niceonecyril
- 04 Apr 2009 08:30
niceonecyril
- 19 Feb 2010 10:18
- 833 of 3666
New technology will undoubtably have a major say,but alomg side the existing such as Nuclear,but with an ever increasing population imo it'll take maybe 50yrs? The inferstructure to alter our ways takes time and massive investment is required,so oil,+coal will be with us for a lot longer than 20yrs.
RF take a look at AFC,in the process of building mini power feul cells,50k at 1st with plans to increase to 1MW and have several companies interested including Centrica.
Greekman has a thread running,which will help get you up to speed.
cyril
required field
- 19 Feb 2010 10:24
- 834 of 3666
Already in that one, cheers !...
niceonecyril
- 22 Feb 2010 10:54
- 835 of 3666
Oil almost $80bo, with roughly 20,000bopd to AFR (thats over 1m a day),yet it
still trading in the low 80p's???
Finals in 5 weeks along with promotion to the 250 club,drilling news anyday the only reason i can think of is the market itself??
cyril
aldwickk
- 22 Feb 2010 11:17
- 836 of 3666
Since 1947 Shell, ESSO, Gulf, Standard Oil have all tried and failed to tap the legendary paradise oil fields.
And in 1988 they simply gave up.
But now one tiny explorer has finally cracked the mystery and could spark the biggest oil
bonanza of the next decade!
Even if just ONE of the 22 claims strikes oil,
the value of the company could shoot up
2,044% in a matter of days!
anyone know what company they are talking about ?
cynic
- 22 Feb 2010 11:19
- 837 of 3666
so how come the source of that little gem cannot shed light on same?
given that they gave up in 1988, sounds very much like falklands to me
aldwickk
- 22 Feb 2010 11:37
- 838 of 3666
Is the Falklands a paradise ? bit to cold for me.
Its a tip from Red Hot chilipepper, not to sure about the name of the tip sheet.
cynic
- 22 Feb 2010 11:46
- 839 of 3666
if they are as imprecise as that, then it's not even worth knowing the tip sheet ..... sounds like a load of BS and over-hype anyway, as even if (say) DES find good quantities of oil with their first try, the immediate upside is unlikely to be more than say 1-2, and prob much nearer the lower number
kimoldfield
- 22 Feb 2010 12:35
- 840 of 3666
It sounds a bit like BPC to me.
halifax
- 22 Feb 2010 12:37
- 841 of 3666
kim you are correct.
kimoldfield
- 22 Feb 2010 12:38
- 842 of 3666
Do I get a prize? :o)
halifax
- 22 Feb 2010 12:39
- 843 of 3666
only if you buy their shares.
kimoldfield
- 22 Feb 2010 12:44
- 844 of 3666
Already holding some. :o)
kimoldfield
- 22 Feb 2010 12:44
- 845 of 3666
Pure gamble though!
halifax
- 22 Feb 2010 12:46
- 846 of 3666
absolutely, but Statoil are involved so there is a degree of "respectability".
kimoldfield
- 22 Feb 2010 12:47
- 847 of 3666
Yes, that is what prompted me to take a flutter really.
TheFrenchConnection
- 22 Feb 2010 18:52
- 848 of 3666
lf its even on a tipsheet its either to late to get in or someone wants to offload a shedfull...........
TheFrenchConnection
- 22 Feb 2010 19:28
- 849 of 3666
despite all the huffing and puffing in current trading and hence s/p s/p l see nothing but a VERY rosy picture ahead ..Havent felt this good about a share since re-searching JKX,TLW and DNX and when both TLW and JKX were in the 34p 39p bracket and DNX @ 200p level . lts healthy to see big buys and sells in a share on its way up. Very healthy. in that scenario you avoid the froth and eventual bubble sheesh Run by an ex mandarin of OPEC. Can anyone even suggest this man is not in the loop ....Once it breaches 100p -slowly surely as it is now. it will soon enter that period of which celebrated historian Prof E Hobsbawm called "the take off into self sustained growth" ,,,,,,, too many big reputations on the line for this to fail .......
cynic
- 22 Feb 2010 19:49
- 850 of 3666
you do talk a load of shit sometimes in your phoney franglais verbosity! .... sp has already breached 100 previously, and stayed there - just look at the chart!
TheFrenchConnection
- 22 Feb 2010 20:56
- 851 of 3666
didnt stay there tho smartass / no support there ./, hit a brick wall. went up too fast on low(ish) . volume.
HARRYCAT
- 22 Feb 2010 21:19
- 852 of 3666
What happened to all the 72/73p predictions (as per posts #818/819 etc) ?????