Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

JD WETHERSPOONS (JDW)     

BAYLIS - 17 Jan 2008 13:06

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=JDW&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=WTB&Si. Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=WTB&Si

skinny - 25 Jul 2013 07:17 - 209 of 267

Jefferies International Buy 750.00 750.00 600.00 850.00 Reiterates

Citigroup Neutral 0.00 750.00 - 765.00 Retains

JP Morgan Cazenove Neutral 0.00 750.00 520.00 725.00 Upgrades

skinny - 26 Jul 2013 15:25 - 210 of 267

Morgan Stanley Equal weight 769.50 - 710.00 Reiterates

skinny - 13 Sep 2013 07:03 - 211 of 267

Preliminary Results

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS


52 weeks to 28 July 2013

Before exceptional items
52 weeks to 28 July 2013 Excluding week 53
● Revenue £1,280.9m (2012: £1,197.1m)
+7.0%
+9.3%
● Like-for-like sales
+5.8%
● Operating profit £111.3m (2012: £107.3m)
+3.7%
+6.0%
● Profit before tax and exceptional items £76.9m (2012: £72.4m)
+6.3%
+8.8%
● Earnings per share (excluding shares held in trust) 46.8p (2012: 41.3p)
+13.3%
● Earnings per share (including shares held in trust) 44.8p (2012: 39.8p)
+12.6%
● Full year dividend 12.0p (2012: 12.0p)
Maintained

After exceptional items

● Operating profit £91.5m (2012: £93.8m)
-2.5%
● Profit before tax £57.1m (2012: £58.9m)
-3.0%
● Basic earnings per share 38.3p (2012: 35.6p)
+7.6%

skinny - 06 Nov 2013 07:09 - 212 of 267

Interim Management Statement

JD Wetherspoon plc ('JD Wetherspoon' or the 'Company') announces its Interim Management Statement for the period up to 6 November 2013, incorporating the 13 week period to 27 October 2013, as required by the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency rules.

Current trading

In the first quarter (13 weeks to 27 October 2013), like-for-like sales increased by 3.7% and total sales by 7.6%.

The operating margin was 8.3%, approximately 0.3% lower than the same period in the last financial year, mainly due to increased labour, repairs, marketing and central overheads. The company believes that this increased expenditure will benefit the future performance of the business. The margin in the quarter is a possible indicator for this financial year, assuming we achieve reasonable sales growth.

Property

The Company opened 8 new pubs in the quarter and has 12 more under development. We now anticipate opening 40 to 50 pubs in total this year, slightly more than previously anticipated, helped by our increased bank facility and a number of recent acquisitions.

Financial position

There have been no significant changes in the Company's overall financial position, since the publication, on 11 October 2013, of the annual report and accounts for the year ended 28 July 2013.

Outlook

As previously indicated, the biggest danger to the pub industry is the VAT disparity between supermarkets and pubs. Since supermarkets pay almost no VAT in respect of food sales, whereas pubs pay 20%, supermarkets are able to subsidise their drinks' prices to the detriment of pubs, around 10,000 of which have closed in the last decade. It does not make economic or social sense for the government to favour powerful supermarkets with what amounts to a "tax break", especially since pubs generate so many more jobs, and so much more tax, per pint or meal, than supermarkets.

In spite of the continued pressure from costs and taxes, the company remains confident of a reasonable outcome for the current financial year.

mitzy - 19 Dec 2013 15:21 - 213 of 267

Not as cheap as they used to be but I have no complaints with the service(which can be slow) and the barmen are friendly.

goldfinger - 19 Dec 2013 15:28 - 214 of 267

Have you seen the volume in this one today.

Huge.

mitzy - 19 Dec 2013 15:30 - 215 of 267

Yes it is goldfinger doing well I expect this xmas.

goldfinger - 19 Dec 2013 15:49 - 216 of 267

Think Ill buy tomorrow Mitzy if present momentum carries.

mitzy - 19 Dec 2013 16:50 - 217 of 267

good luck gf.

cynic - 19 Dec 2013 17:53 - 218 of 267

sp is clearly on the cusp of breaking into new all-time high ground ..... it looks to have tried today, but then slipped back to the key point

BAYLIS - 15 Jan 2014 15:42 - 219 of 267

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=WTB&Si

RED WTB and BLUE JDW

skinny - 22 Jan 2014 07:06 - 220 of 267

Pre-close Statement

J D Wetherspoon plc ('J D Wetherspoon' or the 'Company'), announces an update on current trading, before entering its closed period for its interim results, for the six months ending 26 January 2014, which are expected to be announced on 14 March 2014.

