Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Empyrean Energy (EME) (EME)     

PapalPower - 21 Nov 2005 08:12

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EME&Size=big.chart?symb=uk%3Aeme&compidx=aaaaa%3AEmpyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

Big Al - 09 Apr 2010 09:57 - 1994 of 2087

The above is all rather worrying. You must be in deep doo-doo to enlarge the number of shares in issue at such a low price hot on the heels of the previous loan.

Wonder what the odds are of this going bust. They seem to increase all the time now.

cynic - 09 Apr 2010 10:10 - 1995 of 2087

but who were the mugs who accepted the placing shares?

Big Al - 14 Apr 2010 09:44 - 1996 of 2087

Another 35m shares at 6p

niceonecyril - 14 Apr 2010 11:06 - 1997 of 2087

Now why would hardened investors(in the present climate) throw 3.5million at such a useless company????
cyril
p.s. perhaps they're trying to get it on the cheap?

cynic - 14 Apr 2010 11:07 - 1998 of 2087

because they are stupid and/or they have taken additional security against the company or its directors
and why would you want to follow them?

niceonecyril - 14 Apr 2010 12:26 - 1999 of 2087

I'll reverse that question and ask."why are you taking an interest in a share you've so little time for"?
cyril

cynic - 14 Apr 2010 13:32 - 2000 of 2087

because i so choose

Balerboy - 14 Apr 2010 13:40 - 2001 of 2087

thats not answering the question cynic, why are you here?? am out myself.

Big Al - 14 Apr 2010 13:48 - 2002 of 2087

I think people are entitled to comment on companies they have no holding in. What is it that some think if you don't hold you shouldn't post? Nuts.

Balerboy - 14 Apr 2010 13:58 - 2003 of 2087

chill big al, only stirring cynic, good day so far.

cynic - 14 Apr 2010 14:20 - 2004 of 2087

serves you right Emu - lol!

Big Al - 14 Apr 2010 15:18 - 2005 of 2087

Wasn't necessarily getting at you, Balerboy. I just get so fed up on threads that someone should not voice an opinion on a company if they've no position in it. All views should be welcome in order to generate some objective debate and not the usual ramping ramblings of some plonker who hasn't a clue! Complete bollox IMO.

;-))

Balerboy - 14 Apr 2010 20:27 - 2006 of 2087

Must be refering to you cynic......:))

cynic - 14 Apr 2010 21:58 - 2007 of 2087

Emu - you're slagging the wrong person

niceonecyril - 14 Apr 2010 22:27 - 2008 of 2087

Al i don't see what your problem is,no great ramping or stiffling of debate IMO? I would be interested to hear your views on why institutions would
invest 3.6m in a company worth 7.9M, effectively taking a 1/3rd stake,to help us debate it?
cyril

niceonecyril - 14 Apr 2010 22:30 - 2009 of 2087

Cynic answer to your question is below,eme have 38%.

http://www.vicpet.com.au/farmin/eagle_feb03.pdf

And this
From September:


"R&M is currently finalising discussions with the JV partners in regards to the acquisition of approximately 20 square miles of 3D seismic over the project area. The seismic acquisition will evaluate at least two other shallower zones of interest in addition to the Gatchell Sands that are known to contain oil".

Makes me cynical?lol. You can also throw in Glantel a potentially hugh
CBM asset in Germany,so you can see it's not all about Sugar Loaf?

cyril

niceonecyril - 15 Apr 2010 07:19 - 2010 of 2087

http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20100415/pdf/31pslfsdwgyyf0.pdf
cyril

cynic - 15 Apr 2010 07:51 - 2011 of 2087

at what price did you make your spiffing investment here?

niceonecyril - 03 May 2010 11:58 - 2012 of 2087


http://www.asx.com.au


EKA up over 1/3rd in the last week,10%+ on the strength of MORGAN.

cyril

niceonecyril - 04 May 2010 08:16 - 2013 of 2087

Empyrean Energy PLC
('Empyrean' or the 'Company', (EME))

Glantal Project, Germany


Empyrean Energy Plc advises that it does not intend to apply for an extension,
nor new permit application, over the Neues Bergland Permit, covering the Glantal
and Lautertal Prospects in Germany.

This decision has been made with the intention of focusing the company's efforts
on its American assets. Recent results from the Texas based Sugarloaf Project,
in particular, justify the decision to focus the company's resources in part on
the development of this exciting Eagleford Shale and Austin Chalk discovery.



"Recent results from the Texas based Sugarloaf Project,
in particular, justify the decision to focus the company's resources in part on
the development of this exciting Eagleford Shale and Austin Chalk discovery"
cyril
Register now or login to post to this thread.