goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 20 Oct 2011 18:35
- 12726 of 81564
I am not religious and I am not bothered how Gadaffi died. They can parade his body through the streets dragged behind a car as far as I am concerned. No punishment is too great for him. When you die that's it and nothing more. The only thing that matters is that hopefully Gadaffi might have suffered before he died.
skinny
- 20 Oct 2011 18:39
- 12727 of 81564
I think SC means the bitch with the sun glasses.
Haystack
- 20 Oct 2011 20:10
- 12728 of 81564
Let's hope the woman with the cross does offends a few christians. In the past we all had a lot more to worry about. Many families lost children in infancy and mothers died as well. My own father lost both his siblings leaving him an only child. His mother died giving birth the the last one. That was only in 1926 when he was 10. Now we are supposed to care if people get offended. Being offended is not exactly the worst thing that can happen to you. In the scheme of things it is pretty insignificant and not worthy of note.
If people believe in religion and other such fairy stories then they should get offended. It should be the duty of non believers to offend them. Religion causes so much trouble and misery in the world. It shouldn't be banned, but held up to ridicule. As for the government giving special status to religiious schools in the way of charitable status and grants, that it even worse as it perpetuates the whole nonsense.
ptholden
- 20 Oct 2011 21:02
- 12729 of 81564
And that attitude is pretty much how wars start.
Haystack
- 20 Oct 2011 21:27
- 12730 of 81564
No. It is the attitude that religion is important that start wars. If people thought religion was just silly then we could all just ignore it.
If you poke fun at the Islamic religion in a major way then you may well end up dead. However, it must not be forgotten that was also the case regarding the christian religion in days past.
If we all ignored religion, did not allow special status for religion in schools, churches etc then its influence should diminish. I am happy for people to practice religion in private, but I would prefer if it was treated as a personal habit with no official status.
I can do without various archbisops giving advice. If the leader of a group of people who believed the earth was flat made pronouncements about life we would find it amusing. In fact we would be surprised if anyone took the advice seriously.
ptholden
- 20 Oct 2011 21:47
- 12731 of 81564
Whilst I tend to agree with some of your sentiment, we are where we are with religion and it isn't going to change anytime soon; so on the whole, probably better to have a bit of tolerance.
aldwickk
- 20 Oct 2011 22:37
- 12732 of 81564
It is the attitude that religion is important that start wars.
Haystack
People fight over land , water , food and oil to name a few , so you won't stop many war's from starting.
dreamcatcher
- 20 Oct 2011 22:43
- 12733 of 81564
Greece 'Paralysed' As General Strike Bites.Give them a bail out which we cannot afford
and they go on strike. Get back to work you lazy b's. Why bother.
goldfinger
- 21 Oct 2011 08:24
- 12736 of 81564
Looks like we caught ourselves another one. Come on Goldfish gob, come clean. Strange how this money is declared when the HEAT IS ON...........
City financiers fund Michael Gove's private office 33 minutes ago via
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/8840033/City-financiers-fund-Michael-Goves-private-office.html
skinny
- 21 Oct 2011 08:27
- 12737 of 81564
skinny
- 21 Oct 2011 08:29
- 12738 of 81564
goldfinger - that should please xstrata shareholders (not).
goldfinger
- 21 Oct 2011 08:45
- 12739 of 81564
Lets hope hes caught like the Fox. Skinny.
Guilty as sin from his actions. I think John Mann the labour bruiser knows of a few more aswel. He keeps mentioning 4 or 5 in the cabinet.
The heats on for call me dave.
aldwickk
- 21 Oct 2011 09:44
- 12740 of 81564
Don't tell Fred , he will be posting one of his long rant's
skinny
- 21 Oct 2011 09:54
- 12741 of 81564
> ENGLAND EXPECTS EVERYMAN THIS
> DAY TO DO HIS DUTY
>
> If Trafalgar was fought today.....................................
>
> Nelson at Trafalgar-------------------
>
> Nelson: "Order the signal, Hardy."
> Hardy: "Aye, Aye, sir."
>
> Nelson: "Hold on, that's not what I dictated to the Signals Officer.
> What`s the meaning of this?"
> Hardy: "Sorry sir?"
>
> Nelson: (reading aloud): "England expects every person to do his duty,
> regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious persuasion or
> disability. What gobbledygook is this?"
> Hardy: "Admiralty policy, I'm afraid, sir. We`re an equal opportunities
> employer now. We had the devil's own job getting "England" past the
> censors, lest it be considered racist."
>
> Nelson: "Gadzooks, Hardy. Hand me my pipe and tobacco."
> Hardy: "Sorry sir. All naval vessels have been designated smoke-free
> working environments."
>
> Nelson: "In that case, break open the rum ration. Let us splice the
> mainbrace to steel the men before battle."
> Hardy: "The rum ration has been abolished, Admiral. It`s part of the
> Government`s policy on binge drinking."
>
> Nelson: "Good heavens, Hardy. I suppose we`d better get on with it. Full
> speed ahead."
> Hardy: "I think you'll find there's a 4 knot speed limit in this stretch
> of water."
>
> Nelson: "Damn it man! We are on the eve of the greatest sea battle in
> history. We must advance with all dispatch. Report from the crow's nest
> please."
> Hardy: "That won't be possible, sir."
>
> Nelson: "What?"
> Hardy: "Health and safety have closed the crow's nest, sir. No harness.