Current trading

For the first 12 weeks of the second quarter (to 19 January 2014), like-for-like sales increased by 6.7% and total sales by 10.6%. In the year to date (25 weeks to 19 January 2014), like-for-like sales increased by 5.2% and total sales increased by 9.0%.

We expect the operating margin (before any exceptional items), for the half year ending 26 January 2014, to be around 8.1%, 0.2% lower than the same period last year, due primarily to increased investment in a number of areas, for example, (IT, training and additional operating personnel) as we prepare for an increased number of pubs in the years ahead. We now estimate an operating margin (before any exceptional items) in the region of 8.1% to 8.3% for this financial year, assuming that we achieve reasonable sales growth.

We now anticipate a slightly higher corporation tax rate for this financial year, at around 27%, due to higher-than-expected non-qualifying capital expenditure.

Property

The Company has opened 18 new pubs so far this financial year and currently has 11 sites under development. In line with previous estimates, we intend to open approximately 40 to 50 pubs in the current financial year.

Financial position

In the period under review, the Company bought back 411,000 shares for cancellation, at a total cost of £2.9 million, at an average price of £6.98 per share. The Company also entered into agreements to fix the interest rates on part of its existing debt from July 2018 to July 2023 at rates which are lower than the average rate currently being paid (see note 4 below). There have been no significant changes in the Company's overall financial position since the publication, on 11 October 2013, of the annual report and accounts for the year ended 28 July 2013.

Outlook

As the Company has pointed out on previous occasions, the pub industry continues to pay far higher taxes than supermarkets do, mainly as a result of an unequal and unfair VAT and business rates burden. This tax inequality has greatly widened the pricing differential for beer and other products between the on and off trade. Approximately 10,000 pubs have shut down in the last decade, about 15% of the total, and these closures are certain to continue unless politicians and governments create a fair tax system. Since pubs generate much higher taxes and many more jobs per pint or per meal than supermarkets do, tax equality would be beneficial for the wider economy, as well as the pub industry.
We have highlighted the impact on our margin of the increased investment which we are making to prepare for an increased number of pubs and the continued pressure from taxes. Assuming reasonable sales growth, the Company is targeting a reasonable outcome for the current financial year.

skinny - 14 Mar 2014 07:08 - 221 of 267

Half Yearly Report

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS





Ÿ Revenue £683.2m (2013: £626.4m) +9.1%
Ÿ Like-for-like sales +5.2%
Ÿ Operating profit £55.7m (2013: £52.1m) +7.0%
Ÿ Profit before tax & exceptional items £37.8m (2013: £34.8m) +8.5%
Ÿ Earnings per share 22.1p (2013: 20.0p) +10.5%
Ÿ Interim dividend 4.0p (2013: 4.0p) Maintained

After exceptional items


Ÿ Profit before tax £36.0m (2012: £34.8m) +3.2%

Ÿ Earnings per share 20.7p (2013: 20.0p) +3.5%

Diego Rodriguez - 12 May 2014 12:50 - 222 of 267

The problem also is the difference on tax between pubs and supermarkets. JD Wetherspoon webcast http://ift.tt/1l2vj5O.

skinny - 09 Jul 2014 07:01 - 223 of 267

PRE-CLOSE STATEMENT

J D Wetherspoon plc ('J D Wetherspoon' or the 'Company') announces a pre-close statement prior to the end of the current financial year on 27 July 2014. The preliminary results are due to be announced on 12 September 2014.

Current trading

For the 10 weeks to 6 July 2014, like-for-like sales increased by 4.9%, and total sales increased by 10.3%. In the year to date (49 weeks to 6 July 2014), like-for-like sales increased by 5.4%, and total sales increased by 9.8%. Sales have been slightly weaker during the World Cup.

The operating margin, in the 10 weeks to 6 July 2014, was 8.1%, in line with 8.1% year-to-date (49 weeks to 6 July 2014) - and the full year is now expected to be around this level. In the next financial year, we expect the operating margin to be in the region of 7.7% to 8.1%, subject to the level of like-for-like sales, the number of new openings and cost pressures.

Property

The Company has opened 40 new pubs and closed five since the start of the financial year. We have eight sites under development and, in line with our last update, intend to open around 45 pubs in the current financial year. Our plans are to open around 30-40 pubs in the following financial year.

