Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

Gausie - 13 Jul 2009 20:19 - 7369 of 8631

I don't think I ever used the phrase 'con man' to describe Barry either. But I suspect, in due course, that I probably will.

tabasco - 13 Jul 2009 22:00 - 7370 of 8631

Bouncynice edit on post 7366.I guess you realised what a prick you sounded...

Big Al - 13 Jul 2009 22:06 - 7371 of 8631

Edited nothing I'm afraid. Keep trying loser. ;-))))))))))

jkd - 13 Jul 2009 22:22 - 7372 of 8631

BA
its simply 'sidetracking' . he is master at it. after a while he hopes we will all forget the original issue under discussion, and that he kept averaging down despite all the warnings to him of the dangers of doing so. naturally everyone was wrong and the issue now turns to at what price will it be refloated at? the other stuff seems long forgotten by t and only remembered by the few who did the warning. no doubt his selective memory is at work once again, or maybe he is hoping we might all simply get sidetracked and forget our warnings. if it comes back at any price he will of course have been proven right,LoL gotta laugh.
regards
jkd

tabasco - 13 Jul 2009 22:22 - 7373 of 8631

Jeff you are by no means the only person that has changed their stance on mdxshort term probably money to be madebouncy has said similar and editedno wonder the groovy gang claim to be so cleveryou along with all other gang members claimed mdx was dead and buried it aint clever to back heads and tailseven though you have great spin!!!

tabasco - 13 Jul 2009 22:27 - 7374 of 8631

JKD.fank u werry mush..

ptholden - 13 Jul 2009 22:57 - 7375 of 8631

Heavily Discounted MDX Products

ptholden - 13 Jul 2009 22:59 - 7376 of 8631

Do people actually buy and take this stuff?

jeffmack - 14 Jul 2009 07:10 - 7377 of 8631

I still think its only 65/35 that the SCLN is successful

tabasco - 14 Jul 2009 07:36 - 7378 of 8631

Morning allI do apologise bouncyI had your post filed at 7366...when in fact it was 7363...it is correctyou did not edit
If the thing is saved and looks a winner, we'll all be in far below your incompetent price and will make an absolute shedload
Which still admits that you now think it is possible for the company to succeedand you claim you could make a shedload under the gangs doctor evil [Barry]HA HA!!!.when in fact it was only a couple of months ago you were telling all on this thread Meldex are dead and buriedmove on you wanted people to suffer..Big Al - 08 Apr 2009 16:27 - 6925 of 6945
Tabatha - I want to see some folk take the pain, you included. It should've been obvious even to a dimwit like you.

What a nice bloke you are bouncyand like I said earlier you are great on spincalling heads and tailsthen claim to be clever.while juggling pineapples working on an Oil Rigand modernising your prefab
I wish I was as astute as you.I get pissed off playing and holidaying.
Go on my Barry/Garry.make em squirm!!!!

Big Al - 14 Jul 2009 08:28 - 7379 of 8631

Morning. Apology accepted Tabatha. For the record, I may edit spelling mistakes and such like, but never edit content unless I post it as "EDIT - " or similar. I see no point.


BTW, MDX might yet be dead and buried. We will have to await the outcome of the SCLN. I am very satisfied at the fact it was suspended at 7p, a figure that was predicted as "under 10p", although it did not reach the more wishful forecast of 5p. That might come, however. ;-)))

Have a nice day.

tabasco - 14 Jul 2009 08:32 - 7380 of 8631

Jeffoffer 8/15 on scln successif there is a stampede of takers on adv.. you have priced it wrongand you will end up skintI will keep my odds to myself!stick to your day job.have you still got one?

Big Al - 14 Jul 2009 08:40 - 7381 of 8631

OH, also for the record, you'll never be as "astute" as me. You're too arrogant and if you are to succeed in the markets you will need to curtail that trait. The market will humble everyone as you have found out to your cost. Been there, done that ........ now it's all about making money. ;-)))))

tabasco - 14 Jul 2009 09:38 - 7382 of 8631

Big Al- 14 Jul 2009 08:40 - 7381 of 7381

and if you are to succeed in the markets

Fu*king twat!.no offence but my old mate has just contactedevidently he has just wet himself.please dont be a bigger twat than we have all got you for bouncy.

