Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

mnamreh - 15 Dec 2010 11:42 - 10344 of 81564

.

Fred1new - 15 Dec 2010 15:00 - 10345 of 81564

A long time ago.

My father told me, that I was entitled to my own opinion.

He added that, if I gave an opinion, I should be prepared to defend it.

He also added that, it was only a fool who never changed his opinion.

He also told me, that if I sign an letter or form, the signature was representative of me and to accept the responsibility of not signing anything lightly.


If you write anything on a subject, which may effect the public in general, I think public are entitled to know.

As far as Wikileaks and Pllger, is concerned, it is interesting to see how many major decisions of political leaders were based on flimsy information, whim or ideology.

Often leading to colossal loss of the lives of others.

Exposure, may be of benefit to the majority of society, but I can see why the "elite" may be obstructive and prefer to remain and act unobserved.


aldwickk - 15 Dec 2010 17:24 - 10346 of 81564

of not to signing

if I sign an letter or form,


What school did Fred go to ?

hilary - 15 Dec 2010 17:27 - 10347 of 81564

Approved?

Stan - 15 Dec 2010 17:36 - 10348 of 81564

And when are you two going to start?

Fred1new - 15 Dec 2010 17:54 - 10349 of 81564

H. and Alds,

It was also suggested to me, to look at the content of a parcel and not the wrappings.

I wonder what my valuation of either of you would be.

But thank you for pointing out my errors.




Fred1new - 15 Dec 2010 18:28 - 10350 of 81564

I have concluded that my valuations would be, glossy on the outsides and rubbish on the insides.

MightyMicro - 15 Dec 2010 21:24 - 10351 of 81564

Fred exuding his usual charm.

Stan - 15 Dec 2010 21:31 - 10352 of 81564

Followed by MM exuding.

MightyMicro - 15 Dec 2010 23:41 - 10353 of 81564

Well, Hil, it seems that Fred hasn't squelched you after all. Lucky you!

aldwickk - 16 Dec 2010 00:17 - 10354 of 81564

Micro

Did you get my email i resent ?

aldwickk - 16 Dec 2010 00:24 - 10355 of 81564

on the insides. I think that should be "On the inside "

MightyMicro - 16 Dec 2010 19:36 - 10356 of 81564

aldwickk: my apologies, yes I did. I'll reply shortly.

Fred1new - 16 Dec 2010 20:26 - 10357 of 81564

Did the Mighty mouse leave some droppings?

aldwickk - 16 Dec 2010 22:03 - 10358 of 81564

?

MightyMicro - 17 Dec 2010 01:57 - 10359 of 81564

aldwickk: response sent by email. And no, I've no idea what Fred is on about.

aldwickk - 17 Dec 2010 09:59 - 10360 of 81564

Just sent a reply with Mike's website address.

aldwickk - 17 Dec 2010 10:01 - 10361 of 81564

http://www.themightyquinn.co.uk/

ExecLine - 19 Dec 2010 13:10 - 10362 of 81564

To a reasonable extent, I do like some of our British traditions.

Because of that, I can't say I'm happy to read the following:

Off with her head: Rushed through legislation will let foreign owner of privatised Royal Mail remove Queen's head from stamps

More HERE

This_is_me - 19 Dec 2010 17:18 - 10363 of 81564

Remember the guy who got on a plane with a bomb built into his shoe and tried to light it?

Did you know his trial is over?
Did you know he was sentenced?
Did you see/hear any of the judge's comments on TV or Radio?

Didn't think so.!!!

Everyone should hear & read what the judge had to say at the time of sentencing.

Ruling by Judge William Young, US District Court.

Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had anything to say. His response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the record, Reid also admitted his 'allegiance to Osama bin Laden, to Islam, and to the religion of Allah,' defiantly stating, 'I think I will not apologize for my actions,' and told the court 'I am at war with your country.'

Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below:

January 30, 2003, United States vs. Reid.

Judge Young: 'Mr. Richard C. Reid, hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you.

On counts 1, 5 and 6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody of the United States Attorney General. On counts 2, 3, 4and 7, the Court sentences you to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each count to run consecutively. (That's 80 years.)

On count 8 the Court sentences you to the mandatory 30 years again, to be served consecutively to the 80 years just imposed. The Court imposes upon you for each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 that's an aggregate fine of $2 million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation with respect to restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17 to Andre Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines.

The Court imposes upon you an $800 special assessment. The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release simply because the law requires it. But the life sentences are real life sentences so I need go no further.

This is the sentence that is provided for by our statutes. It is a fair and just sentence. It is a righteous sentence.

Now, let me explain this to you. We are not afraid of you or any of your terrorist co-conspirators, Mr. Reid. We are Americans. We have been through the fire before. There is too much war talk here and I say that to everyone with the utmost respect. Here in this court, we deal with individuals as individuals and care for individuals as individuals. As human beings, we reach out for justice.

You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. You are not a soldier in any war. You are a terrorist. To give you that reference, to call you a soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether the officers of government do it or your attorney does it, or if you think you are a soldier, you are not----- you are a terrorist. And we do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not meet with terrorists. We do not sign documents with terrorists. We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice.

So war talk is way out of line in this court. You are a big fellow. But you are not that big. You're no warrior. I've known warriors. You are a terrorist. A species of criminal that is guilty of multiple attempted murders. In a very real sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when you first were taken off that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press and the TV crews were, and he said: 'You're no big deal.'

You are no big deal.

What your able counsel and what the equally able United States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as honestly as I know how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so horrific. What was it that led you here to this courtroom today?

I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I ask you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable hate led you to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing? And, I have an answer for you. It may not satisfy you, but as I search this entire record, it comes as close to understanding as I know.

It seems to me you hate the one thing that to us is most precious. You hate our freedom. Our individual freedom. Our individual freedom to live as we choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not believe as we individually choose. Here, in this society, the very wind carries freedom. It carries it everywhere from sea to shining sea. It is because we prize individual freedom so much that you are here in this beautiful courtroom, so that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is administered fairly, individually, and discretely. It is for freedom's sake that your lawyers are striving so vigorously on your behalf, have filed appeals, will go on in their representation of you before other judges.

We Americans are all about freedom. Because we all know that the way we treat you, Mr. Reid, is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake though. It is yet true that we will bear any burden; pay any price, to preserve our freedoms. Look around this courtroom. Mark it well. The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. The day after tomorrow, it will be forgotten, but this, however, will long endure.

Here in this courtroom and courtrooms all across America , the American people will gather to see that justice, individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is in fact being done. The very President of the United States through his officers will have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and judge that evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our sense of justice.

See that flag, Mr. Reid? That's the flag of the United States of America . That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten. That flag stands for freedom. And it always will.

Mr. Custody Officer. Stand him down
Register now or login to post to this thread.