Mr Blunkett, are you laughing at us?
Surely he must be!
He must be having a right laugh at us for us daring to have our criticism on him spending our money on a train ticket for his 'alleged girl friend' and fast tracking her visa application!
He's had a leisurely rest, pocketed 18,000 compensation for loss of office because he was a naughty boy and had to resign from office becaus of the dishonourable thing he had done, but is now is back doing the thing he was not able to do before, namely act as a goverment cabinet minister, and doesn't even have to repay his compensation.
Oh, and I'm sure you might have read too, how when he lost office, he didn't even have to move out of his 'grace and favour' London home!
Sheesh! Bloody politicians!
From
http://news.scotsman.com/....
Pressure on Blunkett to give back his 18,000
JAMES KIRKUP
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT
DAVID Blunkett was last night under pressure to return an 18,000 pay-off he received upon leaving the Cabinet in December, only to return to government last month.
Mr Blunkett, now the work and pensions secretary, was not the only Labour minister to benefit from the rules on retirement payments and then return to the government payroll.
The furore over the severance payments, to which all departing ministers are legally entitled, yesterday put Downing Street on the back foot.
Beverley Hughes, who was appointed children's minister last month, quit as immigration minister last April. Based on her time on her old ministerial salary, she was therefore entitled to almost 9,500 in severance.
Other official figures from the Cabinet Office suggested that Alan Milburn, a close ally of Tony Blair, the Prime Minister, would have been entitled to more than 35,000 in taxpayers' money over the past two years.
In June 2003 Mr Milburn resigned as health secretary for personal reasons, which gave him the option to receive about 17,800 in severance. He returned to the Cabinet as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster last September only to quit again after the general election in May. The second resignation entitled him to 18,275.
The payments to ministers leaving the government derive from a 1991 law passed by John Major's Conservative government. It also compensates MPs who lose their seats. The severance payments were unearthed by Norman Baker, a Liberal Democrat MP who called the pay-outs to returning ministers "grotesque" and said Mr Blunkett should return the money concerned.
The Conservatives also attacked the pay-offs. Chris Grayling, the shadow leader of the House of Commons, accused Labour of abusing ministerial rules.
"This wouldn't be allowed in a commercial company, and shouldn't be allowed in government," he said. "When the last Conservative government introduced these redundancy payments for ministers, they were intended for those who actually left government, not for those taking a break and coming back again soon after."
A spokeswoman for Mr Blair yesterday failed to back Mr Blunkett.
"The rules and regulations apply to all members of parliament as well as to ministers," she said. But while the spokeswoman said she was not aware of any plans to review the rules, she was non-committal on whether Mr Blunkett should to keep the payment despite his rapid return to public office.
It was "up to individual members" whether they chose to accept the retirement payments, she said.
Mr Blunkett and his aides are understood to be furious that the Liberal Democrats have raised the issue of severance packages. The pay-off was justified to cover a "modest period of readjustment" following Mr Blunkett's departure from government, his office said.