goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
required field
- 09 May 2015 10:53
- 59981 of 81564
I'm not surprised the Lib-Dems have beed decimated : their policies are just rubbish !.....but in a democracy ; you need an opposition....perhaps Labour will now put forward better and more sensible ideas for the next election ! in five years time.......though I doubt it as they are just stuck in a backward out of date mentality......what did I hear on the result from some of their supporters ; that they needed much more lefty policies.....they just won't learn will they ?......
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 11:35
- 59982 of 81564
Which bozo, Muppet, geek, lefty will the unions pick for Labour leader this time?
aldwickk
- 09 May 2015 12:49
- 59983 of 81564
The Labour bonus for us was Harriet Harman resigning. Best chance of a Labour comeback would be Alan Johnson as leader
Paddy Ashdown on QT was a pompous twat, why can't he keep is eye's open
John Snow was good on Have I got news , someone said Vince Cable had his bike stolen outside while waiting for the results, and he said that was two seat's he lost that night
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 12:56
- 59984 of 81564
Alan Johnson is a nice guy, but not leader material. I would be happy with him as he would be easy to beat.
The unions might like him as he claims to be a Marxist and supporter of the Communist party. Another lefty would be the kiss of death for Labour.
aldwickk
- 09 May 2015 13:22
- 59986 of 81564
And his the right colour for the ever growing non white voter
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 13:23
- 59987 of 81564
Is he acceptable to the unions?
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 13:24
- 59988 of 81564
I think it is Ummuna.
aldwickk
- 09 May 2015 14:03
- 59989 of 81564
Don't think he would be acceptable to the unions
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 16:20
- 59991 of 81564
I look upon Scotland as just northern England etc. Nicola thinks she is going to stop austerity. She has no chance. What the public wanted was more austerity. The peoole in work are gradually doing better and expected that to accelerate. Austerity is a very popular policy. Recent polling showed more than 70% were in favour.
Priority will be given to constituency boundary changes which will cost Labour dearly at the next selection, making it even more difficult to be elected. The referendum legislation will be passed sooner rather than later (probably this year).
Miliband was rejected due to more factors than could be overlooked.
He was a complete embarrassment
He was too left wing
His party was not trusted on the economy
He was opposed to a referendum on the EU
His judgement was clearly in question after the monolith
He was expected to borrow and tax again
He was tainted by being part of Brown's workers
He stabbed his brother in the back
He was in the pockets of the unions
ExecLine
- 09 May 2015 18:01
- 59993 of 81564
I felt a need to check up on what 'goverment austerity spending' actually is and what the term means. Apparently, there are also degrees of 'austerity spending' too.
More at:
http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6254/economics/what-is-austerity/
MaxK
- 09 May 2015 18:18
- 59994 of 81564
There's nowt so strange as folk.
Emily Thornberry (elected)
Labour Party
51%
22,547
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 18:51
- 59995 of 81564
If the Tories had done the soon to come boundary changes before the election, they would have had 53% of the commons as opposed to Labour on 35%.
Labour are already crying foul. The intention is to reduce the commons from 650 to 690 seats. The effects are as follows:
The figures for English regions are given below (percentage reductions in brackets):
North East to lose three seats (-10%)
North West to lose seven seats (-9%)
West Midlands to lose five seats (-8%)
Yorkshire and the Humber to lose four seats (-7%)
London to lose five seats (-7%)
South West to lose two seats (-4%)
East Midlands to lose two seats (-4%)
Eastern England to lose to seats (-3%)
South East to lose one seat (-1%).
The reason is that the constituencies are not equal. The Conservaticpves need to get far more votes to get an MP elected than Labour due to the imbalance between urban and rural populations for each seat.
The aim is to make each constituency contain 76,641 voters within 5%.
MaxK
- 09 May 2015 19:11
- 59996 of 81564
What about the jocks?
A tad over represented??
MaxK
- 09 May 2015 19:16
- 59997 of 81564
The jocks appear to be on about 71k per mp.
Haystack
- 09 May 2015 20:26
- 59998 of 81564
There are 68,475 voters per constituency in Scotland.
4,040,000 registered voters for 59 seats.
So to get the balance right with the rest of the UK, they need to reduce their number to 53 seats.
cynic
- 09 May 2015 21:12
- 59999 of 81564
in the 1950/60s, there was a common slogan of "better red than dead"
i see that the two hard-left militant unions (unite and aslef), who of course are (the) major paymasters of the labour party, are clamouring for the resignation of jim murphy, leader of the scottish labour party, blaming him for their woes
you will recollect that neil findlay, a hard-left socialist, was the unions choice and they subsequently refused to back jim murphy at all
to my mind, it is the union leaders who should resign, for clearly their quasi-marxist doctrines, foisted on their puppet EM, have been rejected by the uk's electorate, and it is they who do not understand (or perhaps even care) what is wanted by the electorate at large
their slogan should perhaps be reworded as, "better red AND dead"
cynic
- 09 May 2015 21:17
- 60000 of 81564
next labour leader
if i were a labour supporter, i would be supporting tristram hunt, for he certainly has the right pedigree and presents exceedingly well
second choice would be chuka umunna, though he is perhaps too young to take on the mantle - and it is very questionable if the average labour party member would support a non-white leader.