Financial position

The Company has bought back 2,278,108 shares, at a total cost of £18.5 million, since the start of the financial year. There have been no other significant changes in the Company's overall financial position since the publication of the interim management statement on 7 May 2014.

Outlook

The major threat to the pub industry, as previously indicated, is the tax inequality between pubs and supermarkets, especially in respect of VAT and business rates. This inequality has less effect in more affluent parts of the country, as illustrated in frequent comments from pub companies and analysts about regional trading patterns, but is the main factor in pubs' closures in swathes of northern England, Scotland and south Wales, for example. A growing political realisation of the impact of the 10,000 pub closures in the last decade on high streets, employment, government revenues and community life has helped to reduce or reverse some harmful aspects of recent onerous legislation.

However, the impact of the coalition government's 'late night levy' is starting to take effect, with annual charges of up to about £4,000 per annum for pubs opening beyond midnight in Newcastle and Islington, for example.

Wetherspoon has decided to reduce opening hours from the current 1am to midnight on Fridays and Saturdays, at most of our affected pubs, as and when the levy is introduced or renewed - a retrograde step for pubs, which will have a positive impact on supermarkets, since they will benefit from earlier pub closures.

Although sales have slowed in recent weeks, the Company remains confident of a reasonable outcome in the current financial year.

skinny - 12 Sep 2014 07:44 - 224 of 267

Preliminary Results

optomistic - 13 Oct 2014 16:45 - 225 of 267

Tim Martin's views on corporate governance....

RNS Number : 1677U

Wetherspoon (JD) PLC

13 October 2014

For immediate release

JD Wetherspoon plc

Press article

The following article first appeared in Propel on 13 October 2014 and is repeated to further its distribution. It represents the personal views of Tim Martin, chairman of JD Wetherspoon plc, and builds on comments he has made in the last two annual reports of JD Wetherspoon.

"

Breaking News - Opinion Special: Tim Martin criticises corporate governance

The ruinous absurdity of corporate governance by Tim Martin

Woof, woof! What's that at the boardroom door? Why, it's the dog that hasn't barked - until now. This corporate governance dog has surreptitiously devoured our major banks and pub companies and has moved on to make mincemeat of our biggest supermarkets. Like Frankenstein, the carnivorous canine has outgrown its corporate governance creators and is munching its way hungrily through our finest companies.

The dog has been lucky so far: corporate mayhem has been blamed on others. Gordon Brown mendaciously blamed bankers' troubles on sub-prime American loans. Others have blamed "hot money", the Bank of England or greedy and incompetent executives, perhaps forgetting that they were appointed through the governance system, which created the dog in the first place.

The travails of our biggest pub companies, for example, beset in recent years by various corporate catastrophes, have been lain at the door of the smoking ban or changing consumer tastes, rather than the governance industry itself. Supermarket troubles have been blamed on aggressive foreign companies, the internet and high prices, but the dog had not been identified, until recently, as the main source of the devastation.

However, the Tesco fiasco may have let the cat out of the bag. One of the greatest absurdities of the governance system is that you can comply with the rules and have, as many companies do, only two executives on the PLC board. If they fall out, or one leaves for any reason, you only have one, and if you're unlucky you may, like Tesco, end up with none, a dangerous void for a major company. In fact, only two or three executive directors is a dangerous void.

The far more widespread malaise though, under the radar until now, is that so-called compliant PLC boards are, in reality, highly inexperienced and unstable. The unholy combination of a majority of part-time non-executives, including the chairman, with a maximum of nine years' tenure, and CEOs who average only four or five institutionalises these weaknesses. A board led by part-timers, with a short-term chief executive, which has very little real contact or knowledge of the worlds of executives and customers, is really a sitting duck in the business jungle.

These weaknesses are compounded by a raft of other governance shibboleths: excessive emphasis on the role of shareholders (the 2012 Code refers to shareholders 63 times, employees three times and customers not at all); performance-based pay, which encourages over-borrowing in order to enhance earnings per share targets; the discouragement of CEOs becoming chairmen, exacerbating the short-term mindset of the former; autonomous board committees, manned by non-execs, operating as remote and detached satellites, clogging up company accounts with jargon-filled reports; remuneration committees which have legitimised huge pay increases; and audit committees which have effectively removed power from executives and have presided over financial Armageddon at our banks and other major companies.

