MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 11:51
- 217 of 706
i bought 40k at the mid price yesterday, for some reason, my broker was able to get me in @2.55
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 13:32
- 218 of 706
no i'm pretty sure the contract note that barclays sent me this morning was for 2.55, and a friend of mine bought 19,000 fo the same price, i've got no reason to lie about something like that...
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 13:41
- 219 of 706
o'neill
you need to make sure your checking the right day it was the 13th yesterday, there were loads of trades all morning at 2.55,
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 13:42
- 220 of 706
and before you come back and try and tell me that they were all sells....
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 13:44
- 221 of 706
they are recorded as sells but not all of them were, i know for a fact because i can see my trades, size and time and price and my friends at the time he bought his recorded as sells,
apple
- 14 May 2004 14:47
- 222 of 706
oneill
I have previously seen one of my buys reported at more than the price I paid.
So MrDavis could be correct.
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 15:00
- 223 of 706
my trade is there at the price i paid, 2.55, it's just that it shows up as a sell,
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 14 May 2004 15:15
- 224 of 706
Guys,
This may help with the above - it is the disclaimer from our trades page:
It should be noted that all trade declarations made by the market do not include a buy or sell indicator and therefore we have to derive this information ourselves. The policy we have adopted is based on the mid price of the stock at the time of the declaration. For example, a trade declared at a price that is higher than the mid price at the time of declaration would be put in the buy column, a trade lower than the mid price would be put in the sell column. A trade which matches the mid price would be considered unknown. Please also note that the market can delay declaration of the trades for up to an hour in which case we will not make any assumptions and place that trade in the 'unknown' column. Please also note that many investors are able to buy and sell within the spread and also users of level 2 systems will actually be buying at the perceived sell price, these trades might therefore appear to be wrongly categorised.
MrDavis
- 14 May 2004 15:26
- 225 of 706
Cheers Ian...
apple
- 14 May 2004 15:27
- 226 of 706
Now where have I seen that copy & paste before :-))
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 14 May 2004 15:28
- 227 of 706
Apple,
It is one of my favourites :)
Ian
astonvilla
- 14 May 2004 18:02
- 228 of 706
12 new posts to look at got me a wee bit excited and then I read them :-))
alderleyedge
- 14 May 2004 20:37
- 229 of 706
Kivver
- 16 May 2004 10:45
- 230 of 706
you may as well get rid if it is that inaccurate, just show trades but without buy or sell.
apple
- 18 May 2004 11:10
- 231 of 706
TWO 4 Million trades!
Something happening?
apple
- 18 May 2004 15:03
- 232 of 706
oneill
It was me that was asking.
BTW
Yet another 4 Million trade!
Something must be going on.
janesteve
- 19 May 2004 15:16
- 233 of 706
another 4 million trade again this morning @ 2.41....must be a buy
apple
- 19 May 2004 17:02
- 234 of 706
janesteve
Yep it was a late trade so looking at the price, it was prbably a buy.
I wonder who is making all these 4 million trades.
Maybe an RNS soon if they get enough to notify.
janesteve
- 25 May 2004 10:40
- 235 of 706
has anyone got any thoughts about why this stock is still loosing ground...only last week it anounced an agreement with wanadoo
a3s5m3
- 25 May 2004 12:51
- 236 of 706
you have some negative posters on ADVFN who seem to have a mission to get the price down - not sure why