apple
- 25 Mar 2004 20:47
hlyeo98
- 10 Nov 2004 13:28
- 233 of 1451
has great potential...50p on the cards.
Janus
- 11 Nov 2004 16:31
- 234 of 1451
Janus
- 11 Nov 2004 16:35
- 235 of 1451
From the other place
Martin C-J - 11 Nov'04 - 15:34 - 13770 of 13785
I never usually post a response from an email but this time I will make an exception. I just received this a few seconds ago. I hope Alan Kingsman does not mind:
Dear Martin
Andrew Wood passed your e-mail to me. We have been aware of the information in the GTAC letter for some time. Let me reassure you that the vectors used in the study were not those that we use in the clinical products and in a vast range of animal experiments conducted over many months for our various products we have never seen a single adverse event caused by the vectors let alone any tumour induction.
Yours
Alan Kingsman
publess
- 13 Nov 2004 14:17
- 236 of 1451
Rumours persist from the other place. Might be best to sit on the sidelines until resolved one way or the other - could be a bumpy ride short term. Medium-long term it's a quality company with some great technologies.
daves dazzlers
- 13 Nov 2004 21:23
- 237 of 1451
Still looking at this one,my be in soon.
hlyeo98
- 14 Nov 2004 11:15
- 238 of 1451
buy in on weakness
daves dazzlers
- 14 Nov 2004 12:59
- 239 of 1451
I am thinking along those lines hlyeo98 , but a seem to be buying a lot of longs at the moment ..
eurofox
- 14 Nov 2004 17:52
- 240 of 1451
I spoke to Alan Kingsman by phone and got the same information as Martin. Not only did he confirm the email response above, but mentioned that the "Academic Group" that ran into a problem with its mice were trying to do something quite different and were, in effect, using "problematic mice" to start with
My take on my conversation with Alan Kingsman yesterday, in clarifying the scope of the GTAC notice (see MJC email above also) was that he sounded supremely confident - imo
apple
- 16 Nov 2004 11:36
- 241 of 1451
Oh well, drifting down again.
I'm waiting for 16p to buy some more.
DSTOREY9916
- 16 Nov 2004 13:35
- 242 of 1451
Let the guys behind the scenes get on with it, sp will eventually reflect their work and achievements.
daves dazzlers
- 16 Nov 2004 13:48
- 243 of 1451
16 you say apple , now that would be nice ..
apple
- 18 Nov 2004 10:13
- 244 of 1451
Now at 18p
accord
- 18 Nov 2004 17:27
- 245 of 1451
Looking at the one year graph above, is there any analysts out there who can explain this one. As this is a high risk stock, is this why no pattern has emerged.
apple
- 22 Nov 2004 12:02
- 246 of 1451
Down another 5.5%
Still hoping for 16p to buy some more.
accord
- 30 Nov 2004 14:12
- 247 of 1451
what is going on ???? we need some good news please
apple
- 30 Nov 2004 16:16
- 248 of 1451
It will come eventually but I hope we reach 16p first.
accord
- 01 Dec 2004 07:51
- 249 of 1451
why is the 16p mark so magical???
robstuff
- 01 Dec 2004 10:21
- 250 of 1451
Because it's just about as low at it could get before a big upswing. I have been trading this co for yrs and the patterns are easily assessed. We are at that time now I believe before some more newsflow and a price hike so if you haven't got onboard, nows a good time. This is very very good value - soon this co will be re-rated around the 50p level and the potential is enormous. My best Bio! A cure for cancer is not long away i'm hoping, i'm actually very confident that OXB is the next Glaxo.
accord
- 01 Dec 2004 16:47
- 251 of 1451
robstuff wrote: i'm actually very confident that OXB is the next Glaxo.
Hey easy on, thats a pretty strong statement but I like your style.
I bought at 18.5p back in oct 04 but may dabble again at the magical 16p mark.
Come on OXB bring us some festive cheer.
moneyplus
- 02 Dec 2004 02:05
- 252 of 1451
I bet Glaxo didn't keep it's holders waiting this long!!