Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Please suggest any Improvements you would like to see on AM (IDEA)     

Crocodile - 24 Jan 2003 22:24

There is a really good tech team here, lets give them some ideas for enhancements or to cure any bugs we find.

Kayak - 03 Feb 2003 19:23 - 148 of 220

Gausie, why, do you have days more interesting than that??

Gausie - 03 Feb 2003 19:29 - 149 of 220

sure

Why, only last friday I had three windows open, one to Traders' Room and two to Investors' Room. Refreshed a thread in TR, login screen came up. Login screen however said "currently logged in as Gausie". Didn't do anything, moved to one of the IR windows which was on thread list and refreshed that. Top of thread list then said "you are not currently logged in". Refreshed again a couple of times, same result. Then clicked on a thread link in IR, login screen came up, again saying "currently logged in as Gausie". Now both windows are on login screen. Refreshed both, still on login screen and still saying logged in. Pressed "Back" on IR screen and refreshed, now said "currently logged in as Gausie" on thread list, and works as normal. Same in TR. Never actually logged in again.

It was wild.

Kayak - 03 Feb 2003 19:40 - 150 of 220

Oh OK, you're perfectly entitled to be blasabout it then.

Mr Ashley James - 03 Feb 2003 19:44 - 151 of 220

Yes, a Concrete Ban on any PDX Threads, automatic lock down of all existing PDX Threads, and a trial period to see how Gausie and Hoots handle same (;-o

mbbcat - 03 Feb 2003 20:14 - 152 of 220

Heatmaps


Just one list of BB threads to sort through!

alecm - 05 Feb 2003 09:46 - 153 of 220

Just a quickie, when i put a link on here, it is not 'live'... am i doing something wrong, or do you do it slightly different on this site..?? TIA

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 05 Feb 2003 10:51 - 154 of 220

alecm,

You need to actually code the HTML for the link at the moment:

ie:
<a href="http://www.yoururlgoeshere">http://www.yoururlgoeshere</a>

HTH

zzaxx99 - 05 Feb 2003 12:11 - 155 of 220

re: #94 - I note that the standards of accuracy have continued. In the report on BOC's figures, "down by" confused with "down to" - would have given a little frisson to any BOC holders who read that before they checked the price.

On a related tack, how do you search for, or scroll through past stories once they're not on the front page?

Mr Ashley James - 05 Feb 2003 12:37 - 156 of 220

A system that works and something worth reading on the bulletin boards?

cyclist - 05 Feb 2003 14:48 - 157 of 220

How about an easy way to see the benefits offered by your premium services !

alecm - 05 Feb 2003 18:37 - 158 of 220

AAhhh, thanks Tulletj

dodgydave - 03 Mar 2003 08:28 - 159 of 220

Technical request.

Could you please change to simple password authentication, like most other sites.
I want to be able to access pages using

http://username:password@pageURL

We're not talking official secrets here so I can't see why a secure login page is really necessary.

Kayak - 03 Mar 2003 08:31 - 160 of 220

MoneyAM, we've got dodgydave here wanting you to decrease security :-))

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 03 Mar 2003 08:42 - 161 of 220

dodgydave,

We have chosen this way of password authentication as it means that there are no circumstances where it is sent over the wire is clear text (the login pages are all on a secure https connection)

You will find more and more sites (comdirect, tradindex etc etc) do use, or will start to use this method.

Now that the login problems we were experiencing appear to be successfully resolved, and you can save your login details, why the need to move to basic authentication?

The only reason I can see for wanting basic authentication is to use automated scripts...?

Am I missing something? :)

J.

dodgydave - 04 Mar 2003 11:06 - 162 of 220

TullettJ

No, I'm not planning on using automated scripts ;} Just want to make first access to password protected pages like the Investors Room a bit quicker.

When you say "you can save your login details", are you referring to the checkbox on the login page? If so, this option doesn't work for me. Tried it with cookies fully enabled but I was always redirected to the login page on first visit. Checked with both IE6 and Netscape 7.1.

Anyhow, cookies are machine specific. I often use other peoples PCs and don't want my login details stored on their machine. For my own security reasons(!) I much prefer to have permanent cookies disabled.

I realise that brokers and spread betters use more secure login methods - financial transactions are involved. Can't see that accessing something like the Investors Room falls into the same category ;}

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 04 Mar 2003 14:02 - 163 of 220

dodgydave,

It is worth knowing that if you specify the url with http://:@website.com, some of the less intelligent proxy servers log this whole request, including the username/password.

We are not going to take the backwards step and go to basic authentication as there would be many other issues with doing this.

the 'save your login details' meerly populates the fields with the values, it is not meant to log you directly in.

J.

Kayak - 04 Mar 2003 14:12 - 164 of 220

The problem is not so much with proxy servers, but when you click away from the site e.g. by clicking on a link on the BB. The site you go to will log the URL which sent you there, which includes your username and password. This will appear in the site administrator's log and it also will stand out from all the others given its format.

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 04 Mar 2003 14:14 - 165 of 220

Kayak,

I was just coming to that :D

J.

Kayak - 04 Mar 2003 14:16 - 166 of 220

:-)

There's work for you on the bugs thread :-))

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 04 Mar 2003 15:01 - 167 of 220

Yeah, found it myself last night, the people who need to know, know, and will be working on it.

J.
Register now or login to post to this thread.