soul traders
- 15 Dec 2006 15:35
Just quick summary to bring this to your attention; more detail will hopefully follow.
This stock floated yesterday at 10p and has since doubled. It has, needless to say, suddenly become very popular on another BB.
The company is profitable already and trading on an estimated (by yours truly) forward PE for the current year of 9 at SP 20p. EDIT: Hoodless Brennan estimate EPS for Full Year 2006 will be 2.18p - see article (link below).
Free float is 11.4% of the 81.2 million shares in issue - most are held by the directors.
Extremely useful Investegate article
LINK
Extremely useful Hoodless Brennan analysis
LINK
PDYOR, etc.
PapalPower
- 07 Jul 2008 09:57
- 280 of 369
The TAIH rampers running for the hills now ??????? ;) LOL
oilyrag
- 07 Jul 2008 10:10
- 281 of 369
Hardly PP, real holders still there and not budging. Spread bets and roll overs maybe, or chancers who cant afford to invest with spare money being forced out. Their own fault, if they cant wait as long as it takes. You must be getting desperate the ammount of de ramping on a stock you reckon you no longer hold. Personnally, I wouldn't waste my time on something that I didn't hold or wasnt looking to hold. You either have a hidden agenda or nothing else to do.
cynic
- 07 Jul 2008 10:14
- 282 of 369
sorry oily, but i don't agree ..... i take an active interest in all sorts of stocks that i don't hold and for all sorts of reasons
in this particular instance, i side with PP insofar as i have never liked either the stock or its chinese parentage, and have posted as such in late july last year when sp was 20s and been duly pilloried
tangle
- 10 Jul 2008 21:11
- 283 of 369
Link to Annual Results PDF that contains more info than Results RNS :-
Taihua AR 2007 PDF
PapalPower
- 30 Jul 2008 09:13
- 284 of 369
Whoops... !!!
Taihua plc
("Taihua" or the "Company")
Annual General Meeting Statement
At the Annual General Meeting of the Company, to be held at 9.00am (UK time) today, the Chairman, Richard Tanner, will make the following statement:
Following on from my report in the annual report and accounts, in respect of the twelve months to 31 December 2007, I am pleased to provide shareholders with an update.
In the six months to 30 June 2008, sales volumes of both Paclitaxel and Homoharringtonine are ahead of last year. However, adverse exchange rate fluctuations between the Renminbi and the US dollar have impacted upon the value of sales.
Although new Traditional Chinese Medicines ("TCMs") are ready for introduction into the market all TCM licences issued to Chinese companies since 2005 are under review. This lead to a suspension of production.
As mentioned in the annual report and accounts, we have submitted application to the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines for a certificate of suitability for paclitaxel, through our regulatory agents Beijing Canny. We are still awaiting their feedback which is expected before the end of the year.
Finally, I can confirm that the Company has commenced the process of seeking regulatory approval for the payment of the dividend and a further update will be provided in due course.
PapalPower
- 30 Jul 2008 09:24
- 285 of 369
Funny really, now if any of the rampers had bothered to check, they can quite easily see that Chinese exports (on lots of goods) are done in US$ but the US$ rates have not been corrected for the strength of the RMB.
So they are all still selling at 2007 US$ prices - say 100K US$ for "x".
But that was based on the RMB conversion of an RMB price into US$ in 2007. Prices remain static - RMB appreciates - sales levels in RMB go down the pan, along with margins.
And thats today's lesson in the perils of Chinese companies........ :)
Expect lots more margin erosion at the next results.........as I kept on about :)
PapalPower
- 30 Jul 2008 10:57
- 286 of 369
All production is halted it seems :
Although new Traditional Chinese Medicines ("TCMs") are ready for introduction into the market all TCM licences issued to Chinese companies since 2005 are under review. This lead to a suspension of production.
cynic
- 30 Jul 2008 11:01
- 287 of 369
sorry to see old pal oily getting whacked on this share, but i see neither dynamix nor kate barnes telling me that my warning a year ago was right and they were wrong .... why would that be do you think?
PapalPower
- 30 Jul 2008 12:33
- 288 of 369
More trouble ahead for Canada.........door shutting there ? Will North America all be the same ahead......... ?
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2008/07/18/bc-tradition-chinese-medicine-regulation.html
Traditional Chinese doctors fight federal regulation under Bill C-51
Last Updated: Friday, July 18, 2008
Doctors of Chinese medicine across Canada have joined forces to fight the federal government's controversial Bill C-51 a proposed law that critics say will make many natural health products unavailable, including Chinese herbs.
