markymar
- 15 Aug 2005 15:14
http://www.falklands-oil.com/
http://www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk
http://www.argosresources.com/


Rockhopper was established in 2004 with a strategy to invest in and undertake an offshore oil exploration programme in the North Falkland Basin. It was floated on AIM in August 2005. Rockhopper was the first company to make a commercial oil discovery in the Falklands. Today Rockhopper is the largest acreage holder in the North Falkland Basin, with interests in the Greater Mediterranean region.
required field
- 19 Aug 2010 09:04
- 2397 of 6294
Going long on this......hope that there are no problems with the testing because the name will change otherwise to : "Rockflopper" !
HARRYCAT
- 19 Aug 2010 13:49
- 2398 of 6294
Nice recovery from the disappointing news. Happy to continue holding, though buying at 275 would have been nice. Even at 308p surely it's worth having prior to sealion testing? Not sure this result bodes well for Jacinta & Alpha though
aldwickk
- 19 Aug 2010 15:34
- 2400 of 6294
I sold a few at 336p to lock in profit then bought a few at 180 on the dip, but glad i didn't sell any more this week.
aldwickk
- 19 Aug 2010 17:45
- 2402 of 6294
Your wrong Markymar , look at the chart it dipped below 180p on 2/6/2010
Proselenes
- 19 Aug 2010 17:56
- 2403 of 6294
The main thing to concentrate on with the flow tests is in fact :
THE RECOVERY RATE !!!
242M is based on a 30% recovery rate.
If that recovery rate were to be increased after flow tests to 40% then you would see a big increase in the 242M recoverable barrels, and therefore the share price target.
aldwickk
- 19 Aug 2010 18:02
- 2404 of 6294
delete
gildph
- 20 Aug 2010 09:44
- 2405 of 6294
If the recovery rate is increased to 40% and there is no updgrade for underlying quantity are you saying the 242 estimate increases to c323 and your 7.50 has a similair increase (i.e. +33% to 10)?
Proselenes
- 20 Aug 2010 11:06
- 2406 of 6294
I think I shall do an all in one post so anyone can keep on cut and pasting it, as the questions seem to keep being repeated.
Rockhopper
FLOW TESTS are expected to take 45 days.
The 45 days is due to the tests being extensive. Each of the two zones to be tested will be tested twice. 1st zone tested, then 2nd zone tested, then 1st again, then 2nd again.
This will give them strong data with which they can make further assessments and calculations with regard to the Sea Lion prospect.
The main thing with the flow tests is not the flow rate, its more of the calculations into the "RECOVERY FACTOR".
The present 242M barrels is based on a 30% recovery factor. The upside or downside from the flow test results will be to do with the calculation of the actual recovery factor.
242M barrels recoverable based on 30% = circa 720p a share in the ground basis.
If the recovery factor is lower, say 20% then the recoverable barrels falls to 161M barrels and its value therefore is 480p a share on an in the ground basis.
If the recovery factor is higher, say 40%, then the recoverable barrels rises from 242M to 322M.
322M is worth circa 958p a share on an in the ground basis.
So this is where there is downside and upside from the flow test results. However, all being well, even if the recovery factor is lowered down, the resultant in the ground basis for the share price is still well in advance of the current share price, which is why the share price remains strong even with Ernest failure.
Feel free to copy and paste as needed in future.
greekman
- 20 Aug 2010 11:23
- 2407 of 6294
Proselenes,
Good post.
gildph
- 20 Aug 2010 11:32
- 2408 of 6294
Thanks for the clarification Proselenes, much appreciated!
cynic
- 20 Aug 2010 11:46
- 2409 of 6294
thanks prossy - very helpful indeed ... it follows that flowtest results won't be announced until very end september or even a little later
cynic
- 20 Aug 2010 12:17
- 2411 of 6294
you can sort out a nubile masseuse for me at the end of each day's cycling instead! ..... it's not that the massage will be needed, but the excuse will suffice - Beloved says i have her blessing!
mad hatter
- 20 Aug 2010 12:48
- 2412 of 6294
Proselenes
Thanks for the explanation of the relationship between the recovery factor and the shareprice.
What I do not understand is how the shareprice itself is arrived at - I assume you are basing this on a comparason of the recovery factor and estimated total volume of the well with figures from other oil companies, but what are the relevant factors - the "formula" behind the valuation?
Perhaps you can expand on this point ?
Thanks,
cynic
- 20 Aug 2010 12:55
- 2413 of 6294
try supply and demand in the market!
it is that at the end of the day that will determine same, though there is very occasionally some logic
required field
- 20 Aug 2010 13:14
- 2414 of 6294
I bet that half way through the testing that some update of a kind will come out....mid october seems too far away...
cynic
- 20 Aug 2010 13:15
- 2415 of 6294
don't agree .... i think RKH have a pretty effective lockdown in place
required field
- 20 Aug 2010 13:18
- 2416 of 6294
What ?...no info until october 15th or so.....not sure about that....they could say such and such a flow with more to come from more testing....remember...they like giving out rns's on consecutive days....