| Home | Log In | Register | Our Services | My Account | Contact | Help |
- 13 May 2003 21:42
- 27 May 2009 10:09
- 125 of 257
- 27 May 2009 12:30
- 126 of 257
- 29 May 2009 13:23
- 127 of 257
- 29 May 2009 17:48
- 128 of 257
- 01 Jun 2009 15:07
- 129 of 257
- 01 Jun 2009 15:30
- 130 of 257
- 02 Jun 2009 11:13
- 131 of 257
- 02 Jul 2009 11:34
- 132 of 257
- 03 Jul 2009 09:11
- 133 of 257
- 10 Jul 2009 15:24
- 134 of 257
- 10 Jul 2009 21:44
- 135 of 257
- 16 Jul 2009 17:40
- 136 of 257
- 18 Sep 2009 08:35
- 137 of 257
- 18 Sep 2009 21:30
- 138 of 257
- 22 Oct 2009 15:48
- 139 of 257
- 07 Dec 2009 15:18
- 140 of 257
- 21 Jun 2010 11:02
- 142 of 257
Published Date: 04 July 2010 -- By Martin Flanagan -- City Editor
PHOTO-ME, the photo booth maker fined 500,000 earlier this month by the Financial Services Authority for making misleading statements to the market, will continue its bridge-building efforts with the City this week with an expected hike in annual profits.
The company, which at one time became known for its serial profits warnings, incurred the "largest fine of its type" on 21 June for retaining vital trading information that led to what the regulator called "a false market in Photo-Me's shares for 44
The FSA said the firm had information in January and February 2007 that it was no longer in exclusive discussions for a contract for its "minilab" processing equipment and that minilab sales were below expectations. But Photo-Me did not issue a profit warning until 2 March that year.
However, Photo-Me is expected to show a continued trading resurgence when it reports annual results this Wednesday, having said in an update earlier this month that it expected full-year underlying pre-tax profit to be "at least" 20 per cent ahead of market expectations.
Broker Hardman & Co said that following this guidance it had upgraded its profit forecast to 12.9m from 10.5m on sales of 226.8m, with a dividend payment of 0.5p restored. There was no shareholder payout the previous year when Photo-Me made a profit of 1.6m on sales of 210.5m. Analyst Roger Hardman said in a recent note that he expected an improved performance from KIS, the company's sales and servicing division, "where there has been a great effort at cost reduction".
The note said that the company had probably benefited from the "successful re-siting of photo booths and other machines into higher throughput locations. In particular, Photo-Me suffered at the end of the previous year from the failure of Woolworths in the UK".
Hardman said the group would also have benefited in the year to end-April from more beneficial exchange rates between sterling and the euro, with 48 per cent of the company's revenues in 2009 coming from Europe.
Photo-Me said after the regulatory ruling that it was disappointed with the size of the fine and that the FSA had underestimated the difficulties the company faced in updating the market on the possible outcome of the contract negotiations. It said it would not appeal as it was "not in the best interests of shareholders to incur further legal costs"