TullettJ (MoneyAM)
- 21 Apr 2006 08:36
Hello.
Further to the problems we were having a few weeks ago, we've been working on a new system architecture and it's now (I think) ready for some load testing.
Functionally we've been using it for the last week, and it's identical to the live site: running from the same databases (so the bulletin boards on it have live data, and any posts made to them appear on the main site etc etc)
If you would like to test this new site, you'll need to do the following:
Delete your MoneyAM cookies from your browser (in Firefox you can do that from the Tools/Options/Privacy menu, in IE the easiest way is to 'delete cookies' from the Tools / Internet options menu (note: you'll delete
all your cookies this way!))
Point your web browser to:
http://test.moneyam.com/
Start using that site.
The deleting of your MoneyAM cookies is vital, else you won't be able to log into the new site (you'll keep getting directed back to the login screen).
Also, if you then want to start using the main site again (http://www.moneyam.com), you'll need to go through the delete cookies routine again. Due to them running different software versions, the cookies are not compatiable.
If this sounds like I'm trying to put you of testing, then I'm sorrry, but I need to make the limitations clear to mitigate lots of questions along those lines.
If you do decide to test the new site, please post below so I know you're doing it and post any feedback that you may have (any errors you get for instance)
Many thanks,
J.
Ps: this post was created on the test site, as proof they're running on the same backend databases.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 08:57
- 2 of 72
Jon - testing with firefox - all seems OK, except with js debug switched on, am getting the following on virtually every screen:
uncaught exception: Permission denied to call method Location.toString
Mega Bucks
- 21 Apr 2006 09:01
- 3 of 72
Working fine here on Fire Fox.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 10:00
- 6 of 72
Click on l2 icon from stockwatch fails with The requested URL //redirectStockWatchL2.jsp was not found on this server.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 10:19
- 7 of 72
CSS containing .term, 'font' entry
Someone can't spell pt
also CSS - color for td.fundamentalsDataRowTitles - surely that needs a # prefix
;o)
Cloudbase
- 21 Apr 2006 10:30
- 8 of 72
Jonathon.......I've just logged in to test and its much faster on IE 6, is that because there's less users or will it be faster on release?
Mega Bucks
- 21 Apr 2006 10:42
- 11 of 72
Have it running under IE and FireFox at the moment,seems stable,but still early days yet :-)
Mega...
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 10:59
- 14 of 72
jon - a good argument re pt v px. fails on a key point though - px is not permitted CSS syntax for a font size. (Line 479 of moneystyle)
Color - line 642 of moneystyle.css - I think the value was 333399 likely intended as a set of RGB hex pairs.
Dailos
- 21 Apr 2006 11:03
- 15 of 72
As a master of all things technical, i agree with what Gausie says above ;-)
TullettJ (MoneyAM)
- 21 Apr 2006 11:13
- 16 of 72
Gausie,
px is not permitted CSS syntax for a font size
What complete and utter bollocks! I think you need to refresh your knowledge of CSS, we have a book here that you can borrow, it's called 'My Very First CSS Book' and it's by Tomy.
For 'proof' that px is a valid declaration, I urge you to view the
validation of my fundamentals CSS page wherein you will see valid 'px' declations for fonts.
So ner :P
I'll get the other color thing fixed, that is an error. Thanks for pointing it out.
J.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 11:25
- 18 of 72
Jon - well said - I will not have Dailos jumping on me.
Thanks for the link. When you get a mo, I'd urge you to take a look at
CSS validation failure for the page in question rather than the somewhat irrelevant one you point to above.
It flags up the two errors I described plus a fresh one.
Re the error in line 478 - perhaps its the slash rather than the px that is the problem ? In any event, it's the only line in the production CSS that uses px rather than pt for a font size. And you've made rather a good case to change all the others .....
Do you mind awfully if I close this post without hurling any personal abuse back at you? Or is such abuse obligatory?
;o)
Martini
- 21 Apr 2006 11:48
- 19 of 72
Shame I was enjoying that.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 11:53
- 20 of 72
f*ck off, you long haired cripple.
:o)
ps - if you can still make the recording of QI on Monday I have a spare ticket and have cleared it with Sam.
chocolat
- 21 Apr 2006 11:59
- 21 of 72
Well I was still waiting for JT to tell me what to do with my cookies.
But I've just stumbled upon 'My Very First Cookie Book'.
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 12:31
- 23 of 72
only in attitude
:o)
ps - before you ship me the tomy book, what does it say about slashes? or color codes?
Mega Bucks
- 21 Apr 2006 14:11
- 25 of 72
I have stockwatch open in FireFox in Test mode,when i click on the RTR news flag,nothing happens,but when you click it in normal mode its OK,is this a problem you are aware of ???
Mega...
Gausie
- 21 Apr 2006 14:35
- 27 of 72
Derek - dropped you an internal email
Martini
- 21 Apr 2006 14:38
- 28 of 72
Oowaa QI will ring G
M
DocProc
- 22 Apr 2006 17:01
- 33 of 72
chocolat
- 22 Apr 2006 22:41
- 35 of 72
Indeedy JT - sounds like you're a few window displays short of a screenshop :)
Iain
- 23 Apr 2006 13:16
- 37 of 72
http://test.moneyam.com/TradersRoom/posts.php?page=234&tid=1
It was on the bugs thread.Others have the same problem
"Not sure if its an unintended bug or a clever enhancement, but.......
