ainsoph
- 10 Feb 2003 09:04
I have been in and out of these a few times :-)) ..... bumping around their bottom but starting to bounce a little ..... closed @ 87/90p on Friday.
They have fallen from grace because of poor distribution probelens caused by poor management and an out of House warehousing system. THis is being sorted and new guys have replaced the old .....
Great brand name and selling could be overdone ..... anyway I am in for a few @ 90p and will let them ride for a while - not a t trade. Recent director buying around this price
ains
bought @ 90p - currently moving up at 141/145p 13/05 = plus 56.66% net
tomasz
- 20 Jan 2014 09:59
- 296 of 454
And this is great point why there will be no sense to post anymore for me. Moron you got saved your money thanks to wash and rinse clue, otherwise your brain would keep your 150 or so target..lol
--
End
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 10:01
- 297 of 454
Can't see his posts on the ASC thread but could on here. Says he's squelched on the ACS thread but not on here. So squelched on here also. I'm using the squelch button above the "Mothercare reborn and maybe worth a punt now (MTC) " title, am I doing it wrong?
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 10:05
- 298 of 454
very strange ..... i have x-checked by un-squelching (all his posts everywhere appeared) and re-squelching (all his posts everywhere disappeared)
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 10:10
- 299 of 454
Ah well, its probally a user error, there's a squelch button above where all the treads are listed so clicked on that one also and the subject is listed there.
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 10:15
- 300 of 454
the thread list will still show that the targetted has posted, but not the post itself
by the way, during that very brief un-squelch i noticed that "our friend" says he is going to disappear from this site ..... would be nice to think he'll keep his promise, even if only to dispose of all his pretend pidgin poo
===============
for a long(er) term hold, you may want to consider GOOG
i know it's a serious heavyweight, and in % terms you may not get fireworks, but i reckon it should still be a very tasty performer
galatica
- 20 Jan 2014 10:22
- 301 of 454
tomasz, how right you are, I only came here to read, but today I take my hat off to you for being so honest with some posters over here.
Lies, lies and more damned lies is typical of some, they talk with a false tongue.
pick up a penny off the floor?
some they do with a double option, you know what I mean, hopping maybe is not only their pocket is going to be filled.
back to business, some shares are making some progress alfter all
Zechariah 14:12 ►
And this shall be the plague with which the LORD will strike all the peoples that wage war against Jerusalem: their flesh will rot while they are still standing on their feet, their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths.
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 10:26
- 302 of 454
now try to spell the attribution correctly!
does one assume you are refugee from ADVFN?
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 10:40
- 303 of 454
Have considered Google before Cynic, I'm very pro-Android maybe worth another look.
As for our irritation, he remains banished forever from my screen, I care not if he stays or goes.
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 10:44
- 304 of 454
would be quite nice to have a GOOG and even AAPL and other US stock threads, but it's a pain as i don't think one can post charts .... or are you clever enough to do that, for i'm certainly not?
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 11:06
- 305 of 454
Should be able to figure out the charts, I was thinking about creating a shorters thread also.
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 11:10
- 306 of 454
that would certainly be interesting
GF's chart thread is pretty good, but the picks get quickly swamped
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 11:30
- 307 of 454
I follow GF's chart thread also, scanning for breakout patterns can mean things become a little erratic on a daily basis as often you'll need a day or two extra to confirm a movement. I tend to look for companies that are overvalued (for no other reason than there are plenty of people doing the opposite, shares mag, RHPS etc. etc all helping to over-inflate prices). I then watch these companies and wait for them to breakout. I don't bother with analyst numbers as these are always behind the fall.
jimmy b
- 20 Jan 2014 13:35
- 308 of 454
A short thread would be good Shortie .
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 13:37
- 309 of 454
jimmy - what a chuckle you are :-) ....... you were castigating me earlier when i set out why i was not keen on BLUR
jimmy b
- 20 Jan 2014 13:40
- 310 of 454
Why am i a chuckle ,i don't care about BLUR i care about you having a dig at random posters, i just like to read the threads without that nonsense . Whats wrong with me saying a short thread would be good .
cynic
- 20 Jan 2014 13:54
- 311 of 454
you're a sensitive little soul too aren't you
if you had bothered to read more thoroughly, which clearly you did not, you might have understood why i posted as i did to DC .... if you had followed other threads of his - eg WAND - you will have seen that i actively supported him
have i had much handbagging with tomasz?
damn right, and for good reason, as shortie would attest in his own right
i'm more than happy to take criticism when it is warranted, but on this occasion it patently was not!
Shortie
- 20 Jan 2014 14:30
- 312 of 454
Jimmy, I'll second the tomasz statement, I've squelched him... Have a read back of the ACS thread and you'll see why.
jimmy b
- 20 Jan 2014 14:33
- 313 of 454
Ok i think you got in late on WAND late and was probably pissed your down but not to worry, all i'm saying is please don't constantly argue on threads people want to read ,it's not just me that's mentioned it .Leave it at that.
jimmy b
- 20 Jan 2014 14:34
- 314 of 454
Shortie i agree he's been a pain to you both ,it's just i like to scroll through the threads and i do read some peoples opinions ,have done for years .
PS as i said i would like to see a short thread..
Chris Carson
- 20 Jan 2014 16:07
- 315 of 454
cynic - Big difference between tomasz and DC, apart from the standard of English. The snipe you had at DC on the BLUR thread was unwarranted imo. Your response no doubt will be 'I don't give a jot" which is fine.