overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
David10B
- 29 May 2007 16:31
- 917 of 2037
Hardly old chap I am headed to show you all--once and for all that this is a poor management in action, who have opened and kept open loss making stores as to close them would cause so many problems.
Firstly they paid too much for them.
And secondly to close them in such a short time period would be a loss of business confidence.
Empik has the lenght and breadth on COH and it not my fault that you can not see that.
Since I sarted posting here in respnse to AdieH blantant ramping of this share it has gone the only way it can.
Sure Mr Worthington has done a good marketing job that has influence the SP, but that has to be supported and its not the sare price is now reacting and today its down just as I said it would be,
IT HAS TO FALL AS THERE IS NOTHING TO HOLD IT UP---JUST WATCH.
CYNIC
I REGRET BEING A PAIN IN THE BUTT, BUT I DID SAY AGES AGO TO LET THE SP DO THE TALKING!
BUT THEY WERE NOT CONTENT AT THAT AS ITS BEEN TELLING THEN SINCE ITS IS DOWNER----THEIR POSTS NOW ARE JUST RED HERRINGS.
ptholden
- 29 May 2007 16:42
- 918 of 2037
10B
I think it would be fair to point out that your constant references to MLR on this thread constitute ramping and that your long repetitve negative posts on COH constitute bashing.
But, whatever, just adding a little grist to the mill :)
pth
David10B
- 29 May 2007 17:13
- 919 of 2037
Yes you are right Mr Holden perfectly right.
I am indeed bashing COH.
I think its an opportunist company that is taking too much off its loyal shareholders and its going to crash.
That is my honest opinion and the SP tends to support it.
You see for despite all the news the SP is still being gravitated toward the 20s
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MLR, how can you posibly ramp up a company than has given its shareholders almost 100% sustainable growth in less than a year.
How can you ramp a company that has just done a cracking deal which has seen its profits rise?
How can you ramp a company that has first class products, top quality management, well respected international markets and some of the most highly respected associates in the business--------How can you ramp such a company?----you tell me please.
I think the company speaks for itself, I just make a few fully justified attention drawing comments being the sharholder and supporter that I am as like a little jam on all tasty things.
How many shareholders invite other people to find a fault with their particular share and then further ask them to come on this BB knock it.( you wont find a lot of that on any BB, where people are unjustly protective of their investment and immediately knock anyone who has a bad word or perhaps even an innocent question)
I can, and I did and so far there are no replies as anyone with any understanding of these things can see a real solid company and a massive upside.
MLR WILL STAND BOLDLY ON ITS MERITSI
MLR is a millionaire maker.
COH, well perhaps that too could make you a nillionaire, its all your choice.
But time will tell-- as it always does.
ptholden
- 29 May 2007 17:16
- 920 of 2037
You answered your own questions!
bmw325
- 29 May 2007 17:30
- 921 of 2037
pth
He has been slagging off COH since they were 18p....LOL.
David10B
- 29 May 2007 17:31
- 922 of 2037
Nothing like being open.
bmw325
- 29 May 2007 17:33
- 923 of 2037
...and being a lying towrag.
proteus
- 29 May 2007 17:34
- 924 of 2037
So to sumarise where we are 10B.
You say the price is going to drop but you have provided no figures to back up your claim.Indeed you say you would look a fool if you tried ! I have tried to help you understand the accounts and help you with your difficulties and eventually you pick on a figure you that no company provides and isn't necessary and say that figure is your ' proof '.Do you understand what an average means,do you want help with that as well ? Strange call to say ' I don't know what the figure is but it is the corner stone of my arguement.' Before we move on are there any more figures that you have no idea about but back up your beliefs ?
O/T If your analysis is so weak why should anyone look at another company you're promoting.If you cannot provide figures you are enticing people to do no more than take pot luck.You may get lucky once or twice based on others analysis but long term you will lose money.
AdieH
- 29 May 2007 18:38
- 925 of 2037
SQUELCH HIM FOR YOUR OWN PEACE OF MIND, THE GUY IS A CRETIN AND A FOOL AND SHOULD BE REMOVED BUT THE FACILITATOR IS FAILING TO DO HIS JOB. REGARDS. PROBABLY ALSO IN SEO BUT WON'T ADMIT IT NOW THAT IS A FAILING COMPANY...
David10B
- 29 May 2007 19:04
- 926 of 2037
Yes of course you are right its all pot luck and I know nothing so I just come along and guess the SP will fall.
No bad is it.
And yes I need help as I cant read the COH accounts so please continue to do so.
I really know nothing about COH what so ever.
But what I do know is that based on a family member having a few fast food franchises is that if they do not make the magic 1000 pounds a week nett then they can not get any quality franchisors interested in investing .
How COH investors seem quite content to throw their money into COH' coffers unquestioning is beyond me and I guess they must still be in a fantasy heaven.
There is good reason why COH has not made any profit since its conception and that is that its all wrong...Empik thought so and walked and they are there on the ground.
