Proselenes
- 13 Aug 2011 04:53
.
blackdown
- 25 Sep 2012 16:18
- 2097 of 2393
I'll ignore it. That refers to the Miss P post
Proselenes
- 25 Sep 2012 16:27
- 2098 of 2393
Whoops - Shell should have been 5km further east to have Sea Lion - I always get my West and East the wrong way around :) LOL
greekman
- 25 Sep 2012 16:49
- 2099 of 2393
Proseleness has obviously spent a large amount of time and effort to produce a very in depth analysis.
To state that it is more ramping bollocks or/and ignore it is not giving it credit.
His post contains many times the words, my rough estimation, and I personally expect, coupled with very high and very low estimate variables, which shows that he is guessing just as much as anyone else. But at least he is attempting to quantify those guesses.
I have never been one to swallow posts hook, line and sinker, but my own limited research has found many similar 'potential' figures to those in his post.
I find such in depth posts at least thought provoking, far more than blunt one liners that appear to just deride, without making any attempt to give quantified opposing opinions.
Anyone with half a brain, knows full well that Scotia could come up zilch, but as with all investing, its the odds of risk v reward that are the only criteria that you can go by.
Having seen examples of Blackdowns posts that are either total rubbish, as his distorted so called facts prove (I have mentioned such posts previously) or they hold no research points or well argued opinions, I will no longer read or reply to such.
As to Halifax, I can't understand why you have gone down the road of always decrying posts, when if my memory serves me correctly, your posts used to look at both sides, then would respond in a more thought provoking manner.
We often see ramping/de-ramping posts. All post tend to fall into one of the two camps.
The difference to my mind is, do these posts attempt to justify the opinions held.
Obviously Proseleness's post does whereas the 2 following do not.
Proselenes
- 25 Sep 2012 16:57
- 2100 of 2393
greekman, its all posted to get people to think, to verify themselves, to pull me up on errors, to check by themselves so that they can hopefully get some knowledge and make their own decisions.
I have blackdown and halifax squleched, which means I do not see their posts. They know this as well, so a lot of their posts are purely childish comments - thinking that its some kind of clever game to be a kid and post a one liner....... but each to their own - I have them squleched out, and rightly so it continues to be proven.
greekman
- 25 Sep 2012 16:59
- 2101 of 2393
Blackdown is now also on my list.
required field
- 25 Sep 2012 17:10
- 2102 of 2393
Thanks for the research .......amazing the trouble you have gone to......fingers crossed for a good result......I reckon that at the very least there should be a commercial gas discovery ...but we might get oil as well...
Gerponville18
- 25 Sep 2012 17:23
- 2103 of 2393
A good read Proselenes.........I am sure we will reference your post for years to come!
Would be good though if what you have posted comes to fruition...........If not, I am sure you will need those broad shoulders "AGAIN"!!!!!!!
As stated previous, I am invested.....Quite happy with my position; hope to take my original stake prior to the RNS on scotia outcome, then just leave the free share to go high or low. If low, then back to buying at a low sp.........Just be a bugger, longer wait, that's all………It will not be the end of the world?
There is oil (IMO) in those Falklands waters, just need to find those “Sweet Spot(s)”?
halifax
- 25 Sep 2012 17:25
- 2104 of 2393
all gas and gaiters, wait for the inevitable duster, the only people making money out of the Falklands are the rig owners.
grannyboy
- 25 Sep 2012 17:45
- 2105 of 2393
Well its a good job the likes of Shell, Conoco, et al did'nt have the same attitude as you then, halifax with a small "h"
greekman
- 25 Sep 2012 17:59
- 2106 of 2393
Comments like, 'Wait for the inevitable duster' says it all.
Yet another poster not worth reading and on the squelch list.
