Navajo
- 29 Jun 2005 14:12
Now I can keep an eye on one of my monitored stocks which I'm currently in.
Navajo
- 01 Jul 2005 15:48
- 3 of 236
I've been in these since Oct'04 and bought more on the May 'golden cross' so I'm well pleased.
I will stick with them now 'til the price dips conclusively below the 50 dma.
Navajo
- 21 Jul 2005 18:05
- 4 of 236
I could well become a 'golden cross' addict. Are there any other RR. holders been in since the 'cross' in May?
Navajo
- 28 Jul 2005 08:17
- 5 of 236
Talking to myself, but enjoying it with this stock :o)
Superb results..
hutchins
- 28 Jul 2005 09:49
- 6 of 236
I've watched it climb but never got in. Well done to you.
johnboy77
- 03 Aug 2006 16:51
- 7 of 236
The company news from Money AM on 27/07/06 said that RR dividend was increasing by 10%.
The fundamentals and the Quote screens of Money AM both say that,there is NO DIVIDEND.
To say that I am mystified is very understated.
I did send a query to the news desk, but there has been no reply.
Confusion is no basis to buy into this stock.
pma68
- 04 Aug 2006 16:32
- 8 of 236
Hello Johnboy77,
I actually work for Royces in Derby and I can confirm that there is a dividend and it has been increased by 10%. Hope this helps clear the confusion.
johnboy77
- 05 Aug 2006 00:17
- 9 of 236
Thanks to pma68 for the information, I figured this would be the correct situation.
I am still mystified as to why the disinformation is on Money AM.
Please can someone explain briefly what is ment by the " golden cross " I expect it is a chart reading.
Navajo
- 15 Aug 2006 20:35
- 10 of 236
Sorry for belated answer john'..
A 'golden cross'.
This is where the 20-day ma goes through the 50-day and then they both go through the 200-day moving averages on an uptrend, giving a longer term buy signal. Short term just use price, the 20 and 50.
A 'dead cross' is the opposite.
For example there was a short term 'dead cross' a sell signal, in the 2nd week of May. Like any signals they shouldn't be used on their own though.
Arf Dysg
- 12 Oct 2006 16:26
- 11 of 236
Dividend -
There is a dividend but it's paid in B shares. (reasons to do with tax law)
BUT....
You tell the registrar which of these three options you want. Your choice applies for all future dividends:
1) Convert B shares to cash immediately they are received;
2) Convert B shares to more RR shares immediately they are received;
3) Keep the B shares.
The dividend is what you would get if you chose option 1. Formally speaking, there's no cash dividend so some sites may report this as ZERO DIVIDEND. However, the practical effect of option 1 is that you get cash.
R-R in their comapny results may say "interim dividend of 3.8p" or something similar. This mean you'll get 38 B shares which can be converted to cash at a rate of 0.1p per share.
jkd
- 15 Mar 2007 20:55
- 12 of 236
Navajo,
i'm short rr since monday with a stop above 500. often i'm completely wrong, often i'm right but too early,that makes me wrong also which is why i use a protective stop (equates to small loss) sometimes i get it right.( equates to big gain, hopefully)
a " dead cross" versus support from the 200 dma? good move up today, might take my stop loss out tomorrow,but thats what its there for , so i shan't complain if it does.
lots of stocks making top "noises", but not yet fulfilled. failure to do so can also be success... for the bulls. interesting times.
best regards
jkd
- 02 Apr 2007 13:54
- 13 of 236
this stock is doing my head in.
good news today. why won't it go up and hit my stoploss and put me out of my misery?
maybe its gonna gap up overnite and im gonna be well in the proverbial. oh woe is me.
what to do?
best regards
jkd
jkd
- 05 Apr 2007 10:10
- 14 of 236
i've been stopped out this morning. what a relief. i was wrong on this one. no excuses.
happy easter to all
best regards
jkd
mitzy
- 15 Feb 2009 09:50
- 15 of 236
jkd
- 15 Feb 2009 17:01
- 16 of 236
m
its taken me years to adjust to these binoculars of mine, thats what i call em, ive been right so many times and still lost money over the years you wouldnt believe.
have now at long last found a formula that takes it into consideration, it seems to be working for me. took a long time though.( should that be it has taken a long time though?) to be more grammaticaly correct?
good luck to you
regards
jkd
mitzy
- 15 Feb 2009 17:58
- 17 of 236
cheers and gl.
mitzy
- 02 Apr 2009 11:15
- 18 of 236
Finally moving off the recent lows.
mitzy
- 02 Apr 2009 13:19
- 19 of 236
Moving back to 350p imo.
azhar
- 10 Jun 2009 08:18
- 20 of 236
A review of the UK defence sector by Goldman Sachs gave a boost to Rolls-Royce, its favoured stock, which gained 6.25p at 335.5p in response. Sector peer Cobham dropped 5.8p at 174.3p after being cut to sell, while BAE Systems, fell 5.25p at 334.25p on being marked sell with its price target trimmed to 330p from 400p.
skinny
- 30 Jul 2009 09:29
- 21 of 236
hlyeo98
- 06 Nov 2010 13:18
- 22 of 236
Air crashes affected by Roll Royce engines
The company's shares dropped another 30 to 591p on Friday, following a 33p fall on Thursday, after Alan Joyce, chief executive of Qantas, said the airline believed the engine failure was "probably most likely a material failure or some sort of design issue".
Rolls, seen as one of the most prestigious examples of British engineering, has seen its market value reduced from 12.24bn before Thursday's incident to 11.06bn when the FTSE 100 closed on Friday.
Rolls has asked all airlines using the Trent 900 on their A380s to perform a series of safety checks. The company declined to comment on Mr Joyce's remarks about a possible design fault, and reiterated its statement from Thursday that it would "continue to work closely with our customers as the investigation moves forward".
There are 20 A380s with Rolls-Royce engines in service, operated by Qantas, Singapore Airlines and Lufthansa. Singapore began flying its fleet again on Friday, having suspending services on Thursday to carry out checks. Lufthansa was checking the A380s between flights, and Qantas could start flying the aircraft again as soon as Saturday, after saying it would ground the fleet for up to 48 hours.
Emirates and Air France, the two other airlines flying the A380, use engines built by GE and Pratt & Whitney of the US.
Of the 234 A380s which have been ordered by 17 airline customers, some 90 will have Rolls-Royce engines, 122 have chosen the GE-Pratt/Whitney option, and 22 are undecided. British Airways and Virgin Atlantic, due to start taking delivery of A380s in 2013 and 2015 respectively, said they had no plans to change their engine orders from the Rolls' powerplants they have specified.
A380s have four engines, and EADS, the owner of Airbus, said the aircraft is "certified to be able to accomplish its mission with only three engines". EADS shares rose slightly on Friday in Paris, after falling 77 cents on Thursday.
Investigators from France and Australia are looking into the engine failure, which occurred shortly into a flight from Singapore to Sydney, forcing the A380 to return and make an unscheduled landing in Singapore.
It has emerged that the European Aviation Safety Agency warned in August that airlines should make checks and carry out repairs on their Trent 900 engines after finding "wear beyond engine manual limits".
In a further blow to Rolls, a Qantas Boeing 747 powered by the company's RB211 powerplants was also forced to return to Singapore due to engine trouble on Friday.