israel.
tweenie
- 05 Sep 2006 15:30
- 728 of 1327
USA will not invade IRAN or bomb it for fear of giving largest standing army in middle east free reign to cause chaos.
So much for a war on terror.
The leader of iran is certifiably mad , but you've got to admire his balls.
" come'an ave a go if you think your 'ard enuf "
LOL
barwoni
- 05 Sep 2006 16:56
- 729 of 1327
Last man to say that lost two sons and got a right kicking, believe Saddam was his name.......:-))
Fred1new
- 05 Sep 2006 16:59
- 730 of 1327
America, Who ?
They lost in vietnam.
They lost in Iraq.
They are lost in Afghanistan.
Who would back them?
I forgot H6 and Mitzy.
barwoni
- 05 Sep 2006 17:00
- 731 of 1327
Largest standing army in mideast lol, jeez Canada could whip those bunch of ragtags never mind the mighty USA>.......
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 17:26
- 732 of 1327
Olympic standard conclusion jumping there, fred. had you ever bothered to read my early posts on this thread, or any other thread, you would know that I blame USA - via disney & Macdonalds - for almost all the worlds ills.
No good trying to discuss with someone who reads things that are not there, and misses things that are.
However I would back any country that I thought was doing anything to rid the world of evil men like Saddam long before backing half wits who moan about things and do not have the courage to do anything about it.
Personally I would line up against Iran, Zimbabwe and Korea to name but a few, and the free world would win, if only it was not for the handwringing liberals making the suicide bombers and despots believe they were starting to get somewhere.
United we stand, divided the world is run by a bunch of mad mullahs and tribalistic idiots, with the odd dictator thrown in.
I too can jump to conclusions and your posts suggest that is what you would like. Good luck with it Fred, cos you would certainly need it.
Fred1new
- 05 Sep 2006 17:59
- 733 of 1327
H6, Would you be at the front?
Or would you be pushing from the rear in dealing with IRan and North Korea?
barwoni
- 05 Sep 2006 17:59
- 734 of 1327
September 1, 2006 No.1276
Egyptian Weekly on Hizbullah's Armed Children's Militias
In its August 18, 2006 edition, the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Yusuf featured an investigative article by Mirfat Al-Hakim titled "Hizbullah's Children's Militias." The article reveals that Hizbullah has recruited over 2,000 children aged 10-15 to serve in armed militias, and that the Hizbullah-affiliated Mahdi Scouts youth organization is training them to become martyrs. [1]
The following are excerpts from the article:
Hizbullah Recruits Children Barely 10 Years Old
According to Roz Al-Yusuf, "Hizbullah has recruited over 2,000 innocent children aged 10-15 to form armed militias. Before the recent war with Israel, these children appeared only in the annual Jerusalem Day celebrations, and were referred to as the 'December 14 Units,' but today they are called istishhadiyun ['martyrs']..."
"Hizbullah has customarily recruited youths and children and trained them to fight from a very early age. These are children barely 10 years old, who wear camouflage uniforms, cover their faces with black [camouflage] paint, swear to wage jihad, and join the Mahdi Scouts [youth organization]...
"The children are selected by Hizbullah recruitment [officers] based on one criterion only: They must be willing to become martyrs."
tweenie
- 05 Sep 2006 18:02
- 735 of 1327
"I am not going to give you a number for it because it's not my business to do intelligent work." --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, asked to estimate the number of Iraqi insurgents while testifying before Congress, Feb. 16, 2005
"I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." --Vice President Dick Cheney, on the Iraq insurgency, June 20, 2005
"F**k Saddam, we're taking him out." President Bush to three U.S. Senators in March 2002, a full year before the Iraq invasion
Still feel in safe hands?
I don't give a rats arse whether the war in iraq is justified or not, I don't care how many arabs die daily, I could'nt give a shit about afganistan.
However, I do care about the cumulative effect of a bunch of warmongering god-botherers planning their own personal armageddon/rapture..
We are truly fucked.
forgive the language.
HAPPY DAYS :-)))
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 18:23
- 736 of 1327
If I were young enough, I would be fine being at the front. We owe it to our children to ensure our world is not left in the hands of Saddam, Mugabe et al, because we were so damn busy worrying about our conscience and holding talks and more talks they just did what ever they wanted. That is the true consequence of issuing ultimatum and then not following it through when those you issued against refused to comply with the will of the rest of the world.
I'll take the consequences of a war, and the mess after it, anytime rather than wake up one day to find we are totally powerless in the face of those idiots.
axdpc
- 05 Sep 2006 18:32
- 737 of 1327
tweenie,
People can "planning their own personal armageddon/rapture" as long as they do it and keep it to themselves and leave the rest of us alone. Of course, that's wishful thinking, so most of us had to be bothered. But for those hoping to profit from Armageddon or to speed up the recovery after the inevitable, they must practice and encourage the opposite to the prayer of Saint Francis. The signs favour the Apocalypse.
axdpc
- 05 Sep 2006 18:34
- 738 of 1327
hewittalan6, "We owe it to our children to ensure our world is not left in the hands of Saddam, Mugabe et al". Quite right. But they are both puppets setup and supported to do the dirty works of ...
tweenie
- 05 Sep 2006 18:35
- 739 of 1327
?????
alan. It's the half hearted attempts that are being made that frighten me.
We invade iraq, then spend a lifetime rebuilding it. We want to sort out isreal/palestine- yet have'nt managed it.
WHY????
because it does'nt serve a purpose to.
Better to have lots of wars , make a few bucks, look good on tv etc.
If we really wanted world peace and were willing to "DO WHAT IT TAKES"
we'd have bombed the absolute shit out of IRAQ, then nuked it . then given Israel/palestine 24 hours to sort their shit out or else- they get the same.
A clear message would have been sent to the rest of the world.
COMPLY- resistance is futile........... this leadership things a doddle.
Now i'm really scared.
:-(
zscrooge
- 05 Sep 2006 19:53
- 740 of 1327
Fred, keep up the good work. I know it must be difficult dealing with such a ragbag of pompous inncacuracies 24/7. Esepcially for a half-wit such as yourself. ;))
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 20:38
- 741 of 1327
Still in a tiny minority.
axdpc
- 05 Sep 2006 23:47
- 742 of 1327
Even a novice politician can easily find a point somewhere between forging consensus and showing leadership to justify any positions, actions and inactions.