Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

How to profit from Betting Exchanges (BEX)     

Scripophilist - 27 Oct 2004 23:40


ladder.gifBA_Logo.gif


How would you like to trade a market where you get large regular price swings every 10 minutes in the afternoon, seven days a week. A
market where all prices are set purely by supply and demand, few transaction costs, no middle men and you only pay commission if you win? Where you can freely act as a market maker and where you have direct market access and where you can create a spread for others to take?

Betfair has revolutionised the betting market and created an open platform for exchanging risk on sports events. This market is now viewed much more like a traditional financial risk market than an old fashioned betting market. Smart users have realised that there are huge opportunities on Betfair because they can buy and sell risk in much the same way they would in a normal financial market but without the burden of cost or the restricted access that is usually associated with traditional financial markets.

Click here to learn more


jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 16:39 - 84 of 10502

Scrip
4.0

No backers at the mo, just layers at 4.0, 3.5, 1.62

Kayak - 01 Nov 2004 16:53 - 85 of 10502

Scrip, what do you mean by a "tick"? E.g. from 1.34 to 1.35, or 6.0 to 6.2, on BF?

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 17:07 - 86 of 10502

Kayak, Yes, 3.05-3.10, 1.80-1.81 etc. I have found if you do not equalise your risk according to the tick size you are unable to balance your risk longer term.

Kayak - 01 Nov 2004 17:12 - 87 of 10502

Oh. Then I had a good day :-))

13.00 +13
13.10 No activity
13.20 -6
13.30 No activity
13.40 +7
13.50 +6
14.00 +13
14.10 +0
14.20 +9
14.30 +0
14.40 +3
14.50 +7
15.00 +4
15.10 +6
15.20 +8
15.30 -6
15.40 +8
15.50 +9
16.00 +0
16.10 -13

Total +68

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 17:17 - 88 of 10502

Probably at my expense :(

I didn't really get it together today. Still there is the football tonight.

jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 17:46 - 89 of 10502

Slow market the financial bets

Fundamentalist - 01 Nov 2004 19:55 - 90 of 10502

Good job kayak - well done!!!!

Steph - good to see you attending the course

Jeff - hope you are right - im short ftse futures from the close and could do with a drop in the dow

jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 20:10 - 91 of 10502

Laid off my bet, so if Dow is up I'm level, if its down I win. Looks like up tho

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 20:10 - 92 of 10502

Greened up on Man City vs Norwich before kick off so a win whatever happens during the match.

Fundamentalist - 01 Nov 2004 20:14 - 93 of 10502

greened up scrip ????

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 20:22 - 94 of 10502

Missed the chance to grab a screen shot as Man City 1-0 up already. See the England Poland example in the top right hand corner. The P&L is green on each line so I win whatever the result. The process to achieve this is nicknamed, "Greening up"

jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 20:27 - 95 of 10502

Script
Been trying to Green up but never seem to quite get there. Will have to attend a course.

One thing, the way you bet, do you need to have a substantial sum deposited with betfair (1000+)

Is it a case of big stake small margin

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 20:44 - 96 of 10502

jeff, You need to turn it on its head. Work on the basis of "I want to win X", I measure mine per tick. Then that defines your bank. You would start when you are learning at maybe 1 a tick then increase that as your confidence grows. Over time the capital I have at Betfair has grown quite a lot so I take large positions when I am confident that the position will mature.

Kayak - 01 Nov 2004 21:02 - 97 of 10502

jeffmack

I developed this formula to "green up". I have it programmed on a programmable calculator for convenience, but you could translate it to a spreadsheet formula. It looks a little forbidding but once you get the hang of it, it is simple to use and covers a lot of situations. Most importantly you can use it whatever the state of your book at the time. You don't need to know the overall back or lay that you are trying to close (which would not be obvious if you have carried out a string of backs and lays).

