Couple of posts on AFN :
longshanks - 8 Jun'08 - 22:05 - 675 of 676
Interesting article that I came across, written by Paul Markillie, innovation editor of The Economist.
http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/story/screech
Bit that got my attention was:
As cars have got more powerful, their braking performance has had to improve. Carbon-ceramic brakes will slowly make the journey, from super cars to luxury cars and, eventually, all the way down to the Renault Clio. This is because not only do they excel at the main job of stopping a car, they also help in other ways too.
PapalPower - 9 Jun'08 - 04:01 - 676 of 676
Longshanks, high oil is a mixed blessing. Short term its not good for SCE as demand for super cars declines a bit.
Longer term it is the driver needed to get carbon ceramic brakes on to cars, and also airplanes.
Apart from the obvious braking enhancement, a major upside is reduced weight. Reduced weight = higher fuel efficiency = cheaper running costs.
Therefore, the higher the oil price goes, the quicker the ROI for carbon ceramic brakes is, and so the more likely thats its adoption becomes more widespread.
The weight savings on airplanes is much more than cars, as the massive heat sinks on normal brakes are no longer needed on carbon-ceramic. Therefore, as aviation fuel price rises, the ROI on conversion to carbon-ceramic becomes more quick, and there is a case for conversion of old, as well of course as for brand new places.
Hopefully, in the shorter interim period the sales of rocket propulsion system components can fill what might be a downturn for brakes in cars (and its due to be significant for the first time in 2009 onwards), and then we can see more widespread car brake sales as oil prices cut harder, and the first signs of aircraft orders.