When i open Stockwatch and roll my mouse over the watch list, the list gets surrounded by a hatched line. If i then click anywhere on the list it automaticly centres itself on screen. Saves me having to scroll, but I've never seen it before."
Alan
Screenshot sent
Mega Bucks
- 24 Apr 2006 09:04
- 42 of 72
J,seems stable,using it on IE and FireFox on Win2k and Xp.
Mega...
TullettJ (MoneyAM)
- 25 Apr 2006 07:41
- 46 of 72
Hello,
We're looking like we'll be going live with the new system this weekend. If more users would like to follow the instructions in the first post and use
http://test.moneyam.com as their primary site for the next few days it would aid our load testing.
Thanks,
J.
DocProc
- 25 Apr 2006 08:56
- 47 of 72
I'm not 100% thrilled about deleting ALL my cookies to try the new site.
Can you please advise which specific MoneyAM cookies are to be deleted and I will find them and then just delete those.
Mega Bucks
- 25 Apr 2006 08:59
- 48 of 72
J,i aint deleted no cookies yet,if aint broke i dont fix it,its working fine on 4 puters :-)
DocProc
- 25 Apr 2006 09:36
- 50 of 72
Couldn't find it, or anything resembling it. I searched drive c: for any file, including hidden files, for anything containing JSESSIONID. I did find one such file , but it wasn't anything to do with MoneyAM.
I do Spyware scans fairly regularly and usually delete any tracking cookies. Could it be I have already deleted it?
Anyhow, I made your new URL in your opening post my new Home Page and then went to it and logged in afresh. And I'm in and posting on the Trader's Thread.
DocProc
- 25 Apr 2006 09:42
- 51 of 72
I now seem to be able to access both the old site and the new test site.
My old and existing bookmarks seem to still work on the old site's URLs quite OK. All the URLs start with 'http://www.......'
The new site takes me to the new URLs via the test site's Home Page and it's button links. All the URLs start with 'http://test........'
Lostandfound
- 26 Apr 2006 17:14
- 58 of 72
TullettJ,
I've not tried the new site yet - lack of courage as I'm experimenting with Level 2! However, one thing that I think would improve the old site is how the 'Portfolios' appear to be treated. Once a portfolio is set up if I change a share by making a transaction all the history, i.e 1 day ago, 1 week ago etc., changes as well. Could this be corrected as it would allow portfolio value to be realistically tracked. The only information that needs to change is that of the day of the transaction.
Kind Regards
Steve
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 27 Apr 2006 07:42
- 59 of 72
Lostandfound,
I can't make any promises, but I will certainly pass onto the tech guys to see whether this is possible for future enhancement.
Ian
TullettJ (MoneyAM)
- 27 Apr 2006 07:45
- 60 of 72
Loadandfound,
Changes to how sections of the site work are beyond the scope of what testing this new architecture is for.
We've had major performance problems over the last few weeks with our current Java Application Server (JAS) so we're testing a different one as we believe it'll fix the situation.
It would suggest making your comment on the
bugs and enhancements thread which is where our developers take ideas for future projects.
J.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 27 Apr 2006 07:56
- 61 of 72
Fair point Mr Tullett.
But, lostandfound no need for you to post again as I have your comments now.
Cheers
Ian
Mega Bucks
- 27 Apr 2006 08:20
- 62 of 72
puters,still running OK,but have notice as i leave all my machines left on over night in the morning i have to log in again,is that the norm,apart from that is running fine !!!
Mega...
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 27 Apr 2006 08:23
- 63 of 72
Mega,
This would be normal, it is just the logon session expiring after a set time period.
Ian
DocProc
- 27 Apr 2006 12:12
- 64 of 72
Actually, IMHO, there does seem to be an absolutely mammoth amount of logging on required with this site.
Of course, my opinion could be wrong on this.
DocProc
- 27 Apr 2006 14:08
- 66 of 72
Just generally.
I think you have a log-in changeover time at about lunchtime, don't you. (ONE)
And then you might change something on the site outside the normal 9-5 period won't you? If so, this might well necessitate a new log-in requirement. (TWO)
And then some of my browser's Links are to 'www' will necessitate another log-in (THREE) whereas to access from 'test' might not. That is unless you alter things again and then it easily might (FOUR).
And then,before you know it, there's back to the log-in changeover time of day again. (FIVE?)
Sorta kinda.....well, it feels like, kinda sorta. :-)
DocProc
- 27 Apr 2006 16:01
- 68 of 72
OK :-)
And, just in case there are any users with login withdrawal symptoms....
porky
- 28 Apr 2006 09:34
- 69 of 72
Works fine with my Safari browser on the Applemac.
That`s more than I can say of your webcast feature, no luck with the Applemac again.
cheers.
DocProc
- 28 Apr 2006 15:12
- 70 of 72
Couldn't login again last evening. All I kept getting was a series of about 9-11 sound clicks and then a revert back to the login page. Gave up trying in the end.
Things seem perfectly OK today, though.