> And they said that rope ladder doesn't meet regulations. They won't let
> anyone up there until a proper scaffolding can be erected."
>
> Nelson: "Then get the ship's carpenter without delay, Hardy."
> Hardy:"He's busy knocking up a wheelchair access to the fo'c'sle,
> Admiral."
>
> Nelson: "Wheelchair access? I`ve never heard anything so absurd."
> Hardy: "Health and safety again, sir. We have to provide a barrier-free
> environment for the differently abled."
>
> Nelson: "Differently abled? I've only one arm and one eye and I refuse
> even to hear mention of the word. I didn't get to the rank of admiral by
> playing the disability card."
> Hardy: "Actually, sir, you did. The Royal Navy is under-represented in
> the areas of visual impairment and limb deficiency."
>
> Nelson: "Whatever next? Give me full sail. The salt spray beckons."
> Hardy:"A couple of problems there too, sir. Health and safety won't let
> the crew up the rigging without hard hats. And they don't want anyone
> breathing in too much salt - haven`t you seen the adverts?"
>
> Nelson: "I've never heard such infamy. Break out the cannon and tell
> the men to stand by to engage the enemy."
> Hardy: "The men are a bit worried about shooting at anyone, Admiral."
>
> Nelson: "What? This is mutiny."
> Hardy: "It's not that, sir. It's just that they're afraid of being
> charged with murder if they actually kill anyone. There's a couple of
> legal-aid lawyers on board, watching everyone like hawks."
>
> Nelson: "Then how are we to sink the Frenchies and the Spanish?"
> Hardy: "Actually, sir, we're not."
>
> Nelson: "We're not?"
> Hardy: "No, sir. The Frenchies and the Spanish are our European partners
> now. According to the Common Fisheries Policy, we shouldn't even be in
> this stretch of water. We could get hit with a claim for compensation."
>
> Nelson: "But you must hate a Frenchman as you hate the devil."
> Hardy: "I wouldn't let the ship's Diversity Co-ordinator hear you saying
> that sir. You'll be up on a disciplinary."
>
> Nelson: "You must consider every man an enemy, who speaks ill of your
> King."
> Hardy: "Not any more, sir. We must be inclusive in this multicultural
> age. Now put on your Kevlar vest; it's the rules. It could save your
> life."
>
> Nelson: "Don't tell me - health and safety. Whatever happened to rum,
> sodomy and the lash?"
> Hardy: "As I explained, sir, rum is off the menu! And there's a ban on
> corporal punishment."
>
> Nelson: "What about sodomy?"
> Hardy: "I believe that is now legal, sir."
>
> Nelson: "In that case - Kiss me, Hardy".
>
>
>
>
=
greekman
- 21 Oct 2011 10:22
- 12742 of 81564
Hi Haystack,
Like you I am none religious, and whilst believing that religion 'taken to esteems' has cause more trouble in this world than all other reasons put together, I for one will not offend anyone for their beliefs, as long as those beliefs have no harmful intent to others.
I have known many good none believers and many bad believers.
As to myself, I like to think that as I know the difference between good and bad, that often makes me a better person than those pious people who preach that to be a believer makes you good, and none believers bad.
I feel that the worse part of most religions is that 'if you truly repent then all your sins are forgiven.
So if are truly sorry, 'Thats alright then'.
If all people believed in a religion that is true, IE no harm to others, love thy neighbor etc, the world would be a better place.
Unfortunately, many believe that their religion overrules all others.
As to my believe, I feel that this world would be a far better place if a few million people who don't deserve to be on this earth, example Qaddafi, were taken out, it would be a far better place.
No doubt some would feel that if I advocated that action it would mean I was playing 'God' and perhaps it would, but it would certainly improve things quite a lot.
Skinny,
Brilliant, have forwarded it on to several friends.
Regards Greek.
Haystack
- 21 Oct 2011 11:24
- 12743 of 81564
I have often wondered how many very intelligent people have managed to believe in religion. I can see how they are indoctrinated from an early age, which is the initial cause. However, you would have thought that later in life, when they can evaluate things better their views would change. I went through the religious mill. I went to a convent primary school and then a grammar school run by Jesuit priests. The best part was the Jesuits, who encouraged independent thinking. It was during that period that I realised what a lot of nonsense it all was.
I saw an item on CBS News last night that helps to explain the fact tat intelligent people still believe in some extra-terrestrial being loosely called god. The item was about Steve Jobs and his biggest regret.
He had pancreatic cancer of a type that is normally survivable. He was told that an operation to remove the tumour would be needed and the likelihood was that he would get better. He chose instead to go on a macro-biotic diet with organic vegetables etc. This was odd bearing in mid that there is no evidence that it would be effective. It is even more strange bearing in mind that this no ordinary person. This is someone in the top fraction of a percentage of intelligent people with supposedly strong critical faculties. The outcome is well known. After several years of his 'alternative' therapy, he realised that he had been wrong. He then opted for the operation and it was found that the cancer had spread to surrounding tissue that could not be removed. They cut out what they could and told him that he had just a limited time left. He said that his biggest regret was not listening to his mind and instead following some irrational belief. He said that on reflection that he was surprised that he had chosen to go down the particular path that he had chosen and could not understand why he did against all logic.
mnamreh
- 21 Oct 2011 11:35
- 12744 of 81564
.
skinny
- 21 Oct 2011 11:48
- 12745 of 81564