The key to understanding the current problems, pointed out by journalists like Chris Blackhurst and Anthony Hilton, is that the pendulum of governance, designed to prevent Maxwell and Enron-style debacles, has swung too far the other way. The composition of the board of the Financial Reporting Council, which oversees governance, mirroring the non-executives on PLC boards, consists almost entirely of "City" types, with little experience of civvy street, let alone pub or supermarket companies. This aspect is exemplified by the appointment to update the rules of Lord Sharman formerly head of Ernst and Young and Tony Blair's main advocate for Britain to join the euro, whose financial judgement on the big issues is transparently deficient. The great and the good, les énarques, as the French say, have their role to play , but too much power has been ceded to them, to the serious detriment of corporate performance.

The nature and the tone of governance urgently need to change: if you have top CEOs like Stuart Rose at M&S or Simon Wolfson at Next, they should be encouraged, in due course, to become chairmen, subject to appropriate checks and balances. Executives should be properly represented on boards and should form a majority: the tail should not wag the dog. Performance-based pay should be consigned to the dustbin of history. There is no evidence that it does any good, and it often encourages perverse behaviour.

Britain's most senior judge, Lord Neuberger, who has seen many dogs in his day, recently said that the reaction of the authorities to failed regulation is often to produce more regulation, when what is needed is different regulation. Inexperienced yet compliant boards were intimately involved in the collapse of our banks, our pubs and our supermarkets. We now need a new system of regulation, which takes account of these factors.

Tim Martin is chairman and founder of JD Wetherspoon

skinny - 05 Nov 2014 08:03 - 226 of 267

Interim Management Statement

Current trading

For the 13 weeks to 26 October 2014, like-for-like sales increased by 6.3%, and total sales increased by 11.3%. Sales were good through August and September, but like-for-like growth decreased in October.

The operating margin in the period was 7.7%, compared with 8.3% in the same period last year. In October, the Company increased pay for hourly paid staff by 5%, while utility costs increased by about 4%. In addition, during the period, there have been several cost increases from suppliers.


Property

The Company has opened two new pubs since the start of the financial year. We have 15 pubs under development and, in line with our last update, intend to open around 30-40 pubs in the current financial year.


Financial position

The Company has agreed on an additional five-year bank facility with Handelsbanken, increasing our overall facilities to £740 million.

There have been no other significant changes in the Company's overall financial position since the publication, on 13 October 2014, of the annual report and accounts for the year ended 27 July 2014.

Pub closures and stealth taxes

In recent budgets, the chancellor has announced heavily publicised and welcome cuts in beer duty. In contrast, in an initiative which achieved little recognition, changes were announced in 2012 to the VAT treatment of pub slot or 'gaming' machines. As a result, pubs were no longer to be allowed to set off all VAT charged by suppliers against VAT charged to customers.

This legislation has been interpreted by the tax authorities so that a proportion of VAT inputs for pub businesses is disallowed. For example, if gaming machine income is 4% of a pub's sales, 4% of the pub's input VAT, in respect of certain categories of supplies (even if unrelated to gaming machines), is disallowed. This new 'tax' cost Wetherspoon an additional £3.6m during February 2013-July 2014.

These sorts of tax increase penalise pubs, which are closing in great numbers, yet not supermarkets, which already benefit from a zero VAT rate on food, whereas pubs pay 20%. Supermarkets also pay far lower business rates per pint or meal than do pubs. Indeed, this government has presided over thousands of pub closures - perhaps more than any government in history. The pub industry recognises that governments need to balance the books, yet it is imperative for the future of pubs that political parties commit themselves to a sensible rebalancing of the tax system, so that there is fairness and equality between pubs and supermarkets - a rebalancing will produce more revenue for the government and more jobs in the economy. Stealth taxes, including the new treatment for gaming machines, are confusing and unfair for publicans and are very harmful to the industry.


Outlook

The biggest financial dangers to the pub industry continue to be the VAT and business rates disparity between supermarkets and pubs and the continuing imposition of stealth taxes, such as the late-night levy and the reduced allowances for gaming machine income.

As a result of the slowdown in sales growth in October, combined with the cost increases referred to above, the Company is currently anticipating an operating margin in the range of 7.2-7.8% for the current financial year. The Company is aiming for a satisfactory outcome for the current financial year.

skinny - 21 Jan 2015 07:11 - 227 of 267

Interim Management Statement

J D Wetherspoon plc ('J D Wetherspoon' or the 'Company'), announces an update on current trading, before entering its closed period for its interim results, for the six months ending 25 January 2015, which are expected to be announced on 13 March 2015.