If approved, the federal bill would treat natural health products like herbs, vitamins and minerals as drugs, making it harder to import, sell or dispense them.
Doctors of traditional Chinese medicine, or TCM, say their herbs would have to pass Western-style clinical trials under Bill C-51.
Dr. Henry Lu, who runs the International College of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Vancouver, said that's like saying, 'You can speak Chinese but use English grammar.'
"You should allow TCM practitioners to practise the way they have been practising," Lu said.
Peter Wood, who heads the TCM Association of B.C., said the bill would hobble Chinese medicine, and be a giant step backward.
"It's basically taking choice away from Canadians on which model of medicine they'd like to use," Wood said.
Five-thousand years of history has already proven TCM is safe, he said.
"I don't know of any cases of anything going awry. And if there are, there are far fewer than there are deaths that happen from pharmaceutical drugs," Wood added.
Bill C-51 draws national opposition
Those opposed to Bill C-51 are hoping to rally public support to quash the bill before it becomes law, which is expected to happen in the fall. Websites and online groups have sprung up across the country imploring people to lobby their MPs to halt progress of the bill.
Critics believe Bill C-51 will outlaw up to 60 per cent of natural health products currently sold in Canada, and penalize parents who give herbs or supplements to their children.
They also argue that the government could designate any natural health product a prescription drug, making it available by prescription only, forcing smaller companies out of the market.
Many natural health product retailers and holistic health practitioners maintain major drug companies lobbied for the bill, but the government has maintained it's about safety.
Federal Health Minister Tony Clement has defended the bill, saying that it will allow the federal government to continuously monitor the safety of products even after they have been approved.
Clement's office says the government will be proposing amendments to the bill if it passes second reading and goes on to the committee stage in the fall. If the amendments are adopted, natural health products would be defined within the legislation as a unique category apart from food and drugs.
Another proposed amendment would ensure that regulations specific to the approval of natural health products recognize the value of traditional knowledge and history of use in assessing benefits and risks, as is already the case.
PapalPower
- 30 Jul 2008 12:37
- 289 of 369
Here is the White Paper, issued by the government on the 18th July, which has forced many to suspend production of TCM's as they are not compliant with the regulations.
http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/cmsweb/webportal/W43879541/A64028182.html
.
paul56
- 30 Jul 2008 22:06
- 290 of 369
As quite a few posters have stated on advfn that you are a extreme danger
to even yourself PapelPower when it comes to posting misleading information.
Quite a few people who have attended todays Agm have posted on the thread
and one thing they all agree on is your attempts to distort the truth.
http://www.advfn.com/cmn/fbb/thread.php3?id=15076803
PapalPower
- 31 Jul 2008 01:17
- 291 of 369
TFNF headline says it all :
30/07/08 08:32 TFNF Taihua says H1 Paclitaxel, Homoharringtonine sales ahead but value hit by forex
They are getting hit by RMB appreciation, and are unable to increase their US$ prices for exports. As was seen at last results, with the increases in overheads margins are falling.
This will accelerate the margins in falling, along with of course higher overheads yet again. Margins could be falling for some time.
They do not appear to have the cash for their planned expansion, and so is their going to be the use of debt ? or more equity issued ?
63.1m RMB budget generally means in China completion for about 80m RMB, so they are going to be short of around nearly 2m pounds after all their cash is used up, so they will go from being in the cash to being in debt.
Understand the move, they will need to protect margins going forward, and so the new plants are part of a plan to achieve this.
And then of course all the problems with PR........
PapalPower
- 31 Jul 2008 08:11
- 292 of 369
If you want to make a summary you could as follows :
Overall margins were falling at the last results due to increased costs.
Costs are going to continue to increase, through wages rise pressure in China, increasing energy costs in China, increasing transportation costs.
Sales pricing levels are somewhat fixed in US$ terms (as from the AGM statement), which means on top of the rising costs and falling overall business margins, means actual margins on the products is going to fall too due to selling in US$ and not be able to account for the strength of the RMB against those set US$ prices, increasing pressure on the overall margins and making them fall more.
Problems with TCM's in China meaning production and/or marketing of certain types is "suspended" pending review.
Problems in Canada with stricter proposed government controls of TCM's, which may spread.
