Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Is it time that Blair who is a close friend and confidant of Bush were tried for War Crimes? (WAR2)     

Fred1new - 07 Dec 2005 16:40

This board has been a little to quiet for while.

Is it time that Bush and Blair who is a close friend and confidant of Bush were tried for War Crimes?

Do you think the use by the American Administrations of renditions are War Crimes and committed with full knowledge of American and British leaders ie. Blair and Bush and they are ultimately responsible?

Also in the aftermath of the illegal invasion of Iraq are should their action seen to be as the provocation for the rising toll of British, American and Iraqi deaths.

As a result of the military intervention in Iraq do you think you are safer in Britain to-day?

Do you think one should expect government leaders and ministers who have been responsible for massive foreseeable casualties should visit the hospitals to meet the casualties they have produced directly or indirectly by their actions?

Fred1new - 06 Sep 2006 17:58 - 757 of 1327

He made false promises, operating on belief in himself, failed to take informed advice from those with more experience in their particular fields.

This led to the apathy in support services, civil service and other organisations.

He has also led to the lowering world opinion of Britain.

It is unpleasant to have as PM a person who is considered by many as a liar and are not prepared to trust what he states.

He behaved in my opinion with delusions of grandeur and yet is another failed messiah.

It is time for him to go.

tweenie - 06 Sep 2006 18:22 - 758 of 1327

He's not the messiah...........
He's a very naughty boy!
:-)

Marc3254 - 07 Sep 2006 12:06 - 759 of 1327

A very naughty boy? Sure.
Must go definately.
His biggest crime was getting caught, all politicians talk bollocks. He did it in style and was caught out. I have never been a red supporter, this whole business is a good example why, for a better example read my post a long while ago about the civil war in Zaire.
Blair hasnt made a decision that really affects us, the people, since he's been in power. He is to scared of upsetting a minority to make a decision that benifits the country.
He needs to grow a set.

tweenie - 07 Sep 2006 12:15 - 760 of 1327

...and heres me thinking it was just a monty python quote.
He's a politician, he lies. Will be no better or worse than his soon to be replacement.
All I wany is the UK to be a UNITED KINGDOM. lead by example. Not preach/pamper to the whims of others.
if we had said, we're going to war in iraq to depose saddam- I would'nt have had a problem with it. The damage was done when no WMD's were found- (for gods-sakes they did'nt even have the nonce to plant some~).
Morals , please were talking about politicians.
LOL

Marc3254 - 07 Sep 2006 13:03 - 761 of 1327

Going to war was an attempt at winning another election.
I Agree we should have gone, blair hid the facts because he didnt have the gumption to be honest. The whole WMD question to me is irrelevant, they got rid of Saddam a WMD on his own.
The people there have never had real freedom, its hard for them to suddenly have it. We take it for granted. This mixed with primary school level education makes it hard for the real people to grasp our systems of government, and to see a real future.

Fred1new - 07 Sep 2006 14:26 - 762 of 1327

How many in this country "grasp our system" etc. ?

Marc3254 - 07 Sep 2006 15:46 - 763 of 1327

lol

richardbees - 08 Sep 2006 14:06 - 764 of 1327

Marc

They understand it but they'll never have it!

The rival Islamic factions will keep fighting each other, killing millions (including foreign troops) and eventually create seperate states from the wrecked remains of Iraq. We should pull out and leave them to it before all our troops are sacrificed to this lost cause.

Islam "the religion of peace"

tweenie - 08 Sep 2006 14:18 - 765 of 1327

Not being funny but when did any war in the name of GOD do anything but result in a lot of dead people?

ALL Religion has a lot to answer for.




Marc3254 - 08 Sep 2006 15:19 - 766 of 1327

Religion has been the cause of more deaths since time began than anything else.
Amazing since religion, I was told, was all about peace understanding and a tolerant way of life.
In iraq most of the fighting is not being done by the iraqi people, but small factions from outside the country, who have hi jacked the situation to fuel there own aims and ideals.
Richard your right, that if the people dont take ownership of thier country then they will be dragged back into the quadmire from which there are emerging.
The west can only do so much. In my opinion this should be limited to establishing the basic infrastructure of a society, including police and goverment, the n pulling out.
The british armed forces are stretched to limits as it is. There is no reserve. If another emergency occurs now britiain will not have the troops to respond. To clarify, if the falklands were invaded today britain could not retake them without the help of NATO.

