From:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/epic/tsco/11171562/Tesco-suspends-three-more-executives.html
Tesco staff 'misled auditors’ over black hole
Source reveals the practices that led to Tesco's £250m accounting shortfall
By Graham Ruddick7:15PM BST 18 Oct 2014
Comments: 19 Comments
The investigation into the £250m accounting scandal at Tesco is understood to have uncovered evidence that a “small group” of people within Britain’s biggest retailer deliberately misled its auditors and accountants to flatter its financial results.
A senior source close to the investigation said the practices had been going on for “more than a year” on a smaller scale, but ramped up in the last six months as the pressure on Tesco sales increased.
Tesco will, on Thursday, provide the first details into the £250m accounting scandal that has rocked Britain’s biggest private employer.
The Telegraph understands the scandal involves Tesco booking supplier contributions that were conditional on hitting sales targets that it was not going to reach.
It is understood that a “small group” of employees, realising these sales targets would not be hit, struck deals with suppliers to still make these payments by offering benefits in the next financial period. These benefits were kept secret and in the worst-case scenario involved Tesco actually paying money back to the supplier in the next period.
The source said the situation at Tesco was “very serious” and was “not an accounting issue” but the result of “inappropriate behaviour”. The source added: “There was a deliberate intention not to be upfront with the auditors.”
The revelation that the practice has been going on for more than six months will concern Tesco investors, who have already seen the value of the company fall by almost half in 2014. However, they will be relieved if the evidence suggests there was not a widespread issue within the culture of the company.
Sources within Tesco have confirmed there was concern among the company’s finance team and auditors for some time over its commercial income, because it was remaining flat while sales were falling.
PwC, Tesco’s auditors, took a detailed look at the retailer’s commercial income earlier this year and warned there was a “risk of manipulation”. However, on the basis of the information available, Tesco’s accounts were given a clean bill of health.
The issue with Tesco’s commercial income was revealed to Dave Lewis, the new chief executive, by a whistleblower in the company’s finance department. This prompted Mr Lewis to alert investors and bring in Deloitte and Freshfields to lead an investigation. Eight executives, including UK boss Chris Bush, have been suspended.
The early findings of this inquiry will form part of Tesco’s interim results this week. The investigation is still ongoing, but Mr Lewis said in a memo to staff that Tesco will provide a “clear and accurate indication of our income for the first half of the year”.
The evidence uncovered by Deloitte and Freshfields is likely to provide grounds for the City regulators, the Financial Conduct Authority and the Financial Reporting Council, to press ahead with their investigations into Tesco.
Shares in Tesco are down by 48pc year-to-date, and last week it emerged that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, one of the company’s biggest shareholders, is selling down its stake.
Following the discovery of the £250m blackhole, Tesco is expected to report trading of roughly £850m for the six months to the end of August, almost half the £1.6bn reported in the same period last year.
This will be the first set of financial results to be presented by Mr Lewis, who replaced Philip Clarke as chief executive on September 1. However, the former Unilever executive is not expected to reveal a strategic overhaul of Tesco. Instead, he only intends to inform the market after changes – such as a cut in prices – have been made.
There has been speculation in the City that Mr Lewis could announce a rights issue or asset sales – such as the disposal of Tesco’s business in South Korea – to shore up the balance sheet. However, this is unlikely.
Tesco declined to comment.
Here are the Comments thus far - and "very interesting too" are some of them:
Avatar
Reboon • 23 minutes ago
Through chance, I've noticed something which must be costing Tesco a fortune. It's something which benefits the observant customer. I wonder how many other people have noticed it.
What I have noticed must certainly be a factor in money "vanishing" in an undetermined way. Maybe they think staff are stealing. I don't even want to give a clue in case Tesco realise. I can only assume they haven't realised as it surely wouldn't be possible if they knew :-D
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Graham • 28 minutes ago
PWC identified a “risk of manipulation” but didn't fully investigate that risk, sufficient to satisfy themselves that nothing was wrong? If they did properly investigate then why did they find nothing; if they didn't properly investigate then they are guilty of professional misconduct. So, it is either an inadequate investigation or an inadequate investigation. Guilty as charged, m'lud.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
beatonthedonis • 39 minutes ago
If they can lie to a big-four accounting firm and their investors over £250m, imagine what they could do when it comes to what you put in your mouth.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
bill40 • an hour ago
Jolly good the "a few rotten apples defence". A report by Citibank in 2010 had already drawn attention to the systematic corruption that we now know exists. So four years documented and many more to come I don't doubt.
Anyone falling for this guff deserves shooting.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Tsavor • an hour ago
Power corrupts and Tesco and it's employees have for years believed they have had absolute power over their suppliers. Stories of MD's of suppliers providing the goods and doing the cooking at category buyers annual barbecues, might just be urban myths or then they could be true.
I've seen with my own eyes letters and invoices from Tesco demanding payment just for the privilege of doing business with them, and I've been out of the food industry for 10 years, so nothing new here.
