markymar
- 15 Aug 2005 15:14
http://www.falklands-oil.com/
http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk
http://www.argosresources.com/


Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.
chav
- 03 Jun 2010 11:34
- 1479 of 6294
RKH 7.5% owners of whatever DES finds in 3 wells:-)
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 11:37
- 1480 of 6294
Where do you get the heavy oil from ?....put the explanation on the GKP thread thanks....we will be annoying everybody here...cheers...
chav
- 03 Jun 2010 12:34
- 1482 of 6294
RF...assume you read GKP RNS's?
http://ir2.bestex-quotes.co.uk/ir/gulfkeystone/newsArticle.php?id=141723&ST=GKP
Proselenes
- 03 Jun 2010 14:40
- 1483 of 6294
Broker note from Oriel:
"Rockhopper Exploration (RKH, BUY, 242p) - Update on Sea Lion oil quality
After a sharp move in Rockhopper's share price, the company issued a release updating the market on the preliminary findings of the oil quality encountered in the Sea Lion discovery
Analysis is currently ongoing but preliminary work in Port Stanley on a sample from the shallowest oil sand indicated a medium grade crude with an API of 26.3deg. This is consistent with the oil quality encountered by Shell in 1998
There was no update on the viscosity of the oil at this stage which will be important for productivity. Whilst there is no explicit correlation between viscosity and gravity, it does tend to improve with lower gravity crude
The crude quality is broadly consistent with the Arab Heavy grade (27deg) which has been trading at relatively tight spreads to Brent this year on a delivered basis into Europe/US (implying 5-10% discount on an FOB basis), while Mangala crude in Rajasthan (28 deg) is being sold on a pricing formula which has historically been at a 10-15% discount to Brent. Our indicative NAV/boe at US$80/bbl long-run of US$8.5/boe for the North Falklands assumes a 15% discount to Brent long-run. It should be stressed that the discount applied in our models is very preliminary at this stage with a number of factors impacting oil quality (including viscosity, sulphur content, wax content etc.) which have yet to be confirmed
Whilst there was no updated resource guidance on the discovery, the tone of the announcement suggested that pre-drill estimates (CPR P50 of 170mmb) are likely to be still intact in our view or potentially exceeded
Based on the pre-drill P50 reserve number, we would value Sea Lion at c570p/sh before taking account of any dilution which is likely given Rockhopper will need further funding to appraise the discovery
We view this update positively and with further updates due in the coming days we re-iterate our BUY recommendation."
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 14:48
- 1484 of 6294
Already posted.....do you lot go round from broker to broker digging up this stuff...?....please Chav ...no excuses.....post it,... the article on GKP....why knock a massive oil discovery..?..
chav
- 03 Jun 2010 15:21
- 1485 of 6294
I have posted the relevant line out of the RNS already RF, plus the link...are you that one eyed?
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 15:27
- 1486 of 6294
You were on about Shaikan being heavy oil....if you want to carry on with this nonsense put it on GKP...
chav
- 03 Jun 2010 16:10
- 1487 of 6294
Shaikan has 1-2 Billion bbls 17-20 API oil....heavy man!...plus it has some very sweet Oil.
You keep bring GKP here Pal!
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 16:12
- 1488 of 6294
You do not know what you are talking about....I'm not going to carry on discussing this crap...end...
greekman
- 03 Jun 2010 16:16
- 1489 of 6294
Once the point has been made, why don't you just leave it. If we are interested, the rest of us can and do make up our minds who is right after researching those points made in the first couple of posts.
This is fast becoming a kiddies playground thread, with repeated, Yes it is, No it isn't.
Please post any sensible info, or none at all, it's getting annoying and boring.
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 16:18
- 1490 of 6294
Exactly....why does he just not post the rns saying it's heavy crude on the GKP thread...he's got it wrong that's it....over.
halifax
- 03 Jun 2010 16:20
- 1491 of 6294
where is the squelch button?
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 16:23
- 1492 of 6294
Anyway...off subject...take a quick look at PMO,NPE and EO.----at this point probably the best bet is EO.
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 16:30
- 1493 of 6294
I've been squelched by Tweenie on the Stanelco happy go lucky thread....I wonder how she's getting on ?...must pop by one of these days to see...
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 19:36
- 1494 of 6294
Anybody on here know the difference between heavy, medium (if there is such a thing) and light oil....in api or so called terms ?....hang on !....Marky says that that is medium oil...
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 22:08
- 1496 of 6294
The 2 api's are so close....hmmm....and not too far apart as the crow flies.
required field
- 03 Jun 2010 22:15
- 1497 of 6294
I suppose that tar sands like in Canada are an even further step below.....there was an article in the national geographic magazine, I think last year about that....
cynic
- 03 Jun 2010 23:27
- 1498 of 6294
RF .... for crying out loud, stop the crap ..... we do not know the quantum, but assuredly we do know that this is medium grade crude ..... and yes, tar sands produce horrible thick gooey muck which is both difficult to extract and expensive to refine, and hence only commercially viable when the underlying crude price is high .... is it high enough now? .... possibly is my guess