.

"Ever wonder what purpose grannyboy serves, he's another of Proselenes aliases"

WRONG PISSPOTHOLDER...

At least Proselenes does some excellent research and post that as well as other information up for all to read and to make their own minds up..

Like you've just accused me of :ie what useful purpose do i serve, THAT applies more so to yourself, YOU been a small minded condecending arrogant maggot(reminds me so much of chuckles, he's not YOUR alias is he), and you certainly made up for that withering repremand of the "ONE LINE POSTS", by your last rambling waffle..

And on cue, the useless abusive alter ego that is grannyboy pitches up. How did your EOG ramp do? Or did you forget to sell and get locked in? Who the fuck is chuckles? I fight my own battles, exposing useless posters like you, always have and always will. You should be more careful with stuff like traceable IP addresses and imageshack / photoshop. When does Papalpower appear?

I think a well said in order here.,.

Edited MoneyAM

Touched a nerve Papalpower? Why do you think I would want to meet you? I can't think of anything I would less like to do, but I know who you are and what you are. On that, I'll leave the thread to those who have a genuine interest in Fogl, which doesn't include you.

didn't Shell abandon FI as not being worth pursuing?

10 us dollars a barrel at the time......with no flow tests.....

Someone asked if I could put the Loligo post into a PDF, so I have.

For those not interested, just ignore. For those interested a PDF link is below.

http://www.mediafire.com/?1lx5jj53wiulr7d

.

Hi Ptholden,

I hope I am sensible (just don't ask the wife, children or granchildren) as I never take what anyone says as 100%, in fact I am one of the most cynical people I know.
All my post was trying to show is that some people do a huge amount research and all others can do is knock it down without back up facts or opinions.
I look at all posts with a view to 'how much content is worth reviewing' and not if it is a ramp or de-ramp.
About a year ago, I was accused of de-ramping a share that I had held for several years waiting for a breakthrough.
The product was a world beater (it might still be) but the management just did not appear to be able to sell it and I said so, the de-ramping accusations came flying along.
It has been the same when I saw positives in a share that was being slated by most people and said so, the ramping accusations followed.
I doubt grannyboy is a Proseleness alias as the pose of language it totally wrong.
As for grannyboy, after his last post he is on my squelch list.

greekman, oh dear - from your post I guess some are accusing grannyboy of being me..... LOL.

Never heard such nonsense. But then these people are plain stupid. They could, if they wanted to, write to Moneyam ( email is support@moneyam.com ) and accuse me of being GB and GB of being me.

Moneyam could easily check the IP address of the two posters and work out if they are the same or not - and then ban them both of they are, or ignore the accusations if not.

But of course - doing something like that is not what these attention seeking idiots want, of course they are far more happier posting false accusations all the time - trying to get some attention for themselves.

And that is why ptholden is up on my squelched list as well. Liars, abusive posters etc... all end up squelched out totally. I do not have time to waste on them, and they really seem to take it badly when I squelch and ignore them, they come back for years posting accusations I will never see......... LOL.......... how pathetic is that ??

i confess i have never ever squelched anyone, no matter how obnoxious

I agree Proselenes is not GB. I remembered once that pt accused me of being someone else. And I think if you agree in opinion with someone he does not see eye-to-eye to, he will accuse that you are the same person.

no doubt that is why no one has ever accused me of being someone else!

Cynic sometimes I think your Richard Wilson aka Victor Meldrew!!

I just dooon't believe it....

I wouldn't knock Pro's posts, I read them, Pro to me seams ever the optimist, nothing wrong with that in my book. His research is a good place to start discounting from adding a real sense of risk into the investment.

Pro might win an award for ramper of the year, but hes not yet in the league of Edison. If his posts have in anyway made someone invest money which they have then lost then more the fool them and a sharp lesson to be learnt. I've yet to read a post I regarded as a FOGL sales pitch also.

ptholden has in fact never put in any good researchs or facts in his postings.

.

As idiotic as ever hlyeo, how's justyi? Still spouting the same crap as crap or has she been retired from active duty?
I have to admit you accusing anyone of not posting research is about as hypocritical as it gets, all you've ever done is copied and pasted, which isn't research or stated a stock is going up or down without any given thought behind the claim, invariably you get it wrong. Do jog on silly girl.

One of the exciting things I think about Loligo is when you look at the drill location to the actual targets, and appreciate the drill hit the very edges.... well.

Rightly or wrongly most people consider P10 to be the big area, 10% chance of it being good. P50 to be a smaller area than P10, but with a 50% chance of being good and then P90 to be a very small area, with a 90% chance of being good.

So, putting that into Loligo drilling location, well they appear to have hit all reservoirs in the P10 location, well away from sweet spots, right on the edges.

And yet they have net pay, albeit marginal and they have strong gas shows of C1/2/3/4/5.

If you assume therefore that the pre-drill P50 of 4.7 BBOE recoverable (25TCF recoverable dry gas basis) and assume the actual is going to be bigger than P50, but perhaps a tad under P10 and then you add on T5 additional reservoir which seems thick.........and was not in the original estimates because nobody knew it was there............

You can easily see why some people suggest Loligo could end up over 30 TCF recoverable or even over 50 TCF recoverable in size (circa 5 BBOE to 8.5 BBOE recoverable).

The market chooses to give no value - fine by me, if it can continue to assign no value for Loligo for another 9 months I will happily add more and wait for the Loligo update once 3D is done and processed and integrated with other data for a nice "Loligo" update sometime 2nd half 2013.