Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Empyrean Energy (EME) (EME)     

PapalPower - 21 Nov 2005 08:12

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EME&Size=big.chart?symb=uk%3Aeme&compidx=aaaaa%3AEmpyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

Strawbs - 28 Jul 2006 16:24 - 278 of 2087

I think a number of people have been badly burned in VOG, EME and MRP, to name but a few. If nothing else, prices will probably fall further, as some decide that "enough is enough". Some may even decide to take profits in other stocks too, rather than risk a shock down the line.

DOW reaction was interesting. The inflation figure seems to have been largely ignored, in favour of believing the economy will just cool. A bad move I suspect. But hey, what do I know.....

As ever.....just my opinion.

Strawbs.

Haystack - 28 Jul 2006 16:24 - 279 of 2087

VOG raised 13 last year from a new share issue and it was quite dilutionary (16% of the enlarged share base). The shares issued to takeover targets are just a way of paying for the company with paper instead of cash. They were able to do that because at the time their share price was quite high.

In fact they spent about 10m in six months up to November, so how long will the 13m last. Their net assets are made up almost entirely of Intangible Assets. It looks as bad as EME to me.

seawallwalker - 28 Jul 2006 16:32 - 280 of 2087

VOG raised 13 last year from a new share issue. The shares issued to takeover targets are just a way of paying for the company with paper instead of cash. They were able to do that because at the time their share price was quite high.

In fact they spent about 10........................


I hope it was on a nice vintage..........lol

Haystack - 28 Jul 2006 16:34 - 281 of 2087

I suppose that based on the above calculation, VOG may soon be out of cash again.

cynic - 28 Jul 2006 16:36 - 282 of 2087

Haystack ..... paper instead of cash is far better for the shareholders and the company, as the fall in price now demonstrates.

Strawbs ..... Dow has also ignored the psychological blow that UN are pulling out their unarmed observers for Lebanon ...... One can rationalise today that the market had already discounted continuing hostilities, but if it falls tomorrow, then it will be a natural reaction to the bad news!

Haystack - 28 Jul 2006 16:52 - 283 of 2087

Paper is only possible if the share price is sufficiently buoyant to convince the takeover target. Now that VOG price has dropped paper will be much more difficult. The takeover targets have had a poor deal by taking paper as the share price has tanked.

In the long term cash is the same as paper for the shareholders as the dilution is the same. It takes the same number of new shares to be issued to arrive at the same amount of money. The only benefit of paper is that it doesn't require another share offer, so the expenses should be less and it doesn't tax the pacience of either the institutions or shareholders in asking yet again for money.

cynic - 28 Jul 2006 16:57 - 284 of 2087

I only agree that VOG may find paper in lieu of cash more difficult to sell in the future, but it was a very very cheap way of doing deals in the past ...... on today's price a 10m deal 3 months ago will now have been done for the equivalent of 3.5m ...... or am I thick as well as cynical?

Haystack - 28 Jul 2006 17:03 - 285 of 2087

No. The cost is the same in terms of shares issued as they were issued at the time. The target company would have wanted 10m, so 10m of shares were issued causing whatever dilution.

If it had been a new share issue to the market to raise 10m then it would have been the same number of shares issued and the cash raised would been given to the target company. The shareholders are in the same position either way.

The only loser is the target company shareholders who now have a diminishing asset (VOG shares).

Haystack - 28 Jul 2006 17:06 - 286 of 2087

Buying a company with paper is easier as a prospectus does not have to be issued for the new shares and the expenses of underwriting/legal would be less. The issue would be coverered by the usual AGM resolutions that permit companies to issue a certain number of shares without recourse to the shareholders for an EGM vote.

shadow - 29 Jul 2006 12:02 - 287 of 2087

eme had a similar effect to Northern petroleum , last year this went down from a sp of 100p to 35p, but picked up to a new high of about 175p high but now levelled of. slightly. therefore eme will pick up again soon news is bound to stimulate the market. As Eagle 1 north is expected to flow 1000bopd +. Not to mention Sugarloaf is about to be spudded. So relax and wait a while good prospects are imminient.

cynic - 29 Jul 2006 18:17 - 288 of 2087

Shadow .... you hope! I think Eagle 1 will prove a disappointment though Sugarloaf in due course may come to EME's rescue

2517GEORGE - 29 Jul 2006 19:01 - 289 of 2087

Haystacks, it's not just the target company shareholders that are the losers, the incumbent shareholders are also losers because whilst issuing 10m of shares for 10m of assets is ok, if those assets end up being worth less than the value of issued shares (ie 10m ) then ALL shareholders are losers. Just look at VOD for example.
2517

Big Al - 31 Jul 2006 09:35 - 290 of 2087

It's what these outfits don't say in a news release that always matters most, I find. Read between the lines!!!

;-))

Big Al - 31 Jul 2006 21:23 - 291 of 2087

I'd be interested in knowing who stopped out and who didn't - reasons why and why not would also be interesting.

What makes you money in the markets is not entires, it is exits, i.e. cashing in.




WHO DID WHAT?

;-0

cynic - 31 Jul 2006 21:42 - 292 of 2087

I got out, through gritted teeth, at just over 50p ...... As I have recently posted, I think this company is now a busted flush, much as it grieves me having supported it with hard cash over the last year or so.

Big Al - 31 Jul 2006 21:52 - 293 of 2087

cynic - the whole point about entering the market is that we have 3 potential opinions - good, bad, indifferent.

We must all have an exit before we have an entry.


Preserve your capital

cynic - 31 Jul 2006 22:08 - 294 of 2087

that is why i got out ..... am now waiting for Dow to reach 11250 and will then think of shorting

new boy - 10 Aug 2006 11:51 - 295 of 2087

Surely this is a buy at 33p possible news on Eagle shortly, possible 1000bpd and develpment on sugar loaf.

With a small market cap and few shares in circulation this could be a winner at this low price.

opinions would be appreatied.

new boy - 10 Aug 2006 11:51 - 296 of 2087

Surely this is a buy at 33p possible news on Eagle shortly, possible 1000bpd and develpment on sugar loaf.

With a small market cap and few shares in circulation this could be a winner at this low price.

opinions would be appreatied.

new boy - 10 Aug 2006 11:51 - 297 of 2087

Surely this is a buy at 33p possible news on Eagle shortly, possible 1000bpd and develpment on sugar loaf.

With a small market cap and few shares in circulation this could be a winner at this low price.

opinions would be appreatied.
Register now or login to post to this thread.