Kivver
- 16 Aug 2004 15:06
Recommended as a sell and maybe buy back in the autumn in Shares Magazine. Seems to be going up nicely on fairly large volumes ahead of interims on Wednesday (18.8.04). Does anybody know much about this company??
moneyplus
- 22 Oct 2004 10:23
- 101 of 245
Thanks Kivver for this, I am glad to read any update on IQE and any good points for holding. I need them to at least double to get my money back SueHelen's input useful but I think she is short term not long term like myself.
SueHelen
- 22 Oct 2004 17:04
- 102 of 245
Online bid price increased to 8.71 pence (hefty premium to the indicative bid of 8.25 pence) from 8.68 pence despite nearly all sells reported today. Very apparent that another very, very large buy is being filled in the background at 9.25 pence.
At close :
Buys = 10,000
Sells = 221,632.
thesaurus
- 22 Oct 2004 18:20
- 103 of 245
Dell what are your opinions on IQE short term? You seem to be knocking information and I would like to hear your opininon
johngrinsell
- 25 Oct 2004 10:26
- 104 of 245
johngrinsell
- 25 Oct 2004 10:39
- 105 of 245
This company has got joint funding from the government for research into nanotechnology,an estimated trillion dollar market within the next decade. perhaps this is were this company`s future lyes
SueHelen
- 25 Oct 2004 12:17
- 106 of 245
Another blatant treeshake on the bid price :
Online bid droped to 8.00 pence to discourage buying whilst the very large buy still gets filled in the background at 9.25 pence.
To back that assumption, online bid remains at 8.71 pence, a very heft premium of 0.71 pence to the indicative bid of 8.00 pence. The market makers are paying a very big premium for stock.
thesaurus
- 26 Oct 2004 14:48
- 107 of 245
anycomment sue helen
thesaurus
- 27 Oct 2004 15:31
- 108 of 245
sue helen make a comment
thesaurus
- 01 Nov 2004 14:34
- 109 of 245
well done sue helen
youve done it again
you ramp and then the stock tumbles and we hear nothing from you
thesaurus
- 01 Nov 2004 19:06
- 110 of 245
well done sue helen
youve done it again
you ramp and then the stock tumbles and we hear nothing from you
ptholden
- 01 Nov 2004 19:17
- 111 of 245
Pump and Dump guys. Sometimes she gets it right, sometimes wrong. I don't know what the ratio is, but personally I won't touch a stock that this poster casts comment / opinion on. One before this was WHOG. Fair play, she announced when she was out, but following further subsequnet rises to that declaration, this is also tumbling now.
Regards
PTH
Kivver
- 01 Nov 2004 23:13
- 112 of 245
I would not dismiss this share without doing any research. My opening statement says it all. It is recovering share, but how quick nobody knows. I would certainly keep an eye out for the next set of results. They have goverment funding for new nanoelectronic research. i have a small holding and i am investing medium to long term.
johngrinsell
- 02 Nov 2004 15:47
- 113 of 245
I agree. components are getting smaller all the time. may not happen overnight though!
thesaurus
- 03 Nov 2004 15:09
- 114 of 245
any reason for the handsome rise today
Kivver
- 03 Nov 2004 16:23
- 115 of 245
yes the company is recovering slowly, so will the shares imo.Also been a good day all round for the markets.
SueHelen
- 03 Nov 2004 20:07
- 116 of 245
Up 6.06% at 8.50-9.00 pence...nice 117K buy came through at 8.50 pence.
1.5 Million X trade at 8.75 pence today
660,000 X trade at 8.75 pence today
Something going on behind the scenes here - someone repositioning themselves for some action to come?
Trading statement should be coming soon...either this week of definetely next week.
john50
- 04 Nov 2004 10:18
- 117 of 245
Going like a train now up 30%
Kivver
- 04 Nov 2004 10:24
- 118 of 245
Well done suehelen and all others who kept the faith. Do we sell now for or hold on. Im holding on, the prediction is next year will bring better dollar therefore improving the results iqe.
john50
- 04 Nov 2004 10:33
- 119 of 245
Kiver i'am holding to 30p, i have already been in from 3 to 18p last year.
goal
- 04 Nov 2004 10:42
- 120 of 245
http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200411041003028494E.html