The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Dil,

LOL!

I personally don't think they will raise anything close to 6 million frorm PI's, the key here will be whether Barry can convince the creditors to participate, in which case 6 milion MAY be achievable, IMHO.

I think this is why the extention period was put in.

I think you're right Andy.

Personally I wouldn't put anything in before seeing if that initial amount can be raised. If it can't then they're basically bust, which just goes to show how precarious the whole thing is. Let the muppets do the hard work and take the biggest risk? Yep!

I also find it curious how for all the "world-beating products", they've not managed to raise anything outwith those already in far too deep. It says so much, as does the fact it has taken an eternity.


"I'm pretty confident the capital sum is pretty secure" - not sure I like the double lack of confidence here.

jeffmack- 02 Jul 2009 09:49 - 7310 of 7313
Tabby/Pilks
If they were 800k short of the 6m needed would you be confident to lend your alleged 800k to them?

Bargin Bob/Jeff >
That question could not possibly be directed at a BookmakerHow about my existing holding?how about a possible re-list at a silly SP?.How about my other holdings that are showing a healthy return.and how about maintaining a good nights sleepwith the confidence of always being covered?
No Bargin Bob/Jeff you should have directed that question at a Banker????

How about my other holdings that are showing a healthy return

Really............................. RSA and FTO

jm - we never do see a contribution on any toher thread, do we? ;-)))))

You spelt wanker wrong tabby.

.............. and Wookmaker.

ROFLMAO!

Andy
I havent read all the posts over at the zoo. Is it right that people are having to pay to take the SCLN before seeing the restated accounts. I thought it was going to be part of the application package

jeff,

Yes that's correct, quite incredible really!

Barry said they need the funds from the SCLN to pay for the accounts!

My guess is they are dire, so they want the funds in before disclosing them, but I could be wrong, the AIM market makes you very cynical after a while!

Good morning all>

Banker/Wanker same difference DilJeffI think that is a little unfairrsa is my only loser and is down a few pennies on my holdingpurchased another chunk in fto [third buy and none have shown upand 11 ml. of directors buys showing as sells on the 30/6] which would still cost me more overall in total as from this momentthis years big winner on ftse @ 3500 out.doubled oxb on a large chunknice return on bvicmks done me proud up to around 3...sold a little early but back in at 2-92 and several small punts. doing ok thank you very muchI certainly would not swap this years earner for a six month Fortis Salary

BTW>

Collaboration Agreement for Meltums Pharma Development
Posted on: Thursday, July 02, 2009


Meldex is pleased to announce that it has, today, entered into a collaboration agreement with a major UK University to develop proof of principle oral dose product samples, employing its Meltums technology. The agreement will run for twelve months. If the development is successful then it is intended that the parties will enter into agreements to scale up, manufacture, and commercially exploit the products.

During the term of the agreement the Company will receive payments to cover its materials and direct staff costs.
------------------------------------

I would say Barry/Garry are rather more than confident about the success of the lone notejust a Bookmakers hunch

Well, the above is hardly going to produce income, is it?

"the Company will receive payments to cover its materials and direct staff costs"

Bouncyits another well negotiated collaboration that gives us a twelve month punt for freebut you will find something negative.yawn.scratch headmumble!!!!

ROFLMAO!

Conteracts your rose-tinted specs. ;-)))))))))))))) And for the past few years, the negative has won the day hands down. Don't forget that, because it's why you are where you are and I am where I am. Got anything good to say about CIU yet? LOL!

BouncyI am bewildered?you live in a little World of your own.hope and glory.jackanoryfairy storyif you write like a cnutact like a cnut.odds on you are a Dick Van Dyke!!!

I forgot to adddefinitely no offence meant to all the lovely ladies on here

I never expect you to accept the truth, Tabatha. You've been bewildered by the piss poor performance of MDX for such a long time, but the truth was it was fecked. You, my friend, continued to throw good money after bad and probably intend doing so again.

Having (probably) established you're 180k in the hole with this lot, the only other holdings you seem to bleat about is 18k of RSA (stunning performance - not!) and FTO, plus a couple of "small punts".

I may post another lesson for you later ................ if you're lucky. ;-))

i think you two secretly fancy each other

Yawn.BTW you are 62,000 out on that stockyou just have not got a clue
Question do you hold a short position on mdx?

;-))))))

No short on MDX. Thought we'd been through that months ago. And for the record, no long either.