.

m
thanks
now we all know who you are and where you stand.
personally i prefer to be truthfull
regards
jkd

jkb the people who matter know am thruthfull

You got a problem keep it off the thread my mail box is open...

I think this could well get much cheaper ahead.......... quite simply.

RNS is official. Its 100% true and its regulated.

Phone calls, chit chat, house brokers and the like is "spin". When a company releases an RNS and then many other people, and indeed company people, try to tell you off the record what it should mean, well that means that officially the RNS is correct and they know people will not like it, but then they try to spin it in unofficial ways, nudge nudge wink wink............

If people need to "spin" an RNS and try to say its now what it seemed then you can be sure it was interpreted correctly and now the "fire brigade" are out trying to put out the fires they knew would start but could not do anything about as RNS has to be factually correct and no lies or spin or BS.

seq lol 1667 & 1668 - glad you agree that buys will often show as sells then

i was simply stating all sites such as moneyam etc in their daily buy / sell / unknown trade indicator cumlative totals often show a totally inaccurate qty set to each of these definitions - moneyam itself was way out yetsterday as the majority of xel 'sells; were really buys at that time - some of them my own buys! i did not say it was a conspiracy but it is fact and the mms like the confusion it can cause people who do not understand and will exploit this as far as the rules will allow them to - they do sail close to the wind! using the knowledge that the majority of xel sells yesterday were actually buys and some other analysis enabled me to turn a nice profit here quickly - of course some of the sells were real sells by people who panic and believe that all sells were really sells when they were not!

keep up your funny posts

xel - not worried for my long term holding - meanwhile good trading prospects - its a win win either strategy utilised correctly!

more smoke and mirrors for the AGM?

welcome to the club marky ..... i usually ignore, but it can get tiresome when persistent

So annyone with cognitave tendencies know what that latesr RNS means to the value of the co.- bearing in mind the last sentence re.-----


There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the contingent resources noted above.

not much point in the excersise then?

That bit worries me to........they're covering themselves in either direction.,.

interesting day ahead - anticipate some more profit here today - very helpful rns

seq i see you are shorting then - no big deal that sentence - standard wording and sensible to add that to be in line with rns requirements - no one can actually promise anything not just xel but anywhere lol

baler they all do - dont worry abpout it - chance to make some easy splosh here today AGAIN in addition to any long term holding imo

Mr S is as always full of piss and vinegar but no balls

lower it drops the better - then bounce - same old here

ditto that c

whats your stance on this latest rns cyners.,.

gibby

your cognitive slip is showing, I haven`t ever shorted this one, but that statement is a bit like BP saying that their profits will increase next year , if they-hopefully- find some oil, too many silly comments from this bod, like " the share price will treble", they would do better to stick to facts, but I doubt they will, watch the BS at the AGM for fun!

lol

cynic reported to abuse-again, ban coming

hi BB ..... as i mentioned earlier, i wouldn't be a new buyer but having sold most of mine (at a thumping loss), i am happy to sit with the rump to see what happens .... however, i see sp has dumped again (175/180) so the market obviously doesn't like what it sees

Nobody was fooled by that desperate RNS them, now where -150p?

thanks cynic.,.