To me it looks like Mr Worhting failed in the UK, then took as much as he could, and went to Poland, then after a few years there and a mountain of debt in high interest bearing notes as he was only buying leases and bank perfer freeholds, then came back for more money to pay then off and the shareholders gave it to him. At that time COH had not made a profit, it was all a gamble.
But then I know nothing.
According you COH shareholders I am a cretin, a lying towrag and whatever else you like to say or call me.
So with all that done a dusted. I know suggest that we leave the SP do both the talking and proving.
Frankly now I have lost interest in COH, although that said its a lucky company to have such blind loyal shareholders. But I am not interest in you lot.
Its the uninitiated newcomers I feel a pity for, like those who listened to the incessant ramping and bought in a 50p and there were loads of them
Those buying in over 40p are in for a tough time as the competition is coming and growing.
Those buying in around 50p have my condolences
Indigenous local and Turkish coffee chains are enetering the market place. Starbucks, CFE and many more will be there soon. COH with its few outlets will struggle to make ends meet.
My opinion is that its a loser.
If I am wrong then I am wrong.
However, if I am right press button B to try to get back what money you can.
Its darts tonight, have fun and dont worry to much, I will and I dont.
proteus
- 29 May 2007 19:12
- 927 of 2037
I've no idea whether 1000 / wk net is good or bad.Is this a UK figure or are your family in Poland.What is a reasonable figure for Poland ? Do you have any figures for Polish stores.If not your figures are meaningless.
proteus
- 29 May 2007 23:07
- 928 of 2037
For you cynic,
Here are some figures for gross margin.GM as a percentage sales has increased year on year from 04 - 19.8%,21.4%,22.8% and at H1 24.2% COH take raw materials but also other shop costs as variable costs eg labour.Sales / established store are around 200k.As volumes increase you do not necessarily have to increase staff as to a point they just serve more cups / employee.So as volumes increase the GM should increase as the labour costs will not increase proportionately.Also as volumes increase their buyers should be able to get a better price.COH said sales for this financial year will be 10.2m and sales are set to increase 50% in the coming year. i.e. 15.3m sales next year.IF the GM continues its improvement with volume next year they could see 25.6% GM. RW has said he has 25% as a target.So GM for 2007 should be 2.4m and for 2008 3.9m.
cynic
- 30 May 2007 07:02
- 929 of 2037
i shall be buying neither COH nor CFE as i think they are far too small and will go belly-up in due course
David10B
- 30 May 2007 08:32
- 930 of 2037
Proteus well done old chap, you too can can get a pretty good idea from RW who is first class at saying this that and the other, but nothing on Nett profits and that where the whole show falls down.
The art of busines is to extract the best prosible nett from the gross.
I doubt though, and very much so, if COH can even begin to match the fantasic sales projection figures, as no one ever mentions the increasing competition in their calculations.
Forecasting targets are OK, I have no problem with any encomic modeling games, but as we are are aware there are so many intangibles to consider when practicing this highly speculative art.
But come Sir, let us not banter any further, there are other dragons to slay, and besides these matters are best left for the market to postulate over the fate of COH.
Indeed the market called it down yesterday. I wonder if your time, and obvious expertise, would be better spent in considering if this is the continuation of the downward tread pattern, and if so at what stage to step out?
Have a really nice day.
David10B
- 30 May 2007 08:41
- 931 of 2037
Good post from George on iii(with full acknowledgement)
Its a pity that Mr Worthington was not so forthcoming over the EMPIK dumping!
From iii
Re: Starbucks George889
Communication with small private shareholders is an honourable quality in the leader of COH but playing devil's advocate may be he shouldn't be used on such a regular basis just to clarify or settle various points emanating from this forum
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
proteus
- 30 May 2007 10:02
- 932 of 2037
10B
If you give no figures you have no credability.Do you want more help ? Don't sulk,as someone from the education field you should know the benefits of being educated.
cynic
No problem,I don't know which way it will go but at least an analysis helps.On what basis to you state it will go belly up or CFE for that matter?
David10B
- 30 May 2007 11:26
- 933 of 2037
No need for further comment, kindly use the NUMIS figures and then deduct 99%
proteus
- 30 May 2007 11:29
- 934 of 2037
Come now 10b do you understand percentages or do you need a little more help.% is not just a button you press on a calculator. Do you need help with the concept of averages I can help there as well.
David10B
- 30 May 2007 11:47
- 935 of 2037
no real need for further comment is there as you will not be expounding upon anything that is not already well within the public domain!
However, please carry on if you wish.
proteus
- 30 May 2007 11:58
- 936 of 2037
OK I agree we can only discuss what's in the public domain or do you have other information ? Now taking your figure of 99%,that means your estimate is 1% of the Numis value for NPV - That's net present value.They calculate 66p / share so your figure is 0.66p / share.At the last set of results they had cash equivalent to 2.5p / share.Surely they cannot be worth less than their cash. Do you need help with your calculations ,they're not difficult you know ?