They are going to spend all their cash on new production facilities and likely go into debt to fund completion.
If and when they get EU/US approval they then still have to break into those markets against the already in place suppliers - that will mean much more marketing spend, likely lower margins, lots of up front costs, which may or may not translate into increased revenues 6 to 12 months after the attempt to break into the market.
One could therefore say, there is now lots of uncertainty ahead for TAIH, a potentially difficult phase is coming, and its likely why many people have been selling out.
All IMO, DYOR !!
tangle
- 20 Aug 2008 11:21
- 293 of 369
Copy of a post by JTCod from the dark side..
JTCod - 20 Aug'08 - 10:34 - 5899 of 5901
Here's an interesting exercise and one where you can play around with the figures to suit your own assumtions.
Estimate for 2012:
Take EPS 3p based upon current exchange rate for 2007.
Split the 2007 revenue into 3 products (Pac, HH, TCM's) as per 2007 accounts to estimate the balance of profit for each product.
Revenue
47% HH
33% Paclitaxel
20% TCM’s
Then adjust TCM portion of profits up by +25% to accomodate superior margins and deduct from the other 2.
Should give Profits as a proportion of the 3p IRO:
44% HH,
31% Paclitaxel,
25% TCM's
Now you can project each one seperately:
HH
Until further approval's are granted on this drug in the US and EU allowing use for less chronic sufferers of leukemia, the management seem to be of the opinion that growing HH revenues will be easier if they deliver an injectable product. This seems a good strategy to me as even if the demand were there, not much more than 20kg could be produced pa even with a harvest of the whole region right now. If demand were increased, prices could rise quite rapidly. Though this is a double edged sword because suppliers of harvest would demand their share I am sure and of course have a captive market.
Injectable prices are something like 10x raw ingredient prices. So assuming 20kg ceiling (perhaps with the help of our own nursery in 5 years time) and delivered in injectable form, that should deliver something like 10x the raw ingrediant price. For prudence lets allow just 5x:
2007 profit 3p x 44% for 12kg + 66% to 20kg x 5 for injectable (discounted by 50%) = 11p (excluding any allowance for upward pressure on prices).
Paclitaxel:
This one is where the real action should happen because we are already well down the line with the EU application and the US should follow shortly after.
Paclitaxel sales are showing solid growth YOY and the company are yet to see the benfit from Korea, EU and US (approvals notwithstanding). If EU approval is forthcoming, I would expect the company to announce a plan to expand Paclitaxel production (already mentioned at in previous statements) by at least 3-400% (approx. 60-80kg pa). The reason being, we already have 50kg pa comfortable capacity (55-60kg at a pinch) so if they are proposing expansion at this stage when we only produce 20kg logic would say it must be beyond current capacity. The EU is a very large mature market after all. For these purposes though, lets assume the lower of those 2 figures.
Injectable prices are currently between 8-12x raw ingrediant prices. For prudence though, I have again allowed a 50% discount at just 5x the raw ingredient price we currently receive:
3p x 31% x 4 = 3.72p x 5 for injectables = 18.6p
TCM's
Grew 400% in 2005, 100% in 2006 and 29.6% in 2007.
Clearly this year has been disrupted and until we receive further guidance I wouldn't assume more than 10% growth this year for safety. However, with the Chinese government culling producers of TCM's across the country, I would anticipate upward pressure on growth and pricing for Taihua from 2009. Especially as the management have been so pro-active on developing large numbers of links with hospitals and clinics. Growth of TCM volume alone in China has been double figures over recent years without gaining market share and on top of this Taihua have launched new products and plan more over time. So for the following 4 years lets go with 25% annual growth. I don't think this assumption is beyond Taih. In all probability I think it could be too low.
With 25% of earnings in 2007, 3p (at current exchange rate) x 25% = 0.75p + 10% for 2008 + 25% for 2009/10/11/12 = 2p on a 5 year plan.
TOTAL: 31p
This would be equivalent to almost 1000% growth over 5 years. Which sounds fanciful until you check back and see Taihua have already achieved 1000% over the last 4 years.
My current 5yr earnings target is 25p though, as I have allowed for some dilution and + a little to cover unforeseen costs. I feel comfortable with that having already taken a hatchet to assumed injectable prices 5 years out. On top of that, I have made no allowance for the geared factor of revenue growth over that of fixed overheads. I could possibly be substantially out on the downside in this respect.