Current trading

For the first 12 weeks of the second quarter (to 18 January 2015), like-for-like sales increased by 2.8% and total sales by 6.8%. Like-for-like sales slowed to approximately 2% in December and have slowed further in the last fortnight. In the year to date (25 weeks to 18 January 2015), like-for-like sales increased by 4.6% and total sales increased by 9.1%.

We expect the operating margin (before any exceptional items), for the half year ending 25 January 2015, to be around 7.3%, 0.9% lower than the same period last year. This reduction is mainly due to an above-inflation increase in pay for staff and an increase in utility and supplier costs. In addition, gross margins are under pressure as a result, we believe, of increased price competition from supermarkets.

Property

The Company has opened 11 new pubs so far this financial year and currently has 10 sites under development. In line with previous estimates, we intend to open approximately 30 to 40 pubs in the current financial year.

The Company opened its second pub in the Republic of Ireland in December in Dun Laoghaire. We have completed on a further three sites in Swords, Cork and Dublin.

Financial position

In the period under review, the Company bought back 196,500 shares for cancellation, at a total cost of £1.5million, at an average price of £7.96 per share. There have been no significant changes in the Company's overall financial position since the publication, on 13 October 2014, of the annual report and accounts for the year ended 27 July 2014.

Commentary on current trading

Tim Martin, Chairman of Wetherspoon, makes the following comments on the pub industry:

"Wetherspoon has had significantly better sales growth in the last couple of years than our main competitors, reflecting a pattern that has continued since our flotation. Even Wetherspoon, however, has seen flat bar sales in the last two months, when food sales have continued to rise. Inevitably, bar sales in the industry as a whole, especially where pubs have not benefited from Wetherspoon's level of investment, will have fared less well. This situation reflects the dire need for the pub industry to campaign for equal tax treatment for pubs and supermarkets. It is certain that the current wave of pub closures, which continues at a high level, will accelerate when economic growth slows or reverses.

The majority of investment in larger pub companies has been in "food-led" businesses, which have very low levels of bar sales, apart from those which are consumed with meals. Fewer and fewer customers, outside pockets of affluence, in an accelerating trend, are using pubs for "drinking occasions", which do not involve eating. The main reason behind this trend is not that people prefer to drink at home, for example, but relates to the huge and growing price differential between pubs and supermarkets. This differential has been created and increased by the fact that business rates per pint are far higher in pubs and that supermarkets pay no VAT in respect of food, whereas pubs pay 20% - enabling supermarkets to subsidise the price of beer and other products.

A number of major pub companies believe that they can avoid the resulting malaise by investing in out-of-town pubs which are really "quasi-restaurants". Unfortunately, these businesses too are already starting to suffer the effects of the tax disparity with supermarkets and they will clearly, in our view, be unable to escape the consequences of an unequal tax system.

Neither these businesses nor the main pub industry newspaper, the Publican Morning Advertiser (PMA), have campaigned for tax equality with supermarkets. In the case of the PMA, the editor has questioned the financial motives of the leader of the tax equality campaign, Jacques Borel, but has utterly failed to campaign himself or through his newspaper for tax equality, which would help to ensure the future of pubs.

The pub industry is in a strange position, whereby market research clearly shows that almost 100% of individual licensees believe their companies should support a campaign for tax equality, yet several major pubcos and the main trade newspaper have not actively done so. Following chaos at our banks, the supermarkets themselves have recently witnessed a situation where the tectonic plates of the industry moved, even though the boardrooms at the major industry players were oblivious to this fact. That is the position now in the pub industry and the companies that do not speak out about the dangers of tax inequality are likely to be those that suffer most in the future".


Outlook

As we have previously stated, the biggest financial dangers to the pub industry continue to be the VAT and business rates disparity between supermarkets and pubs and the continuing imposition of stealth taxes, such as the late-night levy and the reduced allowances for gaming machine income.

Although the reduction in sales growth may have an impact on our operating margin if the trend continues, the company is aiming for a broadly satisfactory outcome in the current financial year.

Chris Carson - 08 Mar 2015 12:24 - 228 of 267

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=JDW&Si



SP all over the place, interim results on Friday 13th let's hope traders are not to suspicious. Bearing in mind final paragraph above:-

As we have previously stated, the biggest financial dangers to the pub industry continue to be the VAT and business rates disparity between supermarkets and pubs and the continuing imposition of stealth taxes, such as the late-night levy and the reduced allowances for gaming machine income.


So with that in mind and the Budget on the following Wednesday is there a slim chance that our George may give a boost here? Answers on a postcard. Watching.
Register now or login to post to this thread.