Todays news, Spudding os S-6.
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201112200700132888U
An interesting read.
Ray Zondetra on iii:
I rarely post on the GKP BB, but as a board director of a leading London PR agency (and owning a decent stake in GKP), this story is just so easy to read:
1. This story came from GKP IMO. Look at the detail in the story and examine the recent significant behavioural change including rushing out an RNS on a drill where they are not even the operator.
2. Classic end of story line in the Indie on Sunday - GKP "declined to comment". How many times have I needed to get a story out but insisted on this end line! Usually a condition of any leak!
3. Look at the GKP statement as stated by Hub. Having written numerous holding statements in my time for various clients for national newspapers, it's all about the EXACT wording. Ignore the eegits who claim this is a comprehensive denial, they're talking total rubbish. They have left so many options open of what could be happening you could drive a horse and cart through. When you issue a denial statement you always need to leave a way out if needed... staying two steps ahead.
4. The "baseless" claim given to the Dow news wire is a classic back covering exercise from an unnamed source at GKP. Always good to to demonstrate to your partners that you're working with them and not solely for your own interests. No wonder they remained nameless...
5. I am not surprised the RNS arrived late in the day. With clearance and approval time, including commentary from a potential army of lawyers and PR's in both Iraq and the US. The benefit of the RNS arriving late suited GKP, as newswires across the world, including - crucially - the US picked up the story BEFORE the late RNS. A 7am RNS would have prevented global pick up of the story.
6. Mark Leftly - used to cover the media patch on the IoS. Not had many dealings with him but he is well respected in the industry and a good journo.
Far more confident after today's fun and games!
GLA