Big Al - 14 Jul 2009 10:12 - 7383 of 8631

On the evidence you've presented over the past year or so, you are exceedingly unsuccessful, Tabatha.

Better get your "mate" to stick his Y-fronts through the wringer. ROFLMAO! I'm also sure there's many more around here consider you a far bigger t**t than me. You keep insider your MDX bubble son. ;-)))

BTW, FDL. ;-)))))


Speaking of FDL, I did promise you another lesson, didn't I? Might get round to it later. We'll see if we can improve your "stunning" returns. LOL!

Andy - 14 Jul 2009 11:51 - 7384 of 8631

Tabasco,

I personally think it is a near certainty the SCLN will fail at the first deadline, but then Barry has to work on the creditors, and then he may make it as they have more to lose if it does not relist.

I would like to see Bridge covert some of their debt to SCLN, and if they can't make the target, you may see them reluctantly participate at a late stage, IMO.

tabasco - 14 Jul 2009 15:52 - 7385 of 8631

Andymy reply to Jeff was stating his 8/15 odds on the SCLN being successful was ridiculous oddsI dont care if there is three recounts and a bent returning officer[figure of speech before JKD says anything] it will go throughif he laid 8/15...he would soon go skinthence my commentdont give up your day jobalso Andy if you look at my posts when trig ask for odds.all the gang predicted a 1p at bestlet us see who is right yet again.

Bouncyright a 100 lines.I must keep a note of what Tabasco saysand I must try harder
There are two people on this thread that watch me like a Hawkask Jeff or JKD if I am down on the evidence I have presented before the eventand yes Jeff RSA are down a little but I have had some very large winning betsBvic has been a pretty tasty stockand the mattresses became a little firmer when the FTSE hit 3500...you try and convince all on here that you are the clever one juggling pineapples working on an Oil Rigand modernising your prefabsomehow Im not convinced!!!

Big Al - 14 Jul 2009 16:08 - 7386 of 8631

RSA has just bounced off its low (down a little bit??!!??) and BVIC might have made you 50%. Hardly barnstorming is it now? LOL!

I've given you CIU and FDL. You're not even in the same city, let alone ballpark. ;-)))))))))))))))

tabasco - 14 Jul 2009 18:53 - 7387 of 8631

Bouncywe used to think you were acting thick to wind me up.some chance!I still dont think you read my postswont lose any sleepbut I believe I used to give you too much credityou are as thick as an LBCwhatever I tell you seems to go in one ear and out the otherwithout as much as a breath of fresh air to stop itthe lights are on but no one is home. I wont be talking to you anymoreI have had enough of your insane and inane repliesgo and find Mr.Potty.that should be some conversation?..off to the west wing for tea toddle pip.

Big Al - 14 Jul 2009 19:29 - 7388 of 8631

"We"? Don't make me laugh.

Look, Tabatha, you are just about one amongst one here. You make me giggle because you are a joke character. You've really no reply to post 7386, have you?

Lest we forget:

"tabasco - 30 Apr 2008 12:22 - 200 of 6809
Can somebody tell me why mdx have dropped so dramatically on the news that Aquisitek were out of the running. Good news for the company I would have thought, and good news for me. The stock is so cheap my whole portfolio is on. I cannot believe anybody would consider a sell. Still thanks to them all. It will give me another big payday in a company that is rock solid. As an ex. Bookmaker I would lay longgggggg odds on, for a rapid 25% correction. I have been in and out of the stock since it was 27p and it has been lucky for me, but this looks like the best chance to date. The delayed prelim. results are hinted to be good. Some of you lads that are far more knowledgeable than me might have a better handle on the situation. This stock is crazy!!!"

I urge all who read your posts to really understand the above and then judge your "bookmaking skills" to the utmost. Phrases like "rock solid", "lay longgggg odds on" and even better "The delayed prelim. results are hinted to be good" - now you're into suing the guys who posted those results?!?!?!?!?! The only correct quote is this: "Some of you lads that are far more knowledgeable". Well you got that bit right, didn't you? ROFLMAO!

You are a feckin' idiot! Kiss me darling. ;-))))))))))))
Register now or login to post to this thread.