kitosdad
- 12 Dec 2007 16:20
The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 12:11
- 7712 of 8631
Fred this bunch of clowns are like taking candy from a babyMDX re-listing is a done deal
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 12:13
- 7713 of 8631
Mr, Potty give up?got several more verses
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 12:34
- 7714 of 8631
Fred - I could play with numbnuts all day when there's little going on. Sideways market last few days = have some fun. ;-)))))
Not sure there's logic in 7711, Tabatha. My money's certainly making a far better return than subscribing to some "here today, gone tomorrow" outfit run by a bunch of lunatics in a zoo.
I mean we have the farce of Baz and Gaz trying to run the company taking advice from a small percentage of the albeit vociferous shareholders on a public forum. Nobody has ever seen that before in their lives.
What's more, that small proportion are so fragmented they're fighting each other more than trying to save the company. How stupid can they be given their whole lives are riding on success or failure?
Baz and Gaz are on that forum because this is the only option. The SLN has taken a huge hit at the first hurdle, i.e. only raised 1.4m of the 6m considered sufficient to let it survive. As BJM states if the 6m isn't in by the 11th, all bets are off.
Then, we have you arriving to say "Fred this bunch of clowns are like taking candy from a babyMDX re-listing is a done deal", which rather contradicts BJM, who seems to be ever more worried and frustrated. The re-listing can only happen if 6m ends up in the coffers, minimum. That's a fact and they have less than 25% in 50% of the time.
Now, I'll repeat the question - did you or didn't you subscribe?
Further, it seems those he addresses don't have sufficient funds to pour more in and they're trying more and more outlandish combinations to try and keep the thing afloat, including bank loans, credit cards. Jeez, you couldn't make this up.
Gausie
- 28 Jul 2009 12:42
- 7715 of 8631
Hats off to you Barry!
You're playing Tabby and his ilk superbly. They've fallen for your fairy stories hook line and sinker. Fascinated to see what plans you have to manipulate them further, and to continue to part them from their money now that the SCLN looks certain to fail.
Have you already planned the endgame? or do you just have an outline strategy?
Fascinating.
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 13:18
- 7716 of 8631
You mad Scotsmanyou have been telling everyone for their own goodmove on.this company is deadthrowing good money after bad.and so on and so on and so onthen you come up withI presently have no financial interest.I would say that is practically scamming all the good people of MDX.you are no better than Bernie
Gausie .get your mummy to edit that postmust do betterI know Barry far better than yourselfare you forgetting he could have had the company for a songbeginning of this year
Are you forgetting legal procedures ongoing
Are you forgetting his every move is being scrutinised
Are you forgetting he is working for zero at present
Are you forgetting the scln did not include the big players inputincluding Barry/Garry
Are you forgetting the future of the company has already been put in place
Are you forgetting In January Barry/Garry inherited a company with a WUP against it, no NOMAD, 21 loss making companies with huge liabilities, no cash, no sales, and lots of employees doing nothing on high compensation packages. By April, yes April, they presented to shareholders their plans to raise capital. By that time they had restructured the Company, rid the Company of enormous liabilities, cut the workforce to the right size and with the right people to do the job, defeated the WUP, relaunched the Menoflavon brands, formed a JV to manage a film for drinks project, prioritised development projects, got the basis of a new website working, entered discussions with two parties to create a JV for a film production plant, and carried out sufficient investigations to instruct lawyers to commence proceedings against former directorsGausie I would suggest you go back to Mummy and ask her for some amnesia preventative tabletsyou tend to forget an awful lot.
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 13:42
- 7717 of 8631
Gotcha! ;-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Now, I'll repeat the question yet again - did you or didn't you subscribe?
Which bit are you having difficulty with - the reading, the decision process or the writing? It's either a 2-letter or a 3-letter word - "No" or "Yes". My money's on the former, but you daren't say.
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 13:56
- 7718 of 8631
Listen carefullyyou have no standing in any MDX debateyou want the company to failand you hold no sharesand in relationyou are a nobodynot only will you get nothing from meI hope you get nothing from any other investorit is disgraceful that you are scamming all the good people of MDXlow life!now has that registered?.doubt it
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 14:12
- 7719 of 8631
The only person that has scammed the good investors of MDX is you with your pathetic ramping, bringing in many others who believed the tripe you spouted here, there and everywhere. My so-called scamming has been spot on.
Many here pointed to the down side to give a balanced view to your blind ignorance. That argument has been proven absolutely correct beyond any doubt. Has that registered, you incompetent little prat?
BBs are for everyone to express an opinion on any company in the market. You idiots seem to think you have the only right to comment on MDX. Well, thank goodness that isn't the case. I'm sure many have looked objectively at MDX and decided not to invest, which has turned out to be the correct decision.
Meantime you and your clique of fools have dug an ever deeper hole for yourselves, out of which you may not emerge. You thoroughly deserve to be where you are and for all your bluff and bluster you cannot change that.
Oh, and BTW, I can't get anything from someone who has nothing (or very shortly will!).
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 14:17
- 7720 of 8631
Quote of the decadeBig Al - 28 Jul 2009 14:12 - 7719
My so-called scamming has been spot on..it certainly has.
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 14:24
- 7721 of 8631
I'm sure you're the only incompetent prat who can read it like that. Answers my 7717, though. Thanks! ROFLMAO!
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 14:25
- 7722 of 8631
OK, which one best describes Tabatha when he's on the table?
> Five surgeons are discussing who were the best patients to operate on.
>
> The first surgeon says, 'I like to see Accountants on my operating table because when you open them up, everything inside is numbered.'
>
> The second responds, 'Yeah, but you should try Electricians! Everything inside them is colour-coded.'
