goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
skinny
- 24 May 2011 11:04
- 10937 of 81564
So George Davis
was innocent.
George Davis wins appeal against robbery conviction.
A man who continually denied his involvement in an armed robbery in the 1970s has won an appeal against his conviction.
George Davis was jailed for 20 years for armed robbery and wounding, after a raid in April 1974 at the then London Electricity Board, in Essex.
skinny
- 25 May 2011 08:02
- 10938 of 81564
Denmark bans sale of yeasty Marmite spread
Denmark has banned the savoury spread Marmite, saying its added vitamins and minerals break food safety laws.
Lets hope it doesn't spread!
ExecLine
- 25 May 2011 10:02
- 10939 of 81564
The following article got me tick, tick, whirr, whirring:
http://www.thesun.co.uk: Steven-Howard says Ryan Giggs will have just one thing on his mind on Saturday night
Quote: "....footballers live in a bubble, protected from the real world by their clubs, team-mates and a host of lawyers,agents, minders and friends. That is how Giggs, barely changing stride, has been able to get on with his life."
Anyone else out there beginning to wonder if the primary legal advisers to Ryan Giggs are actually Manchester United's legal team and Sir Alex Ferguson and not a lawyer privately and separately appointed by Giggs outside of the club?
greekman
- 25 May 2011 10:37
- 10940 of 81564
Sooner this Giggs saga is over the better!
Is there anyone else out there who is not bothered how he behaves off the pitch as long as it is not criminal or seriously morally wrong.
He had an affair! So what!
It is thought that over half of all married couples have affairs, during their marriage.
His big mistake was the injunction. Surely those close to him knew about the affair, so if he had allowed the media to publish without this circus, he could have made the usual statement along the lines of 'this is a private matter and I will not discus this further'. Within a few days, the furore would have died down leaving nothing for the press to publish and nothing for people to talk about.
Personally, I find the subject very boring.
Note........Not having a go at anyone on here, as I am now one of those joining in on the discussion, although my post is more of a statement, as I have no desire to discus said subject.
This_is_me
- 25 May 2011 13:42
- 10941 of 81564
Having sexual intercourse outside marriage is seriously morally wrong. Unfortunately his behaviour is not much different from a large number of those writing about it or many members of the public at large.
greekman
- 25 May 2011 14:24
- 10942 of 81564
This is me,
I agree that unfortunately the attitude toward such behavior is not what it used to be.
Most people who are famous, wealthy or both, have far more temptations put in their way than us ordinary folk.
I am not trying to excuse their behavior, but I must admit to seeing many pictures of beautiful women (it's never the ugly ones) who have been named in extra marital affairs, and being honest enough to admit to myself, that in the past I would have found it 'very difficult' to say no should the opportunity be presented to me on a plate (yes strange place to have sex).
I remember a few years ago when an absolutely 100% gorgeous 20 year old female teacher was found guilty of having sex with a 15 year old schoolboy. I remember thinking, lucky devil, it never happened to me.
I appreciate that if it had been a male teacher and a female pupil I would have thought differently, and that makes me a hypocrite. Something I think most men are when regarding sex.
I am very happily married, but as a hot blooded male, I am being perfectly honest.
ExecLine
- 25 May 2011 15:51
- 10943 of 81564
Greek
You say, 'His big mistake was the injunction'
I do think all of revelations that have now come out have marred Gigg's career.
The good stuff:
Giggs as a professional footballer, has been at the top of his game longer than anyone. An incredible 20 seasons in which he has won 12 titles, four FA Cups, three League Cups and two Champions League trophies.
At the same time, he has broken every appearance record at Old Trafford - 613 in the league and 875 overall.
He is also the only player to have scored in every Premier League season.
And he has never been sent off in a United shirt.
The bad stuff:
All the revelations about his affair within Imogen Thomas convey a very negative picture about Giggs as a husband and a father. And there are also other women now being mentioned once again, where all of the information on that with them had gone quiet.
What I am actually trying to say is this:
It is Manchester United's lawyers that have messed up by giving Giggs what has turned out to be very bad advice. Their client, Giggs, accepted the advice, instructed them to 'go ahead then and take out the super injunction'.
He is a footballer, not a lawyer. He listens to the advice of the lawyers, makes a footballer's decision and then does what they advise. Wrong!! He wasn't qualified to know what was best to do - take the advice or leave it.
These lawyers are most probably not Gigg's lawyers. They highly likely to be Manchester United Football Club's lawyers.
If Giggs can be said to have got it wrong - then so can the club be said to have got it wrong too.
Hence why Sir Alex Ferguson is so angry with the situation. He has to be both angry and frustrated by Giggs but surely more angry with the advice given to Giggs by the MUFC's lawyers.
...................
I do think you have to be admiring of Ferguson in all of this. He can and does keep the team together as such a very powerful unit and no matter what is thrown at it!