Pathetic!
ptholden
- 25 Sep 2012 18:30
- 2107 of 2393
Greek, I have always thought you a sensible chap, head screwed on straight and not easily fooled but your stance on Proselenes is at odds with your persona. Surely you realise he is a full time ramper and uses multiple bulletin boards to promote his agendas? None of his posts are intended to help anyone but himself, I'm constantly amazed readers can't see through this. Of course his posts are comprehensive, it's his sales pitch, the less people sell and the more that buy suits his position. Believe me this type of ramping works, don't ask me how I know but it does. Don't think for one moment he is in this for the long term, his position will be closed long before results of the drill. All this crap about holding for the long term, just like Rockhopper? Be under no illusions he sold Fogl during the Char induced panic sell off, probably at a loss and bought back in when it settled down. Problem is, that he's now holding at a loss and you'll see mega ramping in the next 50 days or so, so he can recover losses on this position. Ever wondered what purpose grannyboy serves, he's another of Proselenes aliases, gb posts so that Pro can respond to Gb, whilst maintaining the illusion of squelched posters. Proselenes creates all these threads for his own ends not to help you and incidentally he knows fuck all about the oil business but gives the impression of doing so, a very dangerous poster, one who was banned from other sites as Papalpower for lying ramps. As for one line posts, one of the best posters on this site only ever gives one liners and nothing else, disregard those comments at your peril.
grannyboy
- 25 Sep 2012 19:10
- 2108 of 2393
"Ever wonder what purpose grannyboy serves, he's another of Proselenes aliases"
WRONG PISSPOTHOLDER...
At least Proselenes does some excellent research and post that as well as other information up for all to read and to make their own minds up..
Like you've just accused me of :ie what useful purpose do i serve, THAT applies more so to yourself, YOU been a small minded condecending arrogant maggot(reminds me so much of chuckles, he's not YOUR alias is he), and you certainly made up for that withering repremand of the "ONE LINE POSTS", by your last rambling waffle..
ptholden
- 25 Sep 2012 21:28
- 2109 of 2393
And on cue, the useless abusive alter ego that is grannyboy pitches up. How did your EOG ramp do? Or did you forget to sell and get locked in? Who the fuck is chuckles? I fight my own battles, exposing useless posters like you, always have and always will. You should be more careful with stuff like traceable IP addresses and imageshack / photoshop. When does Papalpower appear?
Balerboy
- 25 Sep 2012 21:57
- 2110 of 2393
I think a well said in order here.,.
grannyboy
- 25 Sep 2012 22:16
- 2111 of 2393
Edited MoneyAM
ptholden
- 25 Sep 2012 22:23
- 2112 of 2393
Touched a nerve Papalpower? Why do you think I would want to meet you? I can't think of anything I would less like to do, but I know who you are and what you are. On that, I'll leave the thread to those who have a genuine interest in Fogl, which doesn't include you.
cynic
- 25 Sep 2012 22:35
- 2113 of 2393
didn't Shell abandon FI as not being worth pursuing?
required field
- 25 Sep 2012 23:11
- 2114 of 2393
10 us dollars a barrel at the time......with no flow tests.....
Proselenes
- 26 Sep 2012 06:54
- 2115 of 2393
Someone asked if I could put the Loligo post into a PDF, so I have.
For those not interested, just ignore. For those interested a PDF link is below.
http://www.mediafire.com/?1lx5jj53wiulr7d
.
greekman
- 26 Sep 2012 07:28
- 2116 of 2393
Hi Ptholden,
I hope I am sensible (just don't ask the wife, children or granchildren) as I never take what anyone says as 100%, in fact I am one of the most cynical people I know.
All my post was trying to show is that some people do a huge amount research and all others can do is knock it down without back up facts or opinions.
I look at all posts with a view to 'how much content is worth reviewing' and not if it is a ramp or de-ramp.
About a year ago, I was accused of de-ramping a share that I had held for several years waiting for a breakthrough.
The product was a world beater (it might still be) but the management just did not appear to be able to sell it and I said so, the de-ramping accusations came flying along.
It has been the same when I saw positives in a share that was being slated by most people and said so, the ramping accusations followed.
I doubt grannyboy is a Proseleness alias as the pose of language it totally wrong.
As for grannyboy, after his last post he is on my squelch list.