Fred1new - 08 Sep 2006 16:06 - 767 of 1327

I believe that Bush and Blair consider themselves Christians and the Israeli Prime minister calls himself a Jew.

All went to war and committed murder with GOD ON THEIR SIDES.

I don't think it is the GOD or the religion that is the problem but the abuse that leaders make in the name of religion.

My feeling is that when eventually we withdraw from Iraq we will leave behind chaos and a more unstable Middle East.

I also think that Israel should be made to pay financial retribution for the Atrocities the committed in Lebanon. Also they should be compelled use their personnel to clear the clusters bombs and unexploded armaments they have left.

Iraq and Lebanon will be the legacy of Blair and Bush.

It is good to see at last there are some in the labour party with the moral courage to call for his departure. I hope sooner rather than later.

Monday would do.


hewittalan6 - 08 Sep 2006 16:16 - 768 of 1327

Fred, I believe we agree on the third line!!
Got to say though that the Irael problem goes back before Blair was in power. before he was born in truth!!!
Alan

tweenie - 08 Sep 2006 16:41 - 769 of 1327

then it's agreed...lets declare war on the ultimate terrorist: GOD and those that allegedly represent him.

I feel better already.
:-))))) lol

Kivver - 08 Sep 2006 16:56 - 770 of 1327

Blessed are the meek, oh shut up big nose!!

tweenie - 08 Sep 2006 17:07 - 771 of 1327

well if it's good enuoght for je-hovah


when in rome.........
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

hewittalan6 - 08 Sep 2006 17:08 - 772 of 1327

Yeah, but you trod on my bloody foot.
And you're eating my juniper berries!!!

tweenie - 08 Sep 2006 18:15 - 773 of 1327

your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberries.
organic and packed in biodegradeable packaging- obviously not the hamster...that would be cruel and stupid.

Fred1new - 08 Sep 2006 20:25 - 774 of 1327

Gee!

Kivver - 09 Sep 2006 18:22 - 775 of 1327

C'mon fred, look on the bright side of life!!

barwoni - 11 Sep 2006 07:17 - 776 of 1327

Somalia's Islamic rulers shut down radio station for playing love songs
Sunday September 10, 2006
By SALAD DUHUL
Associated Press Writer
MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) Islamic militants controlling much of southern Somalia shut down a radio station Sunday for playing love songs and other music, the latest step to impose strict religious rule which has sparked fears of an emerging, Taliban-style regime.

Since sweeping to power over much of southern Somalia, including the capital Mogadishu, in June, the Islamists have banned movie viewing, publicly lashed drug users and broke up a wedding celebration because a band was playing and women and men were socializing together.

The group closed Radio Jowhar because the programs were un-Islamic, Islamic official Sheik Mohamed Mohamoud Abdirahman said. It was the only radio station in Jowhar, some 55 miles from Mogadishu.

``It is useless to air music and love songs for the people,'' Abdirahman said.

Said Hagaa Ahmed, Radio Jowhar's director, confirmed the station had been closed but declined further comment.

The Islamic militants have brought a semblance of order to Somalia after years of anarchy.

But the United States accuses the Islamic leaders of harboring al-Qaida militants responsible for deadly bombings at the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.

Jowhar resident Ali Musse said closing the radio station was a violation of freedom.

``This directive is like the Taliban,'' Musse told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. ``It is censorship against independent media and freedom of expression.''

The hardline Islamic Taliban rulers of Afghanistan banned secular music, art, television, and education for girls before they were overthrown by a U.S. invasion in late 2001.

Somalia has not had a police force or judiciary for 16 years since the warlords overthrew longtime dictator Mohamed Siad Barre in 1991 and then turned on each other, carving much of the country into armed camps ruled by violence and clan law.

Somalia has a weak transitional government set up two years ago with U.N. backing, but it has been unable to assert its authority beyond Baidoa, 150 miles northwest of Mogadishu, and could only watch helplessly as Islamic militants seized the capital in June.

(Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Register now or login to post to this thread.