But stand by for the club firing their team of legal advisers for sure!
greekman
- 25 May 2011 16:19
- 10944 of 81564
When I said it was Giggs mistake, I do agree it was down to advice given, but the fact is he made the final decision.
It would probably have been better to say the advice given was wrong, as i am sure he was under great pressure from others.
As to his football career. I don't think it will be blighted in the long term, as this will fizzle out quickly.
I have aways admired, Giggsy as a great ambassador for United and football in general. These revaluations make no difference to how I will view him, and I am sure that goes for most football fans.
I appreciate it has not been good for his marriage and fatherhood, but I look at things like that philosophically.
My old career is still known for having more marriage breakdowns than any other, most being down to extra marital relationships.
Most such relationships are of no interest whatsoever to others.
What Giggs and other famous people do regarding sex outside marriage is also of no interest to me.
As to Ferguson. Great manager that he is, I just can't stand the man.
beebusy
- 26 May 2011 08:03
- 10945 of 81564
anybody have Imogens phone number??
Stan
- 26 May 2011 08:09
- 10946 of 81564
No.. but someone here might know: +44 (0) 161 868 8000 hospitality@manutd.co.uk
greekman
- 26 May 2011 08:22
- 10947 of 81564
Beebusy,
If your interested, there is an Imogen who has her number on a card in our local phone box.
beebusy
- 26 May 2011 08:30
- 10948 of 81564
Going on the basis that anything that gets you into, and keeps you in the news in her line is a good thing , I would say Giggs did her a favour.
greekman
- 26 May 2011 08:42
- 10949 of 81564
Well he certainly, 'Did her'.
ExecLine
- 26 May 2011 17:44
- 10950 of 81564
After checking up on it, I found out that Alonso seems to be leading the way in practice at Monaco.
I found this picture of some seating. Nice view or wot?
By the way, I mean 'from the stands'.
(Should one be so fortunate as to own one, a bit of patience is obviously required in removing one's boat from it's mooring after the event, eh?)
aldwickk
- 26 May 2011 19:33
- 10951 of 81564
To be serious for a moment has anybody tried a Dyson hand dryer ? I used one for the first time in the Gent's at the Churchill square shopping mall, Brighton, its like a upside down toaster that you put your two hands in, its much better then any other i have tried, it must be about 5 five times quicker.
This_is_me
- 27 May 2011 00:43
- 10952 of 81564
Senior health care solution -
So you're a sick senior citizen and the government says there is no nursing home available for you and if there was they would take all your money and your house to pay for it - what do you do?
Our plan gives anyone 65 years or older a gun and 4 bullets. You are allowed to shoot 2 MP's and 2 illegal immigrants!
Of course, this means you will be sent to prison where you will get 3 meals a day, a roof over your head, central heating, air conditioning and all the health care you need! New teeth - no problem. Need glasses, great. New hip, knees, kidney, lungs, heart? All covered. (And your kids can come and visit you as often as they do now). You will not have to pay a penny and so can leave everything to your children or whoever you like ( or spend it all in advance)
And who will be paying for all of this? The same government that just told you that they cannot afford for you to go into a home.
IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?
greekman
- 27 May 2011 07:16
- 10954 of 81564
Execline,
I once had a boat in Monaco Harbor and I never found any problem with overcrowding.
All I had to do was let the air out, fold it up then carry it to an open space, blow it up again and that was that.
This-is-me,
Don't forget that life in prison is not quite that good due to the overcrowding.
Now if we shot 'all' the illegal immigrants, not forgetting those MPs now in prison we could all at least have a cell each as the prison population would drop by at least 50%.
Of course if you are a sick over 65 year old illegal immigrant, you have the best of both worlds. All that free care you mentioned, and if you shot, stabbed or just kicked someone to death you would on release be kept in the manner of free housing, and child benefit payments for your dozen or so kids and of course your own at least one personal security person watching you day and night, making sure no one attacked you or your property. Of course to receive all that, on release you would have to claim political asylum quoting the Human rights Act.
What an upside down world we live in.
beebusy
- 27 May 2011 08:11
- 10955 of 81564
I dont plan to retire as the pension I have worked all my life to accrue is worth damn all as some robbing Ba--ard has spent it for me and the goverment will take the rest in tax to keep the ILL IMS to a standard to which they are unaccustomed!!! Bitter me?? Naww!!!
aldwickk
- 27 May 2011 08:23
- 10956 of 81564
You can fool some of the people most of the time etc ,ect ,
Labour has opened up a seven-point lead as support for the Conservatives has fallen dramatically over the past month, according to a poll.
The number of voters intending to back Labour has risen by two points to 42% while those planning to support the Tories has fallen five points to 35%, the Reuters/Ipsos Mori survey found.
The Tories' Liberal Democrat coalition partners saw their support creep up a single point to 10% - still significantly down on their pre-government ratings.