Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


hewittalan6 - 02 Aug 2006 08:33 - 18361 of 27111

Just had pause for thought time.
i have read LW's comments on todays traders thread, and I realise that I could say much the same thing, though not over the same timescale.
Kinda fits with my "full and Frank discussion" of the other day with mr Aldwickk.
These blue sky tiddlers are great for somewhere to stick your top-slices or divis from real stocks, but the simple idea of reinvestment works every time, on average.
A sobering thought, and a reminder not to get too heavily invested in this kind of stock. keep it simple, keep it small, and hope you will have more hits than misses, but above all make sure that these are only a very small part of your portfolio.
Enough doom and gloom though. i'm still a believer, but it shows why some sleep on a night and others sweat it out.
Alan

oblomov - 02 Aug 2006 09:00 - 18362 of 27111


Easily said, though Alan.

I expect most of us began our investment in SEO in a small way, as you describe, and built up stock as the SP climbed and each RNS sucked us in with a picture of great things to come. If the information in the RNS's had been genuine the situation should be completely different by now. Pleased to say SEO are a very small part of my portfolio, but even so, no-one likes to lose so much on one stock.

Perhaps the lesson is that you cant rely on RNS's from small caps - the managers in small caps get carried away in a situation new to them.

Does anyone know if action has ever been taken against companies issuing a trail of misleading information? Not that I'm saying (yet) that SEO has - this could all still turn around and our expectations could still be realised.

greekman - 02 Aug 2006 09:17 - 18363 of 27111

Morning all,

I agree with both (ALAN and OB's) comments.
I like many have SEO as a small portion of my investments, but yes due to vague info I also admit to being sucked in a bit deeper than intended.
As to action taken re companies giving out misleading info....I can recall several instances every year (unfortunately no names spring to mind) but there was that large Insurance group about 12/18 months ago, and I am sure someone will come back with info re several examples.

bosley - 02 Aug 2006 09:53 - 18364 of 27111

oblo, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. ii was right all along, much as it pains me to say so. if you look at the wording of the rns' you will find that there are a lot of non-commitals, "expect to" and "anticipates". there are very few definates. the vagueness of the announcements gives them a get-out clause.
unlike many of you i did end up with most of my eggs in the seo basket. thankfully, i got away with it and wont be so stupid again. as to the arguement that long term and boring is more profitable than blue sky and risky , i am half rice half chips on that as i have made and lost on both. my best investments have been seo and asos for blue sky and tesco for blue chip, (scrip divis are wonderful long term). there are one or two dogs, (ok, more than one or two), that i hope have taught me a lesson in pot preservation.

hewittalan6 - 02 Aug 2006 10:00 - 18365 of 27111

bosley - 02 Aug 2006 09:53 - 18364 of 18364
oblo, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

Isn't that a Paul McCartney lyric? " Hopalong, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on".
Must go - the phone is ringing. that will be Mr McCartneys lawyers right now.

Oilywag - 02 Aug 2006 10:17 - 18366 of 27111

For rmhyams

Thanks. I'll be truce to you, if you are truce to me.

Here, have a kiss on both your cheeks. And if we stay nice to one another for a while, I'll give you kiss on the cheeks on either side of your nose as well.

lol(ling about)

The oily one

Oilywag - 02 Aug 2006 12:24 - 18367 of 27111

Seems like that blizzard of posts on five pages yesterday has exhausted the kiddywinkles!

And, as they say in the New Zafira tv commercial .... "oh, they're tired!"

Hope the share price does not go the same way as the box full of "my mother gave us that!" crockery.

The oily one

soul traders - 02 Aug 2006 12:28 - 18368 of 27111

Oily,


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


oblomov - 02 Aug 2006 13:19 - 18369 of 27111

I've always thought that , if Heather wanted to marry a pop star, she should have married David Cassidy. I wont add the punch line - Mrs McCartney's lawyers may be watching!

oblomov - 02 Aug 2006 13:21 - 18370 of 27111


Oh, publish and be damned! She would then have been known as Hopalong Cassidy, but you'd guessed that, I'm sure.

Tonyrelaxes - 02 Aug 2006 13:22 - 18371 of 27111

Yes, its sad how quickly relationships break down when it comes to money matters. I heard he gave her a plane for Christmas.

Very penny pinching.

He really should have added some Immac for the other one.

oblomov - 02 Aug 2006 13:32 - 18372 of 27111



I somehow cant imagine her having a great passion for carpentry, though, Tony!

Tonyrelaxes - 02 Aug 2006 14:55 - 18373 of 27111

I think we have sickened everyone off, Oblo.
Just fully remembered it and amended my last post!

hewittalan6 - 02 Aug 2006 14:58 - 18374 of 27111

I'm here.
Just enjoying a rather good day or two on stocks that no-one else is interested in!!!

oblomov - 02 Aug 2006 15:07 - 18375 of 27111



No reply yet from SEO, Kim? (Or anyone else).

Oilywag - 02 Aug 2006 15:35 - 18376 of 27111

Alan

Are you doing smug with your post 18374?

The oily one

hewittalan6 - 02 Aug 2006 15:40 - 18377 of 27111

Nope.
Just very very happy.
Got a couple of shares that I try to interest others in, but to no avail.
they are a little bit too much like real companies for these boards!!!
HYC - Going up, looking good and a golden cross on the way, and
BBC- poor 12 months but a vrey good few days, including interims that show an increased divi.
Honestly worth a look, but i am the only one who inhabits the threads on these.
Alan

driver - 02 Aug 2006 16:32 - 18378 of 27111

Al
Stop trying to tempt us to your bbc thread it wont work, you forgot dcm.

cynic - 02 Aug 2006 16:35 - 18379 of 27111

concur with you re HYC ..... just posted ther

pinnacle - 02 Aug 2006 17:32 - 18380 of 27111

MESSAGE FOR SSANEBS

Refering to your posts 18006 and 18010.

How confident did Ian B sound?

The comments re: Asda and the financing.

I would like to discuss with you.
Register now or login to post to this thread.