With video search set to be the next big growth area BLNX have the software the likes of Microsoft, Google and NewsCorp would love to have.

In fact BLNX have done deals with most of these, the most recent being the UtargetFox deal which has been reported in the USA but not RNS'd in the UK.

Alexa rankings confirm the continued growth in usage as its viral effect spreads:-

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/blinkx.com

The ITN RNS confirms blnx is the best in the market and is growing fast:-

Leading News Organization ITN Extends Advertising Deal with blinkx Based on Proven Campaign Success




blinkx Selected to Power Advertising across ITN Website and Syndication Partner Sites




SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. - July 2, 2008 - blinkx, the world's largest and most advanced video search engine, today announced that it has won an extension contract that will augment the scope of its advertising partnership with ITN, one of the world's leading news and multimedia content companies. Under the terms of the new agreement, ITN will use AdHoc, blinkx's patented contextual advertising platform for online TV and video, to serve advertisements on the ITN website and its syndication partner sites, including Bebo.




Through AdHoc, ITN has already been effectively monetizing its premium news content on the blinkx.com network for over six months. During this time, ITN achieved a significantly better return, greater search volume, and higher monetization through blinkx than through other syndication partners.




AdHoc uses blinkx's patented speech-to-text transcription and visual analysis technology to understand video content more thoroughly and effectively than any other service today, and can therefore dynamically place the most pertinent advertising against it. The AdHoc platform offers media companies and advertisers a unique value proposition -- video advertising which combines the emotive power of TV promotion, with the relevance and utility of contextual search advertising.




The confluence of ITN's premium TV content, blinkx's extensive syndication network, and AdHoc's uniquely powerful targeting capabilities was a formula for success. By extending its partnership with blinkx, ITN aims to achieve similar returns by leveraging the AdHoc platform to deliver contextually relevant video advertising on its own website and across its distribution partner sites.




'We're thrilled to be broadening our relationship with ITN,' said Suranga Chandratillake, founder and CEO of blinkx. 'News content is one of the most popular categories of online video and there's clearly a tremendous opportunity for monetization. The success of our partnership with ITN is evidence that the blinkx AdHoc platform is a uniquely powerful solution for online video advertising today.'




'We've been delighted with the results of our partnership with blinkx and are looking forward to implementing the AdHoc technology on our site,' said Nicholas Wheeler, managing director, ITN On. 'blinkx AdHoc has proven that it can achieve significant monetization of our content, effective marketing for advertisers and, most importantly, a useful, non-disruptive experience for our audience.'




As a pioneer in video search technology, blinkx has built a reputation as the most effective way to search new forms of online content such as video. With more than 350 partners and 26 million hours of indexed video and audio content, including favorite TV moments, news clips, short documentaries, music videos, video blogs and more, blinkx uses advanced speech recognition technology to deliver results that are more accurate and reliable than standard metadata-based keyword searches.

i'm not entirely convinced by these so-called "closing prices" ..... the test comes shortly after opening the following day

Quite agree CynicI was just interested if Gausie had been trumpedhow close he isand what he thinks will happen tomorrow?he is a very clever trader you know!

tabby
Then why does the written Parliamentary answer say

"6. Bets laid off by outside bookmakers for inclusion in the pool were placed with Tote Credit Limited"

Note outside bookmakers.

You are clearly blind to logic and proof.

Bullseye - go back to the gaza thread and answer the question asked and not the one you would have liked to be asked

And Tote Credit Limited are Bookmakers.Bookmakers to Bookmakersnot Bookmakers to Tote Pool get it?
3. The procedure for transmitting to the relevant pool bets laid off by Tote Credit Limited, one of the Tote's bookmaking subsidiary companies
You are clearly blind to logic and proof...now go away!

The article says 'outside bookmakers'. Tote Investors, which became Tote Credit is not outside and they would have no need to lay off bets as they are part of the pool. They have no odds based liability.

Intererstingly they can sue for gambling debts as the bet is a purchase of a share of the pool. In my day gambling debts were 'debts in honour' only and you could not be sued.

Haystackyou are the biggest wind-up known to manparagraph 3 clearly states Tote Credit Limited are one of Tote's bookmaking subsidiary companiesparagraph 6 clearly states Bets laid off by outside bookmakers for inclusion in the pool were placed with Tote Credit Limitedoutside Bookmakers were laying off with Tote Credit {bookmakers] at an agreed price not tote return!...Bookmaker to Bookmaker...at no time does the stone age article say outside Bookmakers laid their bets directly with the tote pool...

3. The procedure for transmitting to the relevant pool bets laid off by Tote Credit Limited, one of the Tote's bookmaking subsidiary companies

6. Bets laid off by outside bookmakers for inclusion in the pool were placed with Tote Credit Limited as agent for the Tote for onward transmission to the course after the result of the race

Bookmaker to Tote Credit {bookmakers] to Tote pool [Totaliser]

Can anyone else understand this?

Yes. yehy own them, hence NOT an outside company.

"outside bookmakers for inclusion in the pool were placed with Tote Credit Limited"

So the lay off bets were placed by outside bookmakers WITH Totte Credit Ltd. That means it can't be Tote Credit doing the lay offs as the outside bookmakers are doing it with them. That means the outside bookmakers are laying off on the Tote. It has to be done via Tote Credit as the bookmakers would be doing it on credit and cash at the track.

Haystackyou keep saying the same thing total bo**ocksgo and speak to Paddy PowerLadbrokesBarry Dennisor whoever you like Ill leave it for others to understandend of! why am I not surprised you have had many jobs and you have ended up with thislol still blnx are worthless 0pyou are always right on the Gaza threadGausie is your love childand Hilary is your Fairy Godmother.now go and answer Cynic

This cant do any harmSamsung Galaxy Tab is official, debuts on September 2nd
Samsung is gearing up to debut their first Android tablet, the Galaxy Tab, at next weeks IFA show in Berin

Maybe if I go through it slowly, you might get it.

"outside bookmakers for inclusion in the pool were placed with Tote Credit Limited"

"outside bookmakers placed withTote Credit Ltd"

Tote Credit can't be both side of the transactions, therefore the outside bookmakers are NOT Tote Credit Ltd. That means the bets are laid off by the outside bookmakers with Tote Credit and Tote Credit add them into the pool.

The Samsung Tab is not important for Blinkx any more than the Galaxy S was. Samsung devices run on Android and therefore have access to the complete Android Apps library. There are plenty of video search apps available already. Another non event.

Talk about dog with a bone.

Haystack - Just curious, if you are neither a buyer or a seller of this stock, what exactly are you trying to prove and why. What is the point?

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/240044-39-blinkx-beat-uninstall

CC.

This is what haystack does and has done for as long as i remember, when he had
a real vendetta against me on advfn all those years ago he would deramp every
stock i held and i held a few, it was the same old crap back then, he is a typical
internet know all that will stay up all night to prove a point on these sites.

Ok ravey.

Haystack - ?

rdg
You only used to post on a couple of threads. So give me a list of all these stocks of yours that I posted on. At least you have modified the comment from the last time you posted it. Last time it was "on all my threads' as though they were yours. You in fact onlt started one thread on ADVFN.

I see you are still using the same same old exaggeration that you use to ramp your stocks.

Remind me, weren't you banned from this BB for abuse?

So what is the answer to CC's question?

Haystack.

Seriously aint it time you moved on, i'm here strickly to try and make my living
trading shares, you seem to be here as a hobby to annoy others.

We can go back in the past but what is the point of a argument with you, you
are never wrong and you always twist the subject, it's getting soooooooo boring
now !