Shares tip...quite interesting.....graph looks good and a british company as well....in electronics...unusual....

Piss poor management from NANO they should have had a RNS out first thing 7am clearing this matter up and not leaving share holders in limbo.

From over the other side ......................

Here's a bit of comment from Nanoco's brokers (no link - via third party)

Whilst the LG TV sets containing quantum dots produced by Nanoco were presented at the Las Vegas CES show as expected, shares in Nanoco are weaker this morning following a press release from a private US-based company called Nanosys that has announced an agreement with Samsung. Whilst the precise details of the agreement are not outlined in the press release, we understand that the deal is a patent licence only and does not relate to a quantum dot supply agreement – indeed, Nanoco/Dow are the only volume manufacturers of cadmium-free quantum dots in the world – on this basis it seems illogical that Nanosys would be able to supply a company as large as Samsung (with a c. 26% share of the global TV market) with sufficient quantities of cadmium free quantum dots to launch TV sets “in the coming months” (as per this link : http://mashable.com/2015/01/05/samsung-suhd-tvs/). We remain positively inclined on shares in Nanoco and believe that CY2015 (Nanoco has a July year-end) will be a year of transition for the group, with further news flow on new customer product launches, but more importantly, the group receiving its first commercial shipments and royalty payments towards the end of the year. If achieved as expected, the high margin nature of the group’s sales will result in very strong earnings growth, and we would also expect to see a re-rating of the shares as the model is proven.

"indeed, Nanoco/Dow are the only volume manufacturers of cadmium-free quantum dots in the world – on this basis it seems illogical that Nanosys would be able to supply a company as large as Samsung (with a c. 26% share of the global TV market) with sufficient quantities of cadmium free quantum dots to launch TV sets “in the coming months”

Well surely NANO and the Broker should be looking at legal action.

But then we get this from a respected poster on advfn........

smarm 6 Jan'15 - 14:04 - 7272 of 7273 0 1

Cockers - a member of this thread contacted Nanosys and they confirmed they are supplying cad free dots to Samsung. I know the person concerned....and believe 100% that the contact was made. I can't say for sure the info is correct but the balance of probability is that it is. I would therefore suggest caution re saying Nano/Dow only ones capable...........................ends

Still no wiser until NANO management themselves clear this up.

I must be bonkers but added this morning....

There is an expression called 'scale it up' or 'scaled up'.

Nanosys can supply 'the dots' to Samsung (this expression is technically correct) - but it is NOT technically correct enough because volume production is required and I don't think Nanosys have an adequately scaled up capacity for, say running a massive production run of dots (is this how you say it?) for a screen manufacturer.

I think, IYSWIM?

As in, "I can swim.' This does not mean I can swim across the English Channel.

But who am I?

"Is it time to cut and run?

From: http://www.iii.co.uk/articles/215242/nanoco-group-plc-plunges-it-time-cut-and-run

possible multi bagger :) ..... was posted a week ago

i think he meant "possible multi body bagger"

sorry jimmy but irresistible :-)

The volume sale (in the RNS) was a bit of serious profit taking, IMHO.

And why not, eh? Nanoco might well be running out of cash.

cynic i still think it could be , however do i want to take the risk ?

sorry m8 .... it was only a tease as you know
unlike some on this site, i never gloat at peeps who have done their dosh

I can take it , you buy in you take your chance , i'm still in .
Someone over the road has posted an article from Shares Mag this morning (best not post it here) saying like Mike Walters that it's overdone ,i.e nothing has changed .

Except i'm down about "20% :) ...

This drop is just overdone....when peoples senses come round the sp will climb....mindsets are like sheep on the internet finance.....one jumps off a cliff ; they all do...it does not mean that is correct !....this company has a huge lead on all other companies in this field : conclusion : sp will rebound strongly !.

Cant believe none of you havent posted about the News which as been re vamped from yesterday and proves this other lot are NOT supplying Samsung with these C Drops.

What you have to ask though is WHY the Hell didnt NANO Management sort this out before the open yesterday?????????? AND can they be trusted again going forward????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

apologise after people lost thousands of pounds, not good enough!




" we note that Samsung does not and has not used Nanosys products in Samsung’s products. The corrected information is provided below. We apologize for any confusion this mistake may have created.




CORRECTION In its press release dated January 6, 2015, Nanosys conveyed inaccurate information. To clarify the prior inaccurate press release, we note that Samsung does not and has not used Nanosys products in Samsung’s products. The corrected information is provided below. We apologize for any confusion this mistake may have created."

Its at the very top of the text.............

CORRECTION In its press release dated January 6, 2015, Nanosys conveyed inaccurate information. To clarify the prior inaccurate press release, we note that Samsung does not and has not used Nanosys products in Samsung’s products. The corrected information is provided below. We apologize for any confusion this mistake may have created."

http://www.nanosysinc.com/press-releases/

What was the point of yesterdays statement from Nanosys ? And Nano should have reacted to that as soon as ..
Sometimes the market is just too corrupt .

Seems like industrial sabotage to me Jimmy.

A lot of people lost a lot of money.

Someone should be held accountable.

Ive gone back in again but Im sickened with the whole saga.

May I be allowed to suggest, that anyone who felt it necessary to sell and who has made a loss, join with others of a like mind and organise the launch of a 'Class Action' against Nanosys for the issue of a wrongful statement?

Hmmm? Or was it Nanoco? I forget.

Anyway, that should teach them a bl**dy lesson! Agreed?

Of course, if you didn't sell, thereby not crystallising a loss, yo' is allright.

People lost who sold.......... and who held.?????

The issue here is corrupt management in 2 cases.

AIM again.........so no chance of compensation.

You get to be hard with no morals in this business through the actions of the players taking part.

Bloody disgusting.