Proselenes
- 22 Oct 2009 11:14
.
Sequestor
- 17 May 2011 16:00
- 1734 of 3002
So they have halved their target, you couldn`t make it up
gibby
- 18 May 2011 07:58
- 1737 of 3002
interesting chatter circling xel.... what was effectively a reserve update conf yesterday to 87m contingent reserves to total 115m is now considered cheap by the city - apparently - expect some blue here today - we shall see
other good news as mm states - rubbish has been fired - agm etc
gibby
- 18 May 2011 08:13
- 1738 of 3002
excellent!
Proselenes
- 18 May 2011 08:14
- 1739 of 3002
New advisors - says one thing.
Placing/Fund Raising on the way............. lets see if the rumours of 200p were correct when it happens a few weeks down the line.
Sequestor
- 18 May 2011 08:20
- 1740 of 3002
The new advisors will be looking closely at the bod now,
watch this space
cynic
- 18 May 2011 17:53
- 1741 of 3002
it doesn't matter about what (shale) oil canada does or doesn't have ..... XEL's stuff, now of debatable quantity, is in the north sea lest you had not noticed! ..... anyway, the AGM clearly excited (sorry about the pun) no one, nor scared them either
Sequestor
- 18 May 2011 18:17
- 1742 of 3002
Well oddly enough I DO know where the North Sea is---so?
oh and show me a car running on their oil.
People get so carried away with BS from these people, suddenly every one holding a handful of dubious oily shares is an expert petrologist ( study of rocks dearie)
Balerboy
- 18 May 2011 18:57
- 1743 of 3002
I think another F*ck off coming......;))
Sequestor
- 18 May 2011 19:52
- 1744 of 3002
I expect nothing less.
cynic
- 18 May 2011 20:15
- 1745 of 3002
Mr S ..... there is no question that heavy oil is much more difficult to extract and to refine, but there are many more uses for crude than running your aston martin ... i concur that XEL's latest report was pretty uninspiring, but nevertheless they do seem to have a commercial field, even if not quite to the extravagant claims previously predicted
btw, i am no "expert petrologist" and have never pretended to be, but through my biz, i do have at least some minimal knowledge .... and your "claim to fame" is what exactly?
Balerboy
- 18 May 2011 20:31
- 1746 of 3002
oh dear......another "Top analyst" coming.,.
gibby
- 18 May 2011 20:42
- 1747 of 3002
lol
jkd
- 18 May 2011 20:51
- 1748 of 3002
now now boys an gals.
anyway wheres my dictionary, a couple of words i need to look up.and no Bb not one of yours-;)
and why does S have to have a claim to fame?
just wondering and just my view and opinion as always.
regards to you all.
jkd
dreamcatcher
- 18 May 2011 22:40
- 1751 of 3002
My view, were the board of directors to big to ask for help. Now look at the cost. I would have thought top advisors would have gone over the report before it being made public. It was just to important to not word or get it over to the investors, in a understanding way.
jkd
- 18 May 2011 23:19
- 1752 of 3002
m
are they your notes?
if not maybe you would like to confirm who's and when, as you give no details or references whatsoever.
many thanks
jkd