>
> The third surgeon says, 'No, I really think Librarians are the best; everything inside them is in alphabetical order.'
>
> The fourth surgeon chimes in, 'You know I like Construction Workers. Those guys always understand when you have a few parts left over at the end, and when the job takes longer than you said it would.'
>
> But the fifth surgeon shut them all up when he observed, 'You're all wrong. Politicians are the easiest to operate on. There's no guts, no heart, no balls, no brains, and no spine, and there are only two moving parts - the mouth and the arsehole - and they're interchangeable'
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 14:43
- 7723 of 8631
This post by Edmond is very good, I think.
EdmondJ - 28 Jul'09 - 10:04 - 12246 of 12396
crawford - 28 Jul'09 - 09:07 - 12230 of 12231
eakin,
I'm sorry to see you go, I don't believe you are a lightweight by any means, we need people asking questions as it's clear the silent majority didn't take part the first time.
Most likely, the lack of participation was a mix of: insufficient numbers/projections, to figure what Meldex could be worth; Bridge (and others?) holding back from a commitment to roll into the 10p equity conversion rate; and a strong probability of the shares trading at a discount to that, for a while.
Now that it appears the creditor rollover terms involve 2p equity conversion, it is apparently prompting a rush to avoid severe dilution. At this level however, it does effectively create a write-off for those investors significantly exposed, say at 30p+, who would be better off selling their shares entirely and starting again (if Meldex is judged worthwhile, in terms of ongoing newsflow), utilising a tax loss against portfolio profits (assuming you have or will have them).
At 2p a long-termer could still be incentivised to participate in the SLN since it would protect against any upside (say in the event of commercial good news announced) while dumping the existing holding to secure the tax loss. However the more who do this, the greater prospect of a chaotic after-market which could encourage hard-bitten cynical holders to wait for that.
Fair enough, if 2p is Bridge's assessment of what Meldex equity is worth, including the necessary risk premium. But besides this short-term market issue it compromises long-term upside in Meldex equity when you have 500m to 800m shares in issue. Profit growth would need to be impressive indeed, otherwise Meldex will be branded in the high-risk penny share league for a long while.
Hence on consideration there is a practical case - both in the short and long-term - for a compromise conversion rate of about 5p.
The terms of the offer, requiring shareholder approval, have always left this 'negotiable' until agreed.
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 14:49
- 7724 of 8631
The women surgeons wouldnt operate on you bouncyfar to crudand thanks for confirming how good you are at scamming people
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 15:01
- 7725 of 8631
"far to crud" - Must be some form of foreign language. What is that?
That now gives me another answer to my 7717. First you can't read, now you can't write. Unfortunately we also know about your poor decision-making as well.
So, we've proved in a relatively short space of time that a "Yes/No" question is beyond you. So's investing!! ;-))))
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 15:07
- 7726 of 8631
I think it was Treble who described MDX as a Ponzi scheme. Spot on:
longj0hn - 28 Jul'09 - 13:19 - 12324 of 12415
figure6
How good of an idea do you think it is if the 2p conversion is voted out
Borrow 2.5k from a bank at 20% then lend it out for 4.5%, still think that it is a good idea ?
figure6 - 28 Jul'09 - 13:31 - 12328 of 12415
Wake up longjohn and others.This SLN is being raised on the back of a 2p conversion.If at an EGM it is voted down then most folk who took up the SLN will cry mis-led,wheres my lawyer.Come the EGM it will be made clear that there are 3 options,2p conversion,private placing (at probably 1p or less with none of us participating)or administration.Take your pick.Borrow 2.5k and join in for goodness sake.
The discusion this after noon seems to have extended along the lines of the above posts. As Gausie said "Fascinating" anf a joy to behold. How can so many eejits end up owning a small amount of 1 outfit? Brilliant!
jkd
- 28 Jul 2009 15:11
- 7727 of 8631
BA
how have you confirmed you have scammed anyone? as i recall it was t who suggested it in the first place and you answered and referred to it as 'so called'. and you have been proven right, i think everyone who reads this thread knows who the real scammer is, and it AINT you. LoL
regards
jkd
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 15:11
- 7728 of 8631
Not a foreign language bouncyits the same as being far too thickonly dirtyyou do work in crude dont you? and you are certainly thick..not a bad scammer either...
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 15:22
- 7729 of 8631
jkd - yeah. Reading not Tabatha's strong point.
Now, I'm thinking figure6 might be Tabatha over the road. The following post is definitely almost as jumbled as his. Brilliant! ;-)
figure6 - 28 Jul'09 - 14:40 - 12400 of 12429
The Bull,its an SLN only at the present and it doesn't look like we are going to get any info on conversion.Personally I think the 2p conversion votes are already in the bag but I accept I tend to be over optimistic.(I also would be happy to convert at 10p,2p-10p is fine, I just would like a conversion option between 2p and 10p).
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 15:23
- 7730 of 8631
And up pops Mr. ManwaringJKDlisten carefullyI shall say this only oncebouncy has no standing in any MDX debatehe openly want the company to fail..and people to take painopenly admits this and he holds no shares.taking that into account he has been telling everyone for their own goodmove on.this company is deadthrowing good money after bad.and so on and so on and so onthen he comes up withI presently have no financial interestwhich indicates if he can push the value down still furtherhe might well buy .now I would say that is practically scamming all the good people of MDXwould you not JKD.silly question.weather is nice here in Kent
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 15:28
- 7731 of 8631
Big Al- 28 Jul 2009 15:22 - 7729 of 7730
Now, I'm thinking figure6 might be Tabatha over the road.
Just like the true thicko you areguess everyone on ADV.. Then chirp you were rightwhere have I heard that before?
You are still not right thicko!