25p EPS would equate to 50% compound growth going forward and set that against a PE of less than 4x earnings right now, it would seem an attractive proposition.
25P on a PE of 12 would deliver a 26 bagger. (On 15x a 34 bagger)
Other possible value added opportunities:
One avenue open to Taihua once they establish an injectables plant should be 'outsourcing'. This could become a whole new earnings driver imo, whilst at the same time delivering economies of scale for Taihua's own injectable production. The overheads are so low in this company and their area in general that any big pharma looking to sell their own drugs into China would surely be tempted by such a proposition. Food for thought at least right now.
For Taih the above 5 year 'back of a fag packet' estimate is just a plan waiting to be put in motion imo. Though the injectables could be done anyway, the trigger should be when gain approval of the EU application. That's assuming they do gain approval which is of course not guaranteed.
Possibly some exciting times ahead though I think.
As ever all IMHO and of course DYOR
oilyrag
- 20 Aug 2008 13:01
- 294 of 369
Dont forget to mention the dividend.
PapalPower
- 30 Sep 2008 05:16
- 295 of 369
Nice to see this pile of **** exactly where it should be.
In case anyone wondered I have been enjoying a superb holiday and have been away from the net a lot, apart from the occasional post on III.
I refuse now to post on A DVFN, its has got terrible in terms of abusive rampers this year, totally pathetic and not worth anything now. The good thing is of course they are all now losing money, and I really hope some of those abusive idiots lose everything in the ongoing crash.
Some of us did warn back in January that it was best to sell anything and everything, and we were ridiculed by the abusive rampers, and now it comes to pass...........LOL :)
With what is going on, you can be sure that Asia will be into severe problems come 2nd half 2009, going into 2010.............not a time to be loaded up with "China" exposure stocks..........now people can see why everyone has been selling these "bargains" and not buying them.
The ultimate sign was China dropping interest rates, in the face of inflation, that was a real admission that they are now heading into severe problems :) ho ho ho.
PapalPower
- 14 Oct 2008 01:12
- 296 of 369
Lots of Chinese Stock (rampers) trapped into this one I am told from all the postings there on the dark side (AFN BB's which are now ramper infested).
Does not look very interesting, margins falling, committed to expansion with falling margins, poor PR.
Tiddler, Chinese, Illiquid, Big Spread, AIM etc..
This one is about as unattractive as a normal stock could be made to look. Certainly not an investment, there are so many much better companies around, loads of this.
PapalPower
- 14 Oct 2008 01:39
- 297 of 369
On top of the GNG admission that things are slowing down, today also saw ZTC (Chinese telecoms) say this which again is more evidence to say that things in China are under pressure, and those who said 2009 would be a bad year for anything China related, might well be proven correct :
"As has been widely reported, trading and credit conditions for SME's in the PRC have become increasingly difficult throughout the third quarter of 2008. This is due to deteriorating macro economic conditions outside the PRC and slowing economic growth and restrictive credit policies in China. As a consequence, our markets have become increasingly competitive, disruptive and oversupplied. ZTC has therefore achieved sales significantly below those seen in the same period last year.
As a consequence, the Company's working capital available to operate and expand its business has become constrained, as has been previously announced. The Company continues to review all aspects of its operations to reduce costs and improve efficiencies to improve the availability of working capital for new model and market development. The possible sale of assets referred to above is one example of a potential method of cash generation that is being actively considered."
Proselenes
- 30 Oct 2008 00:38
- 298 of 369
From the recent TAIH update :
30th Sept 2008
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200809301317376908E
"That production gap, combined with the effects of a strengthening Renminbi exchange rate on export sales, meant that although our sales of the anti-cancer active pharmaceutical ingredients, Paclitaxel and Homoharringtonine, remained strong, revenues for the half slipped by 11% to RMB 29.8 million, pulling pre-tax profits back to RMB 14.6 million from RMB 18.1 million for the same period a year earlier."
Those currency issues will be even worse now, look at the Chinese Yuan exchange rate since that update - how badly are export sales falling off now ?
The old saying, it can take years to gain a customer, and only seconds to lose one. How many are TAIH losing due to the currency issues ?
Proselenes
- 18 Feb 2009 12:28
- 299 of 369
Bad update out.
I did warn and warn again over at AFN in the past that things were going to be bad, and currency movements will hurt sales for TAIH, but they were all abusive to me.
Now who has the last laugh..........serves them right.