STAKE=CLOSEDOWN*(-(1-TOUP)*UP+(1+TOUP)xDOWN)/(2*TOUP-(1+TOUP)*ODDS)+(1-CLOSEDOWN)*((1-TOUP)*UP-(1+TOUP)*DOWN)/(2*TOUP+(1-TOUP)*ODDS)

Where:

"up" represents the top line on Betfair for a two-outcome event, or the outcome you are trading for a multiple outcome event, "down" represents the bottom line on Betfair for a two-outcome event, or the rest of the field for a multiple outcome event

CLOSEDOWN = 1 if you want to use the bottom line to "green up", 0 if you want to use the top line
TOUP = 0 if you want to "green up" totally, 1 (100%)if you want to move all the profit/loss to the top line, -1 (-100%) if you want to move all the profit/loss to the bottom line, .3 if you want to move 30% to the top, etc. etc.
UP = the amount you currently have as profit(+)/loss(-) on the top
DOWN = the amount you currently have as profit(+)/loss(-) on the bottom
ODDS = the odds you wish to "green up" at
STAKE = the stake you should back or lay to green up at those odds (be careful of the direction, which will however be obvious from your book)

The formula will "green up" as well as "red up" if you are actually in loss. As in trading, it is a lot more difficult to "red up" (take a loss) than "green up" (take a profit)!

So for instance if you have +105 on the top and -50 on the bottom, and odds of 1.4 are available on the top,

CLOSEDOWN = 0
TOUP = 0
UP = 105
DOWN = -50
ODDS = 1.4

which will give you a stake to lay of 110.71 at 1.4 to "green up" fully, giving you 60.71 profit top and bottom.

jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 21:16 - 98 of 10502

Kayak
Thanks, I will try to decipher it.

Managed to get in a win all ways situation after the Norwich equaliser. After the Man City goal I back Norwich at 18.5, so laid some off.

Scripophilist - 01 Nov 2004 21:27 - 99 of 10502

Kayak, that's dreadfully complicated! To green up you simply divide your line P&L by the current lay odds.

Jeffmack, I can send you a spreadsheet if you wish. Drop me an email.

jeffmack - 01 Nov 2004 21:39 - 100 of 10502

Script
Message sent via MAM, thanks

Kayak - 01 Nov 2004 21:43 - 101 of 10502

The formula is complicated Scrip, but it is buried in my calculator and I never see it. It handles partial greening up and also e.g. backing the opposite side rather than laying. All things you could work out by hand but it would increase the potential for errors. Also it forces me to think in terms of top and bottom on the screen which again removes a lot of the potential for errors. I'm sure I'm not alone in having occasionally backed rather than layed or backed the top outcome rather than the bottom.

Sonofagun - 01 Nov 2004 23:49 - 102 of 10502

I think I'll do the degree course first or maybe nightschool-1 day sure as hell won't cover it:)

DocProc - 02 Nov 2004 09:21 - 103 of 10502

I do think that, at first, the concepts involved are quite difficult to grasp. I devised for myself some calculations to do as 'exercises'. They helped me to get my head round things more easily.

eg, A 'Bet' has been placed on the Democrats to win the USA Election. After a time the odds change for both 'Bet' and 'Lay' and the following position is resultant:-

Republicans: Bet 1.71 / Lay 1.73
-100.00

Democrats: Bet 2.36 / Lay 2.4
300.00

Starting from a position like this, one can then work out what would be effect made to it after doing various sizes of Bets and Lays to each of the two sides and what would happen with a particular event result.

Next, one can add a third 'political party' (runner, player, etc) and do similar exercises.

Eventually, the concepts become much easier to understand and you begin to be able to spot the potential for the doing of various things. I suppose doing this kind of stuff just made me that bit more familiar with it.

I'm afraid I couldn't understand the two 'points' lists above and Kayaks formula lost me completely. I think they assume the reader (me) has possession of various types of other basic information. For me this assumption was incorrect. :-)
Register now or login to post to this thread.