There is a really good tech team here, lets give them some ideas for enhancements or to cure any bugs we find.

Kayak,

Go on then....show me the money! (costs)

MaxK, MoneyAM hid it very well, but it's here: http://www.moneyam.com/sub.php

Kayak
I thought 'oh baby' was an unusual term of endearment from you.

Haystack: I would imagine that such an expostulation from Kayak would have been in Italian.

MM

Mamma mia!

Haystack: Told you so.

MM

PS: Kayak -- Mamma mia is hardly a faithful translation of "oh baby", is it? I expected something more, er, erotic and, well, Italian.

It doesn't translate well :-)

Ah, I understand.

MM

There is an RNS Reach announcement by NXT (NTX) this morning, but there is no "N" flag showing against the company.

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/rns/announcement.asp?AnnID=560545

Is it possible for you to include RNS Reach in your news feed, please...??



T22

Can someone please clarify the situation for me vis a vis subscription levels and bulletin boards? As a Shares mag subscriber, it seems I get the 55 per yr subscription level for free (whatever it's called). This seems to allow me access to both the traders room and the investors room, but my only attempt to post on a thread in the traders room resulted in nothing happening - ie my post did not appear. Am I correct in thinking that I can access both rooms but only post in this one? If this post doesn't appear, I shall begin to feel persecuted......

Scallywag,

As a Shares magazine subscriber you should be able to post on both boards...

Can you try again on the Traders' Room?

Thanks,

J.

Thanks TullettJ - it seems you're right, I can post on both. I don't know what happened to earlier post to the traders room - it just sunk without trace :-)

Just added Momentum indicator to charts.
Comments welcome
F

Jon, just to report that occasionally when clicking on a thread from the thread index I get the login screen, even though in fact I was still logged in. I know that I was still logged in since if I go "Back" to the thread index and refresh it still shows me logged in. On clicking on a thread again it does not happen again.

Am I the only one who finds it irritating to have to scroll to the bottom to read the latest message? Wouldn't it make more sense for the most recent to be the first ....
or have I missed something?

hedge-hog:

Well, I guess it depends on what you're used to. The current format is regarded as "conventional" by most of the users who are here, although we did briefly experiment with a reversed order such as you suggest (last post at top of page). Most bulletin boards - in my experience - use this format.

Derek (IST and MoneyAM)

I think that reading down is also a western habit as is reading from left to right. This of course strangely doesn't apply to the threads lists where the latest is at the top. It's a strange world.

Kayak,

But on the login screen, does it say 'you are not currently logged in'?

J.

Jon, I can't totally confirm that until it happens again, but I know that if I just press backspace rather than logging in again, I am still logged in. I think that this is a different problem from the random logout problem.

Yes. That's what I have found. To make it clearer I have an interesting example. The logon screen comes up effectively telling me to log on again. However, if I have another window open for say the threads list on the Traders room then I can read one of the posts there and it shows I am logged on. I just close the logon window down and carry on and open new windows again. I thibnk that the logon screen is spurious and that I have not been logged off at all.