Fred1new
- 06 Jan 2009 19:21
Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?
If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?
Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?
What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?
Dailos
- 08 Jan 2009 20:08
- 79 of 6906
Dil
You seen this?
:-)
Fred1new
- 09 Jan 2009 10:32
- 80 of 6906
Dailos, Was he looking at you or you sister when he said it!
8-)
Fred1new
- 09 Jan 2009 10:41
- 81 of 6906
For those who look at BBC4 news, there was an interesting summary of the middle east problems by Jeremy Greenstock. Should be repeated a few times this am.
Ruth
- 09 Jan 2009 10:47
- 82 of 6906
Dil
- 09 Jan 2009 11:02
- 83 of 6906
Who sent you that Ruth ... vary apt :-)
Ruth
- 09 Jan 2009 11:24
- 84 of 6906
I knew youde like it Dil;-)
Martini
- 09 Jan 2009 13:03
- 85 of 6906
Dear o dear Fred the last time I saw you (with MG in tow bless him) I seem to remember opening up the conversation with "Ruth has sent me to give you a slapping"
I fear if I ever make another "Brum meet" I may have to give you a slapping for the whole BB - and I am not sure you are physically up to that!
Come to think of it neither am I!
So please Fed stop being a plonker and save us both some grief.
Fred1new
- 09 Jan 2009 13:15
- 86 of 6906
Martini, I think my response to you was "let me know when you start and I will finish it".
Personal abuse is not an argument.
But views of United Nations don't seem pertinent to the present problems.
Murder and carnage is being carried out in the name of defence.
Tell the bullied to stop it, but allow the bullies to continue!
How much world condemnation does the Israeli government need.
Even America is backing off at the UN.
Crazy.
Gausie
- 09 Jan 2009 13:22
- 87 of 6906
Fred
I think Israel's response to the threat of rocket attacks was: "let me know when you start and I will finish it"
Your double standards are hilarious.
Martini
- 09 Jan 2009 13:23
- 88 of 6906
lol
Gausie
- 09 Jan 2009 13:29
- 90 of 6906
Fred - your arguments are so awful that one has to wonder: Is your campaign funded by the israeli government?
Martini
- 09 Jan 2009 13:30
- 91 of 6906
stop it I am wetting myself and it costs to get my yfronts cleaned here
Fred1new
- 09 Jan 2009 13:34
- 92 of 6906
Gausie, As usual, if you allow yourself to think and even you should be able to understand what I said and why it was said.
I have no animosity to Martini and subsequent to the introduction enjoyed his company. But our introduction to one another was a Martini suggested, I thought it not unreasonable response. I don't like violence but not afraid of it.
Why not go back to the question contained in the heading of this thread.
Gausie
- 09 Jan 2009 13:42
- 93 of 6906
Fred
If you had allowed yourself to think, perhaps you wouldnt have opened this topic on a board where all of the other posters are intelligent people who think for themselves and see right through your smokescreens.
Perhaps it's best you either rethink your position, or go spout your nonsense to the welcoming and gullible sheep on some of the other BBs.
Dil
- 09 Jan 2009 13:47
- 94 of 6906
Someone who knew you well then Ruth ?
:-)
Ruth
- 09 Jan 2009 14:00
- 95 of 6906
Dil;-) very well, in fact too well;-)))
listening to Fred on here has made me realise how monotonous i must sound on the other thread,but my hearts in the right place;-) but the for"s and againsts are probably 50/50 on the other thread re the actual topic itself.
poor Fred hes all alone on this one,and agree with Gausie re Freds double standards,they are enough to make me wet my knickers ,never mind Martini wetting his y-fronts ;-)
Isaacs
- 09 Jan 2009 14:06
- 96 of 6906
The funniest thing is while complaining about personal abuse and wanting to stick to the arguments when pushed Fred reverts to comments like "even you should be able to understand....." - ie I'm clever and you are thick.
Fred1new
- 09 Jan 2009 14:09
- 98 of 6906
Perhaps, my opinion is of no account, but is does appear in line with the United Nations present views. (But I suppose when their opinions differ from yours, their opinions are inconsequential or irrational.)
I suggest you find the recent interview of Jeremy Greenstock on BBC news. Below is a synopsis.
A UN Security Council resolution has called for an immediate ceasefire, access for aid workers and a lasting solution to the conflict, but the Israeli government has rejected it.
Speaking to BBC News, the former UK ambassador to the UN, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, said he hoped Israel would stop military operations soon.
"I think it's a good resolution and needs to be implemented but the Israeli army needs to take decisions on the ground under the Israeli government to implement that resolution," he said.
"The tragedy is this military action was never necessary. There has to be a political route out of the trouble."
Again what I find interesting on some of these threads, is who creeps out of the woodwork and how they group together like pack dogs..
Generally, they seem to resort to personal abuse, hoping it diverts from the main argument.
I wonder why?
Let me repeat once more:
Murder and carnage is being carried out in the name of defence.
Some appear to want to tell the bullied to stop it, but allow the bullies to continue!
How much world condemnation does the Israeli government need.
At the UN, even America is backing off in its support of Israels action.