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Mary1958 Tsavor • 18 minutes ago
I think the practise of "seller contributions" is more shocking than Tesco fiddling the books.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
taguntumi Tsavor • an hour ago
Amen.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Jeff Kaye • an hour ago
There is a cultural problem at Tesco that needs to be solved - not just accounting and not just a few people - why were those "few people" so focused on doing wrong? It has been a corrupting culture. http://jeffkaye.wordpress.com/... ????
3 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
NeedaSpliff • 2 hours ago
Jail the Tesco managers and the Partner responsible for the "independent" audit..
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Alan Llandrindod Wells NeedaSpliff • an hour ago
What about the directors?
It happened in their companies on their watch.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
NeedaSpliff Alan Llandrindod Wells • an hour ago
Agree
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
theresap • 2 hours ago
This article has been placed to deflect attention from the auditors who knew exactly what was going on but it was a good fee
5 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
davidraynes • 2 hours ago
If a small group inside the Company deliberately conspired to rig the figures (and thus the share price) and this action deceived the public and created a false market (which the insiders were able to understand and take advantage of), that looks like fraud.
It looks very much as if some collars need to be felt and Inspector Knacker needs to get moving.
How many more knew?
The auditors have not done well either. same old thing one suspects, the business is their master and paying their bill,
4 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Alan Llandrindod Wells davidraynes • an hour ago
Think of the auditors that did the bust, price fixing, money laundering, sanctions busting, fraudulent banks.
Then think big 4. They never noticed?
Nuff said.
All the stores directors will claim that they did not know what was happening in their company, on their watch.
The Establishment will close ranks, and some clerk will end up in court.
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
MCFC1894 • 2 hours ago
Every fiddle helps!
9 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Guest • 2 hours ago
"Of course the auditors will conclude that Tesco misled the auditors."
Agree. Auditors don't look hard enough, usually the person actually doing the audit is 22 and straight out of university.
Having worked for major suppliers to Tesco, it was not an uncommon occurrence to get mugged at their year end, with promises of better shelving or better promotional slots next year. The amounts were rather large and we weren't their biggest suppliers.
Paying out on a over rider when they didn't reach their targets, yeah seen that many times.
It's been happening for years, the fact that they claim it is just the last six months makes me laugh. All that's happened is that they are finding it increasingly hard to deliver on promises to suppliers in the following years.
One of my fondest/happy memories was kicking Sommerfield as they went down... a reward for the pleasure of working with them post acquisition (the up they forecast).
5 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Shaun Power • 2 hours ago
There is a very fine line between illegality and what became, over time, typical Tesco practice. That line, was, is (possibly), wafer thin. Quite frankly they throughly deserve the kicking they're currently getting.
We worked for them as a supplier for 25 years...and incrementally it became worse and worse until we'd had enough and when we finally could no longer meet their 'terms' they fired us. What a relief.
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
10 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Moneycircus • 3 hours ago
Of course the auditors will conclude that Tesco misled the auditors.
Having blamed Tesco, it is mutually convenient that the auditors should assure us this involved just a "few bad apples" on Tesco's shelves.
The auditors' evidence appears to confirm what several observers have suggested - that the statements were distorted by deals with suppliers.
Since Tesco's M.O. is to screw suppliers into the ground, we may suspect that the real misinformation here does not relate to promising "benefits" to suppliers.
Rather some more complex misdemeanor is likely to have been involved given that the methods Tesco uses with its suppliers are, exactly, complex.
I'd like others to help me with information but with wine it goes something like this:
You, Mr Winery, have a good reputation for your wine and we'd like to list you. But your wine is too expensive. We'd like you to make a cheaper version for Tesco. Of course you and we shall brand it as the regular product.
You commit to producing a certain number (in the 100,000 of cases) at this price point and we'll take it.
Now that's just the beginning. What money changes hands, and in what direction, is another question.
8 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
WetThrust Moneycircus • an hour ago
This is certainly true. I bought a bottle of Valpolicella Amarone the other day from a major chain that had a very cheap cork on what was a £20 bottle of wine. I contacted the supplier as I thought it was counterfeit. But it turned out it was a special run. As you say, a cheaper product trading on the reputation of the regular product. I wonder who got to pocket the excess profit on what was really only a £7 bottle at best. UK supermarkets have a corrupt culture that would not be unrecognised in Africa.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Alan Llandrindod Wells Moneycircus • 2 hours ago
All the big retailers use their oligopoly power to play this game. And worse.
I like your use of the term "benefits" sarcastically.
Wait for revelations at them all, including the so-called ethical ones.
They issue long questionaires saying suppliers must adhere to ethical guidelines then purchase regardless of ethics.
The Chinese use state employees to fill these forms in and wet themselves laughing.
Confiscation of so-called "marketing" or "promotion" money, which the supplier then has to try and retrieve ,if he has the guts, are standard. These can be steep when extra profit is required by the retailer to flatter the accounts and build "so-called" profits.
2 • Reply•Share ›